Daily Facepalm: Something I’ve Not Felt Since….

In Facepalm by aisle424143 Comments

 

There's been some unusual disturbances in the Force in the Cubs universe recently. Nothing on the scope of millions of voices suddenly crying out and being suddenly silenced, but more like when Luke went into that weird tree on Dagobah and you didn't know what the hell was going on.

Movin' On Up

The Cubs announced plans for the 2013 version of the annual Cubs Convention! So we'll see the usual gathering of snarky Cubs fans drinking alongside ex-players and media at Kitty O'Sheas and… wait… what? It's not at the Hilton this year?

After 27 years at the Chicago Hilton and Towers, the Cubs are moving the convention to a new venue for the first time, giving the Sheraton Chicago Hotel & Towers on the Chicago River a crack at hosting the event a bit more smoothly than the Hilton seemed capable.  That's nothing against the people that worked at the Hilton.  The crowds just seemed too big for what their facilities could offer.  The Sheraton is a nicer facility and judging by its specs, the facilties are generally larger than what the Hilton can offer.

The timing of it seemed odd since the Cubs had a bitch of a time selling the passes to last years' Cubs Con (I don't think they ever did actually sell out), and now they are moving to a bigger facility when enthusiasm about the Cubs has got to be at pre-Sammy Sosa lows?  Maybe they're getting a better deal from the Sheraton people.  Maybe the Ricketts are Sheraton rewards members and now they never have to pay for a Sheraton hotel room anywhere in the country for the rest of their lives.  I don't know. What I do know is that it's a pretty big tradition to break from. John McDonough is probably spinning in his grave. They should make sure they assign a few interns to hang out in the Hilton lobby to redirect wayward fans who accidentally end up at the wrong hotel out of sheer habit.

Cubs Say They Don't Want a Revolution

NBC has been hyping one of their new shows for awhile now and part of the preview involved the characters hiking past a grown-over Wrigley Field (I guess all of the world loses power in 2012 and it's now 15 years later or something). In the previews, beneath the marquee, a sign has been added declaring the Cubs as the 2012 World Champions. However when the show aired last night, the additional sign was blanked out.

Apparently someone with the Cubs didn't like the reference:

How’d they lose the championship in the final cut? “I can’t comment too much on it, only to say that the administration of the Cubs felt strongly that that shouldn’t be there,” [writer, Eric] Kripke tells TVLine. “I’m from the Midwest, and it was not meant as a dig. It was meant as a ‘Wouldn’t that be tragic irony, that I’m rooting for the Cubs and they finally won the year the world ended?’ It was about rooting for a team I have great affection for, but they didn’t see it that way. It’s their team, and I get it.”

Again, it's strange that the Cubs weren't interested in free publicity, even if it wasn't in the best light.  Like Kripke said, it wasn't intended as a bash, but the Cubs do seem to be taking some strides to not be viewed as a national joke anymore. I mean, not on the field yet, what with Joe Mather still batting lead-off and such, but you catch my drift.

Late Night Drinkin'

According to Red Eye reporter, Matt Lindner, it seems the Cubs sold alcohol far later into the night than usual:

In addition to setting a record for latest start in Wrigley Field history, Monday night also likely marked the longest amount of time beer sales were allowed. While the team generally cuts sales off in the seventh inning, on Monday night it was in the fourth inning. To be fair, the fourth inning took place around 11:30, meaning fans had a full six-and-a-half hours to get their drink on, so it's not like the Cubs were being unreasonable by shutting things down when they did.

Wrigley's alcohol policy for as long as I can remember it has been consistent:

Alcoholic beverages will not be sold after the last out of the 8th inning during day games and the last out of the 7th inning or 9:20 p.m. for night games.

What I wasn't sure about is whether this policy is in accordance with some MLB alcohol policies (since every stadium I've ever been to has had similar policies), if it is something that is based on a written or informal agreement with the neighborhood, or if the Cubs are free to enforce or not enforce this policy based on individual circumstances.  I've never seen alcohol sales get extended beyond that 9:20 limit, and I've been to a number of games where the game has been delayed far enough into the night where the 9:20 cut-off happens well before the 7th inning.

I sent an e-mail to Kevin Saghy, the Cubs PR and social media guru (I don't think that's his exact title, but it should be). He confirmed they sold beer until the 3rd inning and he referred me to Julian Green, Vice President, Communications and Community Affairs (his actual title) about the alcohol policy itself.

I asked Mr. Green about the seeming discrepancy between their published alcohol policy and the sales getting extended last night and he was kind enough to respond (bolding is mine):

There was no discrepancy last night since the policy refers only to on-time starts for day and night games. Our policy is consistent with the majority of baseball stadiums and ballparks which cut off alcohol sales at the end of the 7th or 8th inning but could also be discontinued earlier at the discretion of the team. Obviously, due to the 3 hour plus rain delay last night, the game started late. As Kevin shared with you, beer was sold for the first three innings then concluded at our discretion.

So no MLB rules or local ordinances were broken. It was just a pretty unique situation and they decided the few hundred folks who stuck it out deserved a few beers. 

So, in summation, the Cubs have moved their big fan festival to a venue that might actually be equipped to handle it, someone took some steps to eliminate the Cubs' lack of winning as a punchline on national TV, and they exercised some actual judgement in serving the fans who stuck out the insanely long delay to watch them lose.

I knew I still sensed some good in them.

Share this Post

Comments

  1. Suburban kid

    @ josh:
    The Cubs had that C for awhile too, back in the ’40s I think. If you remember the game that was the 60th anniversary of WGN telecasts in 2008, the throwbacks they wore that day had the Reds’ and Bears’ C on the hat. Zambrano started that day against the Braves. Edmonds had a clutch homerun and Len did a great Jack Brickhouse impression.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. josh

    @ Suburban kid:
    The guy who designed it: “I got a great idea. What about a C with a little tip on it!”

    “Like the Red Stockings’?”

    “No, no, no *hic* COMPLETELY different.”

    “Are you drunk, sir?”

    “Of course!”

    “Just checking. Let’s hear more about this magical C.”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. mb21

    Considering how the Pirates fucked over the Cubs in recent years I was glad to see them repay the Pirates, but I’m actually hoping the O’s get in the playoffs.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. Mercurial Outfielder

    @ josh:

    Fresh turd today. “Cutler Comes Up Small In Big Games” where author determines which were the “big” games and shockingly these magically overlapped with Jay’s poor performances. QED.

    Nothing like a self-confirming hypothesis!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. GW

    @ Rice Cube:

    (dying laughing) that’s an archetypal scouting story.

    I had to walk back down the mountain for about four miles in freezing cold conditions with gloves, a balaclava and snow jacket,” he recounted. “At the bottom of the mountain, I found a convenience store, [and] I had the lady in there book me a taxi

    all the way down to the fact that it’s about a middle reliever in a mediocre bullpen. every scout reading that is now tumescent. bill plaschke has never been more envious.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. SVB

    @ Rice Cube:
    Write it up for Imaginaire. Make sure you include a lot stats that the Scout makes up to tout the “propect’s” talent. That’ll maybe get it through the Math requirement for Josh’s journal.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. SVB

    @ Rice Cube:
    SI did a feature on this guy a few months ago. The O’s have been babying the crap outta his arm and took away his best offspeed pitch because of concerns. Except he has no injury history. If he kicks ass, the era of pitch and inning counts will be irreparably cemented as best practice no matter what Nolan Ryan does. My prediction is that he doesn’t actually know how to pitch that well. So his short term career will be extreme swings between awesome and suckage.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. SVB

    So I’m confused about all this talk about the Bears. They aren’t in the same league, success-wise, as the Cubs. Why the interest? Clearly the Bears are like the Minnesota Twins of football, not always great, but frequently competitive.

    Shouldn’t the NFL analog to the Cubs be the Lions? Where is all the Lions chat here? Go Matt Stafford and Calvin Johnson. Rah Ndlucmsfoiusdfhlsk Suh, the Carlos Zambrano of football.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. SVB

    @ josh:
    To be honest, I wouldn’t know. I just know he has a rep as a hothead. I don’t really follow NFL much. MLB–>CFB–>College and some pro Hockey–>MLB.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. mb21

    @ Berselius:
    But baseball is dead, b. Nobody watches anymore.

    I swear, every time I read one of those articles I want to punch someone. If baseball was so dead, why are they making more money than they ever have? They made a fraction of the NFL a decade ago. now they’re almost even.

    Baseball is dead!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. Rizzo the Rat

    @ mb21:
    That would be fun. ut if the Orioles do make it, it would mean that sabermetrics is wrong and we’d have to find a new religion.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. Rice Cube

    @ josh:
    There’s a ginormous building with a spire at some point, and when I kept trying to go up, it never seemed to end. I wonder what the range of this animation was. There were a couple Amish buggies too.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. josh

    @ Rice Cube:
    Someone figured it out in the forums. Very large, but I don’t remember what, exactly. You can find the whole thing done up google map style (zoom in/zoom out) somewhere. I’m real helpful, but I gotta jet for now so I don’t have time to look it up.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. Author
    Aisle424

    Rice Cube wrote:

    @ mb21:
    I don’t have your $50 subscription fee, but *waves hand* credits will do fine.

    Bull-fucking-shit! Fucking credits will not do fine, motherfucker! Do you think you’re some sort of fucking Jedi, with that mind-control shit? Fuck that!

    (If Tarantino had directed Phantom Menace.)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. Suburban kid

    If any of you jackwads would like a one-day pass for MLB.TV Premium good for tonight only, let me know within the next hour.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. Rizzo the Rat

    Harry Caray was not a good singer by any means, but at least he knew the song (tempo and lyrics), felt comfortable in front of a microphone, and let the audience sing half the song. At least 90% of the guest conductors pale in comparison.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. mb21

    The guest conductor makes a mockery of what Harry made popular in Chicago. I’m surprised the Cardinals haven’t had a 7th inning stretch singer (a horrible one) at Busch vs. the Cubs just to make fun of this shit.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. Rizzo the Rat

    @ mb21:
    People saw what Harry did and said, “Hey, anyone can do that!” Thing is, what Harry did was not so easy. That guy knew how to play to an audience.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. WaLi

    Did the guest conductor leave the interview after 2 outs? I wasn’t really paying attention to who it was, but he was definitely dismissed early.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. mb21

    @ Rizzo the Rat:
    Harry got the fans into it. They looked forward to that at Wrigley Field. The guest conductor thing was cool in 1998 and maybe even 1999, but since then it’s just been stupid. It’s long past time to give that up.

    I have never seen the fans as into the stretch since his death as he would get them on a daily basis.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. Rizzo the Rat

    I always thought “Take Me Out to the Ballgame” was an awkward choice to sing. I mean, some kind of fight song I could see, but a song about how much you would like to see a game when you’re already at one? (Not to mention, if you read the lyrics to the rarely-sung verses, it’s written from the perspective of a woman who wants her beau to take her on a date. That’s why it says “Take me out.”)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. mb21

    @ Rizzo the Rat:
    I’m reminded of this quote that can be found on Baseball Almanac.

    “In the seventh inning fans all get up and sing ‘Take Me Out to the Ball Game,’ and they’re already there. It’s really a stupid thing to say and I don’t know who made ’em sing it. Why would somebody that’s there get up and sing take me out to the ball game? The first person to do it must have been a moron.” – Pitcher Larry Anderson

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. Rizzo the Rat

    @ Berselius:
    I’ve noticed that, too. I think a lot about song lyrics. Like how when Harry changed the original lyric from “Crackerjack” to “Crackerjacks,” he violated the rhyme scheme (it’s supposed to rhyme with “back”). Call me a pedant.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment