OV Turns Two: Something Terrible This Way Comes.

In Commentary And Analysis by andcounting117 Comments

Two years ago, having been conceived in the minds of commiserative suffering and gestated in the womb of indignant hope, Obstructed View was born. We celebrated the cerebral union of four great genius prize-winning semi-literate minds (operating under our noms de plumes, mb21, aisle 424, berselius, and yours truly, and counting) the way any intellectual quadrumvirate would: with a series of poorly crafted photoshop images. We were the Beatles. We were the cast of Seinfeld. We were the master impressionists. We were South Park. 

I was Kenny, because, oh my God, I have a habit of dying every week, most recently for good. But I got better.

If writing about the Cubs were an art form and Cub wins were our payment, we'd be considered starving artists. Not counting the postseason, the Cubs are 132-192 since we launched this site. Fortunately for us, writing about the Cubs is a soulless bed of commercial extravagance, and we're all the sort of rich that makes any sell-out adopt a false sense of dissatisfaction with material possessions.

But before wealth spoiled the innocence of our organic grassroots blogging origins, we never got into this for the money, the fame, the notoriety, or the women. No, we did it on the simple premise that baseball, even Cubs baseball is good. And talking and writing about baseball is fun. And talking about baseball is most fun when done with people who know what they're talking about, people interested in getting it right and willing to admit when they get it wrong . . . hell, even hoping to discover they're wrong. More, better information . . . people who are fans of that and Cubs baseball? They're fun to talk to. Absent that, it's still nice when those who know nothing are at least somewhat entertaining, and absent that, the boring dumb folk who are good sports about their mind-numbing stupidity are pretty cool to discuss baseball with, too, hence my inclusion in this beautiful mess.

Okay, maybe that's not the simplest premise, but it's not exactly genetic engineering. Were it actually genetic engineering, it would still be germaine to most posts on this blog, because we have always welcomed discussions on just about anything. Tongue in cheek, face in palm, mind in the ether, Obstructed View is and always has been a place where discussion both thoughtul and mindless is more or less welcomed. 

It's a good place. It's a good blog. I don't mind saying that, especially since I am by no means responsible for it.

The beginning of the baseball season has reminded me, as perhaps it has you, that baseball is good. It is more than a pasttime. It's a hobby. It's a field of knowledge and culture and passion that allows us to witness and measure and analyze the performance of men doing the stuff of which we dream.

Even the worst of teams (and the Cubs just may be that) is comprised of elite baseball players. The team we like, playing the game we love, cheered on by the friends we've made along the way . . . who we may or may not care to meet in real life ever. For two years now, we've been documenting our travails in this hobby, this pasttime, this sick and fruitless love affair, right here on Obstructed View. We've been fans for much longer than that. We'll be pretend Internet friends for much longer still. But nothing compares to the length of time we'll have to wait for a World Series crown on the north side.

In the meantime, we'll enjoy the ride. We'll continue to comment on this sport that distracts us from real life, and we'll continue to comment on the various pursuits that distract us from this shitty team. And I'll continue to intend to post more. But for now, I just want to say thank you to everyone who reads, comments, and writes on this blog. It has been an interesting couple of years. I hope this one surprises us.

Go Cubs. Happy birthday, OV. Thanks, everybody.

Share this Post

Comments

  1. Perd Hapley

    Tim McCarver wrote:

    What this means is I will no longer be broadcasting baseball games on television.

    I don’t know what you mean, but it had the cadence of a joke, so I laughed.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    1
  2. Aisle424

    Perd Hapley wrote:

    What this means is I will no longer be broadcasting baseball games on television.

    Is that like when a game is broadcast on a television channel?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. dmick89

    @ Aisle424:
    I got into it for the women.

    By the way, if you and your wife ever decide it is time to write your own obituaries as we (her) did this last weekend, take it more seriously than I did. I learned that it was not the time to make jokes and I’m still paying for that mistake.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. SVB

    dmick89 wrote:

    By the way, if you and your wife ever decide it is time to write your own obituaries…

    dmick, I just want to remind you that you promised me a few threads ago that OV wasn’t going anywhere for at least a few more years, so I don’t have to try to find a new online community I like and want to participate in. This exercise of you and your wife’s better not be a prelude to something serious…

    Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure B, Myles, 424, and occasionally AC can keep the content flowing, but none of them is going to be able to rearrange the forum every 6 months or fix my screen name. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. SVB

    Re: Atlanta baseball and my 6-yr-old daughter.

    Hadn’t thought about the Tomahawk Chop. Ugh. She’d totally be into that, seeing it as a dance move. Guess I’ll have to think about how to explain how that is rude, bigoted, etc. in 6-yr-old logic.

    I’d be pretty upset that I’ve had to shift my plans from Pitt to Atl next week, if it weren’t because the change is the result of a job interview.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. dmick89

    @ SVB:
    The need to write our obituaries, I think, was just about planning ahead. Unless she plans to kill me pretty soon, I’m guessing it won’t be used for some time. Well, I’m guessing the one I wrote will never be used, which is too bad because I had a ridiculous amount of fun writing it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. WaLi

    SVB wrote:

    if it weren’t because the change is the result of a job interview.

    I’ll be interviewing in the Atlanta area soon as well (Newnan). Great idea to try and catch a game there!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. WaLi

    So when I go to the forum to log in, I put in my password associated with WaLi and it says not the right password. I read every word so I saw you put something about this a few threads ago, but I forgot what it said, and since I don’t go back and re-read every word I need help.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. dmick89

    @ WaLi:
    You’ll need to reset your password associated with the forum. All the users had to be imported over so the posts would have the right author. Passwords couldn’t be read so they were given random passwords. In order to link your OV account with the forum account, you’ll need to reset the password for the forum at the link below. I’d go with the same password that you use for this site just to make it easier. Once it’s reset, you should have no problem linking the two accounts.

    http://obstructedview.net/ov-forums/entry/passwordrequest

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. dmick89

    @ Suburban kid:
    I don’t think so, but she was pissed off. I shouldn’t even be discussing it, but I’m not going to post it because I know how pissed she’d be. Just because she may not read it doesn’t mean it would be right. I felt bad for having so much fun when I was apparently supposed to take it ultra-seriously.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. Suburban kid

    @ dmick89:
    I’m only messing. Wouldn’t want you to end up in Mrs. MB21’s doghouse. Although I am a little puzzled by the whole exercise. I understand writing a will, but not really an obituary. Unless it is some sort of therapeutic visualization exercise intended to make you focus on your life more. Sure, you must have at least another five or ten years left to live – how could you include that?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. dmick89

    @ Suburban kid:
    I was equally puzzled. I’m all for planning for the future, even one in which I’m not here. I’ve had a will for more than a decade now and it’s been updated a number of times.

    Truthfully, I think it had to do with some deaths that we’ve each had in our families over the last few years. We’ve each written an obituary and it is a pain in the ass. There’s a lot you don’t know about someone, even if you’re married. My wife is from Rhode Island. She knows where I graduated high school, but in a way that’s like, “that’s right, I knew that.” We didn’t grow up together, we didn’t meet until we were adults.

    So to be fair, I think it was just a way to make the process easier. Many of the names and dates and places that we might have to look up are right there in a little document. I still have to write mine so I’ll let you know how it goes. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. mikeakaleroy

    @ dmick89:
    I’d start removing sharp objects from the house, but that’s just me…

    Also, I haven’t gotten those emails, so I’m guessing that the blog is sending to some dude named Elroy. I’m in, so it matters not.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. Ryno

    For you football fans, I have a discussion question: If you could add one player in the NFL to your team’s roster, who would it be? Don’t worry about salary.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. gbts22

    @ Ryno:
    As a Bears fan, I would have gone with an elite LT before they signed Bushrod, who is more than serviceable. I think I’d go with someone like Mike Pouncey, because then you could shift Garza back to G where he is substantially better. Two birds with one stone.

    Or Calvin Johnson, cause wow.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. Akabari

    I high school our teacher made us write obituaries for ourselves and draw tombstones. Parents were PISSED. And the teacher was surprised when a bunch of high school guys wrote shit like we were the first ones to cure cancer in space (dying laughing)
    I guess it was supposed to make us see our own mortality..?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. dmick89

    @ 26.2cubfan:
    How do you go about asking someone if they plan to kill you? Should you expect an honest answer? I’ve watched enough 48 Hours Mysteries to know that these people are lying. Either that or all the people they’ve had are actually innocent.

    It always cracks me up when one of them asks the guest, in a most serious tone, “did you do it?” (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. gbts22

    @ WaLi:
    I think it’s pretty clear that Mrs. MB is planning MB’s demise so she can inherit a piece of the intellectual property rights of the Hope Monster.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. Ryno

    @ gbts22:

    That’s why I asked. My first thought for CHI would be OL, but the OL should be less of an issue in the WCO.

    Novorro Bowman was another thought, but not much positional value there.

    Can’t go wrong with Calvin Johnson.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. Ryno

    @ Berselius:

    Not a fan of Nick Perry? If 3-4OLB, I’m guessing you would like Von Miller or Aldon Smith. If S, I’m guessing Eric Weddle?

    Honestly, I think a 5-technique would make Perry look a lot better. Segue…

    That’s the route I’d go with SF. The front 7 is awesome, but a LOT of that hinges on the aging Justin Smith. My selection for SF would be JJ Watt, and it’s not close.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. Berselius

    Ryno wrote:

    Not a fan of Nick Perry? If 3-4OLB, I’m guessing you would like Von Miller or Aldon Smith. If S, I’m guessing Eric Weddle?

    I keep forgetting that GB drafted him, since he was injured all season (dying laughing). Clearly JJ Watt is the best choice on defense for just about any team.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. Ryno

    @ Berselius:

    JJ Watt is the default answer for any 3-4 team. Geno Atkins should be for any 4-3 team.

    I think Adrian Peterson and Calvin Johnson are the default answers for offense.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. Berselius

    dmick89 wrote:

    And if the blog is mentioned in my obituary I’ll kill myself. (dying laughing)

    I’d be pretty impressed to see you come back from the afterlife just to kill yourself (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. Suburban kid

    For almost 10 years, they knew each other only through Internet chat rooms. Now, they will meet in person for the first time. Up next, on Oprah.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  25. Ryno

    So last year, Alex Smith (10th) was slightly more productive then Ben Raplessburger and slightly less than Tony Romo according to DVOA.

    Kaepernick (3rd) was slightly more productive than Aaron Rodgers, but there was quite a dropoff from Manning and Brady (playoffs not included).

    Cutler (27th) was just behind Hasslebeck and ahead of Vick.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  26. Ryno

    49ers reportedly looking to move up in the draft. Hopefully by that, they mean trade 1.31 to OAK for their 1 next year. #Clowney

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  27. SVB

    MB, do you think your wife was upset because of your opening line?

    dmick, after overcoming a collection of serious personal challenges, then decided to attempt another, and got married.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  28. SVB

    Tigers will open with closer by committee. GW and I have an unstated bet that Leyland won’t be able to hold to it, and will take the easy way out by just riding one of these guys the whole time.

    The Tigers will open the season with a closer by committee. It just won’t include their closer of the future.

    Detroit set its pitching staff Thursday morning by optioning hard-throwing prospect Bruce Rondon to Triple-A Toledo, along with long reliever Luis Marte. With that, the seven-man bullpen is set for Opening Day, with lefty Darin Downs and high-strikeout middle relievers Al Alburquerque and Brayan Villarreal joining long reliever Drew Smyly and veterans Phil Coke, Joaquin Benoit and Octavio Dotel.

    Team president/general manager Dave Dombrowski, who announced the moves, said manager Jim Leyland will mix and match relievers in the ninth inning according to matchups. He didn’t announce the key members in the committee, but Coke, Benoit and Dotel would be most likely to get the bulk of the save opportunities.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  29. SVB

    @ dmick89:
    My grandmother asked me to write my grandfather’s eulogy about 15 years before he died. Not, “will you do Grampa’s eulogy when he dies”, but “will you write Grampa’s eulogy now?” He was 80-ish at the time. Probably easier to write a eulogy in advance than an obit, but still…

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  30. WaLi

    SVB wrote:

    GW and I have an unstated bet that Leyland won’t be able to hold to it, and will take the easy way out by just riding one of these guys the whole time.

    What is considered “riding him the whole time”? 70% of the save opps?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  31. PoollaTiz

    Nice post. I understand some thing even more difficult on unique blogs everyday. It is going to usually be stimulating to read content from other writers and practice somewhat something from their store. I’d prefer to use some with the content on my weblog whether you don’t mind. Natually I’ll provide you with a link on your internet weblog. Thanks for sharing.

    [url=http://buyschristianlouboutina.web1337.net]christian louboutin outlets[/url]

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment