What's wrong with Carlos Marmol?

In Commentary And Analysis by dmick8933 Comments

Between 2007 and 2011, Carlos Marmol threw 382.1 innings and allowed a ridiculously low 218 hits. He allowed only 21 home runs and struckout 540 batters. That's the good Marmol.

During those same years Marmol threw 23 wild pitches, hit 39 batters and walked 241 of them.

Despite a high walk rate, he still managed to have a higher than 2 to 1 K/BB ratio. He was very difficult to hit and when he did get hit he didn't give up many home runs. We've talked about how the home runs would regress as well as the BABIP. Both did, but he was still a good reliever.

Marmol has particularly struggled against right handed batters. It needs to be pointed out that overall Marmol has faced just 60 batters so that in itself is a very small sample. Looking at splits makes the samples even more useless. Righties have a .387 wOBA against Marmol this year as opposed to a .287 career wOBA. Lefties have a .352 wOBA and a career .294.

The reason righties have hit so well is because they have 1 home run and 1 double while lefties have 2 doubles, but no home runs. Marmol has been walking the world this year so both handed batters have OBP's over .400 against Marmol so far.

I had actually begun to look a little deeper into Marmol's struggles so I'm going to post the pitch f/x data with only a couple of comments.

Year Pitch Count Frequency H. Mvt V. Mvt Mph H. Rel V. Rel Spin Θ RPM
2010 4-seamer 603 42% -7.48 -13.52 94.85 -2.23 5.27 216 1,976
2012 4-seamer 126 45% -7.29 -17.29 93.59 -1.9 5.42 223 1,600
2007-2012 4-seamer 3033 44% -8.18 -13.87 94.24 -2.21 5.28 219 2,017
Year Pitch Ball Call Str. Swings Fouls Whiffs BIP GB LD FB PU HR
2010 4-seamer 39.80% 25.21% 33.50% 13.76% 10.28% 9.95% 1.82% 1.66% 4.81% 1.66% 0.33%
2012 4-seamer 46.03% 21.43% 32.54% 16.67% 4.76% 11.11% 3.97% 1.59% 3.97%   0.00%
2007-2012 4-seamer 40.65% 20.87% 37.09% 17.67% 8.97% 10.91% 2.64% 1.55% 4.81% 1.91% 0.59%
Year Pitch Count Frequency H. Mvt V. Mvt Mph H. Rel V. Rel Spin Θ RPM
2010 Slider 841 58% 7.77 -35.63 84.38 -2.3 5.43 66 912
2012 Slider 135 49% 5.96 -37.55 83.78 -2.01 5.41 49 847
2007-2012 Slider 3921 56% 7.97 -35.81 83.46 -2.29 5.43 70 898
Year Pitch Ball Call Str. Swings Fouls Whiffs BIP GB LD FB PU HR
2010 Slider 36.03% 22.47% 40.55% 12.72% 19.02% 8.92% 4.16% 1.78% 2.14%   0.00%
2012 Slider 45.19% 20.00% 34.81% 12.59% 10.37% 11.85% 4.44% 1.48% 2.96% 2.96% 0.74%
2007-2012 Slider 36.85% 23.72% 38.64% 12.60% 14.54% 11.53% 5.13% 1.94% 3.24% 1.22% 0.18%

I included 2010 because it was Marmol's best season. The swing and whiff rates are both down. The other noticeable difference is the percentage of pitches that are balls. We already knew that based on his 12+ BB/9 rate. There may also be something in the other numbers, but I'm not qualified to comment on most of them.

Marmol has never had good control, but his control is so bad this year that he just can't succeed. My guess is that this is just a horrible start and when Marmol returns we'll see the same Marmol we've gotten used to. A pitcher who has been overrated becasue of his strikeouts, but is a lot of fun to watch when he's on.

Share this Post

Comments

  1. Mercurial Outfielder

    Short version: Carlos Marmol is either putting clown shoes on people or wearing them himself. More of the latter lately.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. WaLi

    So Dale Sveum says he did the Starlin Castro sac bunt to avoid a double play. How does that make sense? If you move the runns over from 1st to 2nd and 2nd to 3rd, then LaHair gets walked and you have 1 out, bases loaded, and Soriano up. Now a double play is still possible and it ends the inning entirely!

    There needs to be a long talk between Thoyer and Sveum. Actually, it doesn’t need to be a long talk. All that needs to be said is “STOP WITH THE SAC BUNT!”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. Aisle424

    Maybe Sveum doesn’t think teams respect LaHair enough yet to walk him intentionally. I can’t think of another reason why that scenario would make sense in his head. Because if he did think that LaHair would get walked, he literally is saying that he is cool with taking the bat out of his two best hitters’ hands AND giving the defense a free out.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. mb21

    @ Rice Cube:
    I wouldn’t say it’s optimism. I don’t think Marmol is a very good closer. He’s a good reliever and maybe even a good setup man, but I wouldn’t consider him a good closer.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. Mercurial Outfielder

    @ Aisle424:

    He told Sullivan he was willing to let LaHair get walked to stay of the DP. His postgame comments last night are thick with the stupid.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. Mercurial Outfielder

    For those that missed it in the last thread, here’s the dolt in his own words:

    Sveum said he wanted to stay out of the double play, “even though you figure they’re going to walk (Bryan) LaHair” to get to Soriano.

    “The more people you start getting on base and turning that (lineup) over is fine with me,” Sveum said.

    Soriano was 0-for-9 with seven strikeouts against the reliever, while LaHair already was 3-for-4 in the game with a two-run homer.

    “Some poor bunting, but it wasn’t as much the bunting as you have to pull back and slash in those situations when they’re charging,” he said. “It’s hard to get guys to understand that. It’s something you work on and work on, but it kind of speeds up a little during the game. That’s something we have to work on as much as anything because it’s such a prevalent part of the game.”

    ye gods.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. josh

    @ WaLi:
    Exactly. DP candidate up to bat with the bases loaded instead of letting Starlin, who frequently hits singles, get a shot for an RBI, and with Campy on 1st, maybe 2 RBIs. Starlin has already proven he’s not that great of a bunter. Why are you using a game situation to try to teach someone the art of pulling the bat back and taking a hack at it? The guy has shown he’s not that good at it, so you put him in a situation where he is sure to fail? Fucking ridiculous.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. Mercurial Outfielder

    @ josh:
    And then after the game, refuse to acknowledge you mistake, double down on the stupidity, and toss the player under the bus.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. GBTS

    @ Aisle424:
    I think Sveum has some bunting issues. Like deep, psychological issues, where he didn’t get a bunt down in 3rd grade and received an atomic wedgie that haunts him to this day.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. WaLi

    Mercurial Outfielder wrote:

    Some poor bunting, but it wasn’t as much the bunting as you have to pull back and slash in those situations when they’re charging

    And then he goes on and insults Castro. I’m don’t care that Castro doesn’t know how to bunt. He has 4 sac bunts in his career, all of them came in his rookie season. You know why? Because he sports a .333/.349/.438 triple slash. LET HIM HIT!

    If he takes a walk (which isn’t likely) then the bases are loaded for your best hitter. It wasn’t even a situation where you can say “oh I guess that makes sense”. It was a dumb ass move.

    AND THEN HE DID THE SAME DAMN THING NEXT INNING!!

    Runners on 1st and 2nd with no outs and he bunts!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. Mercurial Outfielder

    @ WaLi:

    Yeah, tossing Castro under the bus for his (Sveum’s) mistakes is fucking despicable. I want this bunting, balding, wannabe biker out of here.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. Mercurial Outfielder

    @ WaLi:
    Not to mention he’d just bunted with Campana, so even the element of surprise was gone. It’s one of the dumbest, maybe the dumbest, thing(s) I’ve ever seen a manager do.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. Mobile Rice

    @ Mercurial Outfielder:
    Since it was late innings I wonder how badly it dropped the win expectancy. I figure with the Cubs being away team they would want to score as many runs as possible especially with a shitty bullpen, and not just to play for the one go-ahead run.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. bubblesdachimp

    Paul Sullivan ‏ @PWSullivan
    Sveum not interested in debating ‘cybermetrics.’: “The bottom line is I’m the one that makes the decisions.” Exits, laughing. Touche.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. josh

    That was fucking dumb. IF Castro happened to be the worst hitter on the team, then, maybe it’s justifiable. MAYBE. The fact that he’s in the top 2 makes it a godawful move.

    Counterpoint: Ron Washington’s entire managing career.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment