Cubs sign Gerardo Concepcion

In Transactions by dmick89126 Comments

The Cubs signed 18 year old Cuban defector Gerardo Concepcion today. It's reportedly a multi-million dollar deal. More information to come.

UPDATE: Who is Gerardo Concepcion (Yankee Analysts, h/t to DJ)

UPDATE 2: I was going to write more about this, but after looking at the stats that were found in the link on Yankee Analysts, I have no interest but to quote them.

At 17, he broke out in the Cuban National Series, winning rookie of the year for his 2010-2011 performance. In that season he posted a 10-3 record with a 3.36 ERA through 101.2 IP. Now, 18, Concepcion is listed at 6’1” and 175 lbs, a thin frame that figures to grow and add velocity to his 89-91 MPH fastball. Concepcion’s secondary pitches include a plus curveball and solid slider and changeup.

2010-2011 Cuban League
Age W L ERA G GS IP H R ER HR BB SO H/9 BB/9 SO/9 FIP
18 10 3 3.36 21 16 101.2 103 42 38 6 43 53 9.1 3.8 4.7 4.75

As you can tell by the chart, the 4.75 FIP indicates Concepcion’s success in Cuba was most likely luck. His 4.7 SO/9 does not compliment the report of a plus curveball. Still, the other numbers are quite impressive when you consider his age and competition. A 3.8 BB/9 at such a young age, for a pitcher topping out at 94, illustrates above average control. When you combine the relative control with his 9.1 H/9 and a 0.53 HR/9, against Cuban hitters ten years older and in their prime, the statistics suggest that Concepcion has a very advanced feel for pitching.

I don't agree that the numbers suggest he has an advanced feel for pitcing. He may only be 18, but those are ugly numbers. Take a look at the minor leagues here and find me a group of pitchers who struck out under 5.5 per 9 while walking between 3.5 and 4 per 9 who developed into much of a starting pitcher and I'll be shocked. 18 or not, if these numbers were posted by a kid the same age in Low A or High nobody would think twice about him. He'd be demoted.

UPDATE 3: Concepcion was signed to an MLB contract, which means the Cubs will need to free up a 40-man roster spot if they have not already done so. Concepcion will begin using options immediately. This is very strange.

Share this Post

Comments

  1. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    from previous thread:

    Regarding the DR facility, even though spending is severely capped and “leveled” amongst the bidders, the kids are still free agents who can choose whom to sign with. So if everyone is offering $100, perhaps you choose the team who has a facility and has been working with you, providing additional stuff like education, etc?? Just guessing, but perhaps that’s the Cubs logic. Is it obvious I’m not a businessman yet? (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. mb21

    Holy shit, this guy isn’t any good. At all. He’s 6-1, 175, had a 4.75 FIP last year. Struck out 4.7, walked 3.8 per 9. Gave up 9.1 hits per 9. These are ugly numbers. He’s only 18, but still.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. dylanj

    its basically a projection pick. If the kid grows into his body and gets better then great. If not he’s just another failed prospect.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. WaLi

    @ mb21:
    Eh I don’t mind stock piling players. Hopefully a few will pan out. Plus these numbers are against aged players.

    Most important numbers though: 10-3 with 3.36 ERA. ALL-STAR!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. 8volumesthick

    Does this give us a clue that Cubs are more likely in prospecty type Cubans (Soler) to develop or Cespedes, age assumes a little more urgency on the part of the Superfriends

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. dylanj

    i think the Cuban league was estimated as being = to High A or AA ball. For an 18 yr old that’s not bad. 89-91 with that frame should = more velocity as he ages but this is all just guessing.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. bubblesdachimp

    @ dylanj:

    “@Kevin_Goldstein: No. 6. RT @BeanballBobby91: @Kevin_Goldstein where would u put concepcion on the cubs prospect list?”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. mb21

    @ dylanj:
    If an 18 year old in Low A had these numbers would anyone think twice? We’d argue he should be demoted. These are ugly numbers. I understand he’s 18 and that’s at least a reason to be hopeful he can someday strikeout 6 per 9 and maybe walk 3 per 9. It’s also a reason to be pessimistic and think that by the time he’s 23 he’ll be striking out .5 per 9 and walked 78.7 per 9. I really hope this is just a multi-year deal and not a multi-million dollar deal.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. dylanj

    i know md, again i would bet this is something the scouts saw and were willing to take a chance on. Because if they dont see projection in this kid then its a waste of money

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. dylanj

    I’m probably wrong,
    but I had him second on my list, behind Soler and ahead of Cespedes. Not half an hour ago, I was thinking “Love the new facility. Now sign someone already.

    10-25-2011. Theo Epstein joins the Cubs. Now, the fun begins.
    by timh815 on Feb 2, 2012 6:05 PM CST reply

    Sigh. Sure pass on the guy with 33 HR’s and a .424 OBP for an 18 year old who is 8 years from the bigs

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. mb21

    @ dylanj:
    I’ve never seen AA. I’ve seen Low A to High A. The Dominican Winter League is considered just under the quality of AA. There’s no way Cuban baseball is close to AA.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. mb21

    @ dylanj:
    Yeah, but that can be said of all signings. The team isn’t signing players just to sign them. They get input from scouts all the time. I can’t question the scouting information because I don’t really know. Other than him throwing 89-91 and him more closely resembling a pencil than a human I don’t know. All I can do is look at the stats.

    This is another one of those where I don’t really care. It’s not my money. That’s kind of the attitude I’m taking with this stuff anymore. If you were going to sign one guy from Cuba I think Soler was the guy to sign. Arguments can easily be made it should be Cespedes, but I’d rather not spend that kind of money.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. mb21

    @ dylanj:
    He’s not our 6th best prospect. I may as well pencil myself in as the team’s 7th best prospect if he’s the 6th best. I don’t know what KG is talking about, but there’s not a fucking chance this guy is the 6th best prospect in the worst farm system in history.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. WaLi

    mb21 wrote:

    @ dylanj:
    If an 18 year old in Low A had these numbers would anyone think twice? We’d argue he should be demoted. These are ugly numbers. I understand he’s 18 and that’s at least a reason to be hopeful he can someday strikeout 6 per 9 and maybe walk 3 per 9. It’s also a reason to be pessimistic and think that by the time he’s 23 he’ll be striking out .5 per 9 and walked 78.7 per 9. I really hope this is just a multi-year deal and not a multi-million dollar deal.

    Let’s be honest, you don’t need a reason to be pessimistic.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. 8volumesthick

    mb21 wrote:

    If you were going to sign one guy from Cuba I think Soler was the guy to sign. Arguments can easily be made it should be Cespedes, but I’d rather not spend that kind of money.

    Isn’t this kind of strawman. I mean why can’t the Cubs sign more than one Cuban guy this year?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. Mish

    @ WaLi:
    Out of 6.

    I’m pretty meh depending on the money involved. There’s just enough in the scouting reports for hope, yet there’s a lot of numbers that aren’t impressive.

    I’ll take a wait-and-see approach. And if I ever do see, it won’t be any sooner than3-5 years down the road anyways.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. mb21

    We’ll know more tomorrow with regards to whether or not Garza will be traded or extended. If the Cubs win I expect he’ll be traded sometime in the next 5 months. If Garza wins the Cubs will sign him to an extension because he’ll have very little trade value at that point.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. Xoomwaffle

    Kevin Goldstein @Kevin_Goldstein
    Yes. Fantastic polish for age, not crazy stuff.

    This does not seem like exactly what I would look for in an 18 year old prospect, no matter where he is from.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. Rodrigo Ramirez

    Maybe they signed him to be this year’s Cuban Carlos Pena and make the other potential Cubans more comfy.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. 26.2cubfan

    Isn’t this kind of like getting an extra 1st round pick? Hell, I like this deal better than the F7 one…

    And keep in mind, MB, that the Low A to High A comparison is imperfect. There aren’t any 27yo sluggers in Low A. The fact that the kid was able to be successful against hitters with more time in the game is worth something, and the equivalency isn’t one to one.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. 26.2cubfan

    On the Dominican facility – remember that a lot of those kids sign at 16 or 17 for peanuts, so I can’t imagine an international draft applies to more than 5-10 of the 60+ kids who will be in the camp. This is basically throwing a bunch of money on the chance that you might find a ML starter who is cost-controlled out of that bunch. If you can pay the kids $15k/yr and build this facility, then hitting on 1 of those is worth the investment. What will Castro’s surplus value be by the time he’s a free agent?

    Also, I read a book called Soccernomics a couple years ago that talked about European teams taking advantage of the undervaluation of foreign players. The most applicable part mentioned that once the undervaluation was recognized, the real value was in getting African or Brazilian players who would actually adapt well. The European leagues are littered with can’t miss South Americans who sucked because they couldn’t get their shit together off the pitch. Having a school that helps these kids prepare for a life in the US, where they’ll spend several years in podunk corn towns before making the bigs has value. If a few more kids per year are able to make the adjustment as a result of the school and facility, then you’re upping the chance that some of those kids will provide value to the ML club.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. Aisle424

    This deal keeps getting weirder. According to Brett over at BN:

    UPDATE III: Another side effect of a Major League deal – again, assuming it’s not some kind of anomaly – is that Concepcion would be using an option year each season he’s on the 40-man but not called up to the bigs. Without getting into a convoluted discussion of options, that would mean the Cubs would *have* to call Concepcion up within three years (possibly four, if he spends his entire first year at A-ball), or subject him to waivers. He would be just 21 or 22 at that time.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. Aisle424

    @ 26.2cubfan:

    I think that matches up well with Theo’s mantra of grinding out small advantages wherever they can be found. I think the days of finding massive market inefficiencies is pretty much gone. There are too many analytical minds at work coming from all different angles, and there really aren’t many secrets in the league. Once a team starts sniffing around something, someone else will come in and follow right along instead of bull-headedly sticking by some belief that new things are stupid.

    The Cubs are stuck building this up for a long time, but the nice thing is that they have enough money to maintain it once they achieve a championship level of talent in their system. Teams like KC and Pittsburgh will still have to sell off their high-priced talent at a reduced rate since they have to trade them or lose them for nothing.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. Aisle424

    josh wrote:

    @ Aisle424:
    Maybe the scouts see something, but the numbers guys figure if he’s a bust, no one will want him when he walks.

    Yeah but what do you do if he is clearly making progress, but is not ready for the bigs yet? He’ll be 22, some team will claim him on waivers if he’s decent at all.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  25. mb21

    @ 26.2cubfan:
    That’s true, but we’re talking about a horrible K/9 rate. There are 18 and 19 year olds who face 22 year olds in the minors. It happens frequently and if we saw a K/9 rate under 5 we’d dismiss him.

    I’d say this is like getting an extra 4th round pick who you signed to an MLB contract. At least Samardzija had 1st round talent.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  26. mb21

    I also wouldn’t be the least bit surprised if Concepcion is required to be on the 25-man roster within 2 years or something. I’d actually be a little surprised if he isn’t.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  27. GW

    UPDATE III: Another side effect of a Major League deal – again, assuming it’s not some kind of anomaly – is that Concepcion would be using an option year each season he’s on the 40-man but not called up to the bigs. Without getting into a convoluted discussion of options, that would mean the Cubs would *have* to call Concepcion up within three years (possibly four, if he spends his entire first year at A-ball), or subject him to waivers. He would be just 21 or 22 at that time.

    This is also required for major league deals, no?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  28. GW

    the Low A to High A comparison is imperfect. There aren’t any 27yo sluggers in Low A. The fact that the kid was able to be successful against hitters with more time in the game is worth something, and the equivalency isn’t one to one.

    agree with this. there probably isn’t enough data to attempt to translate component stats, but I would expect variation in things like k-rate based on the different makeup of the league.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  29. mb21

    However, regardless of where concepcion pitches this year he’ll have used an option. Once he’s optioned in spring training it counts as one option year. The additional option is useful for players who are drafted in the summer and then sign later on.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  30. mb21

    I wouldn’t really call what Concepcion did in Cuba successful. I think he was pretty bad. Considering he only gave up 6 home runs and that his FIP is 4.75 I think that’s just bad.

    Player A: 97.2 IP, 101 H, 3 HR, 37 BB, 61 K, 9.3 H/9, 3.4 BB/9, 5.6 K/9
    Player B: 101.2 IP, 103 H, 6 HR, 43 BB, 53 K, 9.1 H/9, 3.8 BB/9, 4.7 K/9

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  31. Aisle424

    josh wrote:

    @ ACT:
    The article isn’t real clear, it almost sounded like someone just saw him taking a drink. So maybe it’s not so bad.

    I’ve never been addicted to alcohol and then relapsed, so I don’t know what the consequences of taking a drink really is, but people are acting like he woke up missing a tooth in a Las Vegas suite with Mike Tyson’s tiger in the bathroom.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  32. doc_blume

    @ josh:

    He did relapse a few years ago and I think he went back into treatment almost immediately afterward. I’d imagine, since this is public now, the same thing will happen this time. I don’t see this getting out of hand.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  33. Aisle424

    josh wrote:

    @ Aisle424:
    I never have either, but one drink isn’t a killer. It’s a relapse, and he needs to make sure it doesn’t get out of hand, but one drink isn’t the end of the world.

    No, but one drink can often lead to one more drink and so on and so forth. this guy isn’t someone who went to AA meetings because it was fashionable or because he may have had a bit too much of the devil’s nectar one night at a club. He was full-on out-of-control, so it probably doesn’t take much to unleash that monster. If he had the kind of self-control (and that may be a poor phrase choice) that you and I probably take for granted, he wouldn’t be an addict. I think that is why people are freaking out about it, and they might be right to be making these jumps. I just don’t know.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  34. shawndgoldman

    the Low A to High A comparison is imperfect. There aren’t any 27yo sluggers in Low A. The fact that the kid was able to be successful against hitters with more time in the game is worth something, and the equivalency isn’t one to one

    The problem with this line of thinking is it can explain some statistical deficiencies, but not the ones exhibited by Concepcion. If he has a killer K rate, but a high HR rate I’d chalk the latter up to facing some studs that are 10 years his senior. But that’s not the case. If Cuban ball is really A-ish in talent level, and this guy is a year or two from the majors, he should be eating their lunch.

    That all said, it’s not a ton of money, and the scouts seem to like him. It’s not like the Cubs have better things to spend it (or their roster spot) on. It’s a lottery ticket. I like it for the same reasons I liked the JeffF7 draft. (And the problem with that pick – the lack of acknowledgement of sunk costs – appears to be gone.)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  35. shawndgoldman

    When it comes to guys coming from Cuba, it’s getting close to the end-member where stats are meaningless and you have to rely solely on scouts. So although I tend to numerical-based analysis, this is the type of case where if the scouts love a guy I say “OK. Go get him.”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  36. GBTS

    Can anyone with an astute basketball mind give me one possible explanation why Thibs willingly put the Knicks on the line when the Bulls were up 4 with under 10 seconds left?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  37. shawndgoldman

    Maybe the Cubs are going back to this style jersey:
    [img]http://discrimihater.fateback.com/baseball/cubs95bp.gif[/img]

    [img]http://playersofelbeisbolcubano.files.wordpress.com/2009/06/cuba-wbc-jersey.jpg?w=450[/img]

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  38. GBTS

    Aisle424 wrote:

    Josh Hamilton is allegedly off the wagon.

    Well in the old days, how do you think they got the booze from town to town?

    On a wagon!

    [img]http://www.thegregbradyproject.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/seinfeld-stand-up.JPG[/img]

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  39. GBTS

    @ shawndgoldman:
    It was on the ball. The Knicks needed to score on two possessions in as little time as possible, so Thibs gave them two free points AND stopped the clock. Even if he’s afraid of a 3 pointer, even coming down the court and launching one at the first opportunity would have killed half the clock. I was livid.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  40. SkipVB

    I was looking over bad contracts for the next three years and wondered if anyone would trade Soriano’s bad deal and $14 million to Baltimore for Nick Markakis. The money evens the salary out. Can’t imagine Baltimore would do this, but at least Soriano could DH. Maybe an A-ball C+ pitching project thrown in would help.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  41. mb21

    I haven’t paid close enough attention to Hamilton’s drug and alcohol abuse. I know I wouldn’t have wanted my alcoholism and drug addiction on the front pages or discussed on various forums like is inevitable for someone as famous as Hamilton. That in itself is tough to deal with and I have a ton of respect for Hamilton. It’s already difficult enough staying clean, but the amount of pressure he has on him, the number of eyes watching him and waiting for him to fail makes it far more difficult than anything I ever went through. Hamilton undoubtedly has a support group as I did, but unlike me most of the world is watching and waiting for him to fail so they have something to discuss. I’m sure people over the years doubted whether or not I could remain sober and for good reason, but I didn’t have anybody rooting against me like there are for Hamilton. Sure, everybody says they want him to live a healthy life, but being destructive sells newspapers. The journalists love it. The fans love it. It’s gossip. It makes the athlete human and we can more easily judge them in ways we can judge others, but not ourselves of course.

    One drink? Two drinks? So what. Relapses happen. The only important thing at this point is that he tries to stay clean. You can’t wake up the next day and feel as though you’ve failed. That’s exactly what leads to the vicious cycle. I can’t count the number of times I went to bed high, drunk and depressed. I’d tell myself I’d never do it again and the next day I did. I became more depressed and more likely to use. If I had a drink tonight or smoked some crack tomorrow I’d wake up the following day and move on. If I wake up depressed I’m going to use again. It’s time to move on. There’s nothing I can do about what already happened.

    It’s impossible to say you just forget about it because you don’t. How can you not forget that you had been sober for 4088 days and now you’re shooting for day 1? You can’t. I’m not looking to be sober for 4188 days or 5000 days right now. All I’m trying to do is remain sober for 4089 days. If I can’t do that I stay sober for 1 day. Even though you can’t forget about all those days in a row that you can no longer proudly count, you have to move on. If you focus on going from 4088 to 1 you’re probably not going to succeed. Depression will set in and the cycle will begin again.

    I’m assuming Hamilton knows this. He’s relapsed before and move on and hopefully he will this time.

    You know what though? It really is interesting to me that when these super human athletes behave like humans people are so fucking quick to judge them. I haven’t read anything about this, but from what 424 said it sounds like people are already freaking out and that’s not too surprising. I can’t count the number of times over the last decade I’ve read some fan or journalist talk about how these guys are humans and not a spreadsheet yet it’s those people who don’t accept it when they behave like a human.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  42. josh

    @ Aisle424:
    Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying it’s to be taken lightly, but the other side of the coin is that the guy is under a microscope all the time because of what happened to him, and it could be over reaction to something he already has taken care of privately.

    Edit: what MB21 said.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  43. josh

    @ shawndgoldman:
    That’s pretty much my takeaway from this too. Scouts were all hot on him. He obviously is showing something his numbers aren’t, so maybe it works out, maybe it doesn’t. They have enough money to take some chances.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  44. mb21

    @ shawndgoldman:
    Yeah, a high HR rate and you can chalk that up to luck, but strikeouts and walks are the two most repeatable events for pitchers. Strikeout rate is actually more indicative of how a pitcher will perform the following season than anything else. A K/9 under 5 is horrible. I get that he’s 18 and there’s always the potential he could suddenly improve, but I’m guessing improving as much as necessary would be next to unheard of. Not only does his K/9 have to improve considerably, he’ll have to improve at missing bats just to maintain that K/9 rate as he moves up the farm system. I’d be very surprised if he’s ever capable of striking out more than 6 to 6.5 per 9 as a starter. I think that’s a ceiling here. It’s entirely possible he could greatly improve his command and still maintain a solid K to BB ratio. I actually think that’s the best chance he has of being much use as a starter in the future. I’d also be surprised if he’s ever capable of striking out 7 per 9 as a reliever.

    It’s not my money so whatever.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  45. mb21

    @ SkipVB:
    Apparently the O’s were one of the teams talking to the Cubs about Soriano. That’s not a bad idea. I think you probably have to include a better prospect though and maybe a little more money. I haven’t take a look at Markakis though.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  46. Berselius

    mb21 wrote:

    @ SkipVB:
    Apparently the O’s were one of the teams talking to the Cubs about Soriano. That’s not a bad idea. I think you probably have to include a better prospect though and maybe a little more money. I haven’t take a look at Markakis though.

    There’s no way that the O’s trade Markakis. Peter Angelos : Markakis :: Jim Hendry : Koyie Hill, except multiply that by 100

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  47. Berselius

    mb21 wrote:

    @ Berselius:
    Has Markakis sucked lately?

    His numbers have taken a dip from his first few seasons, but he’s still a 2-3 WAR oF

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  48. shawndgoldman

    mb21 wrote:

    Yeah, a high HR rate and you can chalk that up to luc

    It’s not just the luck of a small sample size. It’s also that the he’s not dominating the bottom of the talent pool.

    If he had a high HR rate and high strikeout rate, I could say “OK, when he faces the studs he might be getting lit up, and that’s expected for a kid still in his teens. But at least he’s dominating the bottom of the lineup.”

    But that’s not the case. He’s not striking enough guys out, which means he isn’t dominating the worst players in A-ish ball. That’s my problem. You can’t explain that away by saying Cuba has some awesome hitters. He faces those guys one or two times per trip through the lineup. The other 7-8 guys probably suck, and he should be striking them out.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  49. GW

    shawndgoldman wrote:

    mb21 wrote:
    Yeah, a high HR rate and you can chalk that up to luc
    It’s not just the luck of a small sample size. It’s also that the he’s not dominating the bottom of the talent pool.
    If he had a high HR rate and high strikeout rate, I could say “OK, when he faces the studs he might be getting lit up, and that’s expected for a kid still in his teens. But at least he’s dominating the bottom of the lineup.”
    But that’s not the case. He’s not striking enough guys out, which means he isn’t dominating the worst players in A-ish ball. That’s my problem. You can’t explain that away by saying Cuba has some awesome hitters. He faces those guys one or two times per trip through the lineup. The other 7-8 guys probably suck, and he should be striking them out.

    You could just as easily make the argument that the league is full of scrappy, get on base types, and that Conceptifornication would fare better against younger, impatient players. I don’t think that’s true (after all, there are no white guys in the league), but I don’t think we can presume much about the talent distribution there without knowing more details.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  50. shawndgoldman

    GW wrote:

    shawndgoldman wrote:

    mb21 wrote:
    Yeah, a high HR rate and you can chalk that up to luc
    It’s not just the luck of a small sample size. It’s also that the he’s not dominating the bottom of the talent pool.
    If he had a high HR rate and high strikeout rate, I could say “OK, when he faces the studs he might be getting lit up, and that’s expected for a kid still in his teens. But at least he’s dominating the bottom of the lineup.”
    But that’s not the case. He’s not striking enough guys out, which means he isn’t dominating the worst players in A-ish ball. That’s my problem. You can’t explain that away by saying Cuba has some awesome hitters. He faces those guys one or two times per trip through the lineup. The other 7-8 guys probably suck, and he should be striking them out.

    You could just as easily make the argument that the league is full of scrappy, get on base types, and that Conceptifornication would fare better against younger, impatient players. I don’t think that’s true (after all, there are no white guys in the league), but I don’t think we can presume much about the talent distribution there without knowing more details.

    The point is that the “defense” of his numbers is that Cuba isn’t truly A-ball in that guys can’t get promoted beyond that level. So even though it’s A-ish overall there are some MLB-caliber players there. If so, you’d expect him to have mostly great numbers, with a few bad ABs/PAs thrown in from when he faces MLB-ready guys when he’s < 20. That would be consistent with a high K rate and high HR rate.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  51. Rice Cube

    I know you said already that his FIP was bad-ish, but is it possible that he’s outperforming his FIP because he’s inducing weak contact, and that’s not being reflected in the statistics being reported? Maybe they figure that’s something they can work with a la Dave Duncan and “pitching to contact”…not sure how many of you believe in that kind of stuff, but there must be a method to the madness.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  52. GW

    shawndgoldman wrote:

    GW wrote:
    shawndgoldman wrote:
    mb21 wrote:
    Yeah, a high HR rate and you can chalk that up to luc
    It’s not just the luck of a small sample size. It’s also that the he’s not dominating the bottom of the talent pool.
    If he had a high HR rate and high strikeout rate, I could say “OK, when he faces the studs he might be getting lit up, and that’s expected for a kid still in his teens. But at least he’s dominating the bottom of the lineup.”
    But that’s not the case. He’s not striking enough guys out, which means he isn’t dominating the worst players in A-ish ball. That’s my problem. You can’t explain that away by saying Cuba has some awesome hitters. He faces those guys one or two times per trip through the lineup. The other 7-8 guys probably suck, and he should be striking them out.
    You could just as easily make the argument that the league is full of scrappy, get on base types, and that Conceptifornication would fare better against younger, impatient players. I don’t think that’s true (after all, there are no white guys in the league), but I don’t think we can presume much about the talent distribution there without knowing more details.

    The point is that the “defense” of his numbers is that Cuba isn’t truly A-ball in that guys can’t get promoted beyond that level. So even though it’s A-ish overall there are some MLB-caliber players there. If so, you’d expect him to have mostly great numbers, with a few bad ABs/PAs thrown in from when he faces MLB-ready guys when he’s < 20. That would be consistent with a high K rate and high HR rate.

    but if the run environment was significantly different (through park dimensions, the type of baseballs used, atmospheric conditions, you name it), the incentives for players could be significantly different. can’t make those assumptions about the distribution of talent and their specific skill sets confidently without more info. though as i’ve said, my best guess is that he’s just not very good.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  53. WaLi

    Not sure what this means, if anything. Probably just meh, but based on the spreadsheet listed above:

    >50 IP
    Rank out of 111
    RAR 18
    K/9 52
    BB/9 60
    H/9 29
    HR/9 9

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  54. mb21

    The idea that Concepcion is the best pitching prospect in this organization is laughable. He may end up being good, but right now there is simply no way on earth he’s the best pitching prospect.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  55. Aisle424

    josh wrote:

    @ Aisle424:
    That was great.

    His complete inability to let a single thing go by without comment is amazing. My comment probably would have been buried if it had gone without response, but he had to engage. It’s mainly why I do stay away from over there since it’s just too easy, but I had to give Shawn a hard time.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment