The Children Are The Future-Cubs Minor League Update Sponsored by Acapulco Taco Pie

In Minor Leagues by Obstructed View Staff107 Comments

Iowa

Another day another Anthony Rizzo HR. He decided to pair his 13th shot of the year with a triple and kept his average at .359. Brett Jackson on the other hand is really scuffling right now as he slipped down to .226 after another 0-4 day. Randy Wells got shelled and has a 7 + ERA right now. He is also getting paid some 2 million dollars to do so.  Some people noticed Gioskar Amaya got promoted from instructs straight to AAA but he is just filling a bench spot while the club waits to see if DeWitt will accept assignment to Iowa. Amaya got his first AB as a PH and promptly doubled.

Smokies

Junior Lake continues to hit going 3-5 with 3 RBI's in the 10-8 win. Justin Bour went 2-4 with his 6th home run of the year and Alberto Cabrera earned the save.

Daytona

Rain Out

Peoria

Hey look, its a Geraldo Concepcion start where he didn't totally suck! Concepcion worked 6 scoreless innings walking 3 and striking out 3. Ben Wells followed with three shutout innings of his own and Zeke DeVoss tied the Peoria franchise record with 4 stolen bases in one game. DeVoss had 4 at bats and got a pair of hits go with a pair of walks. 

Share this Post

Comments

  1. Author
    Mish

    @ mb21:
    Just a couple of really busy weeks at work, and I’m actually going on vacation next week. I am still hear reading most every word though. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. Author
    Mucker

    What’s the deal with B Jax? Thought he’d be at Wrigley at some point this year now it doesn’t look as such.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. Author
    jtsunami

    I have nothing to back this up, but I wouldn’t be surprised if they are tinkering with his swing to cut down on the K’s which in the short term is crushing his numbers.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. Author
    mb21

    I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s true about Jackson’s swIng, but it’s not helping so far. He’s really struggling.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. Author
    mb21

    Do we know for sure that Amaya is at AAA to just fill a hole for a few days? To me, that seems less likely tha skipping him 4 levels. Surely there are other guys who could fill that hole.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. Author
    Mucker

    @ mb21:
    Does BJax swing and miss a lot or does he K so much because he’s working such deep counts? I wonder if him being more aggressive early in the count would cut down his K%?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. Author
    Rice Cube

    @ Mucker:
    In the few games I’ve paid attention to it seems like he’ll swing and miss even on the first pitch, but that’s probably true of all players at some time or another. Maybe he should just go back to whatever he was doing that allowed him to OPS .900+ last season.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. Author
    mikeakaleroy

    I think BJax just sees how much the Chicago bullpen is struggling and is making a case to be transformed to a relief pitcher.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. Author
    Rice Cube

    http://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/baseball/whitesox/chi-ventura-nl-strategy-is-obvious-20120515,0,7305357.story

    “It’s different when you don’t have the DH,” he said before Tuesday’s game against the Tigers at U.S. Cellular Field. “People say the National League is harder because you have double switches and things like that. But (NL strategy) also allows you to make obvious moves when the pitcher is coming up and you take him out because he has got to hit.

    “In the American League, you make moves because you make moves. There’s no automatics of taking a pitcher out because (he’s coming to bat), and there would be a double-switch that would happen because of that. So in the American League you make a move because you are making a move. There’s a reason for it, not just (because) the time dictates it.”

    Just throwing that out there.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. Author
    mb21

    Yeah, there is more strategy in the AL. Pinch hitting for a pitcher in the 7th inning isn’t strategy. It’s common sense.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. AndCounting

    mb21 wrote:

    Yeah, there is more strategy in the AL. Pinch hitting for a pitcher in the 7th inning isn’t strategy. It’s common sense.

    Not if you’re Don Zimmer and the pitcher is Chuck McElroy.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. Berselius

    mb21 wrote:

    Yeah, there is more strategy in the AL. Pinch hitting for a pitcher in the 7th inning isn’t strategy. It’s common sense.

    Probably better to say there’s relatively little strategy in both leagues.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. Author
    mb21

    @ Berselius:
    There’s a lot of strategy in the game, but most of it is in both leagues (lineup construction, defensive positioning, batter-pitcher match-ups, pitching, etc). It’s always irritated me when NL fans say there’s more in the NL because the freaking pitcher bats. Pitcher gets to 100 pitches you pinch hit. Pitcher not pitching particularly well you pinch hit. There’s no strategy in that. Only inferior batters.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. Author
    Rice Cube

    I would add to that by saying that in the NL you know there’s an auto-bunt/auto-out coming up in the 9th spot, whereas in the AL, the bunt could come as a surprise or as design at any point in the lineup.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. Author
    josh

    Baseball’s not all that strategic of a game. I would like it if you could somehow write the rules so that a really smart manager could actually have a huge impact on taking his team all the way, but the fact is that the swing seems to be mostly negative, and the traditional managers, while not perfect, don’t hurt the teams much with their decisions. It’s not like they’re out there leading off with pitchers because it’s tradition.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. Author
    ACT

    Personally, I’d say that one of the reasons I hate pitchers batting is that it leads to their getting taken out of the game when they’re doing well.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. Author
    josh

    @ GW:
    Yeah, but it’s routine so that levels the playing field, and putting a better hitter there doesn’t improve your win percentage by such a margin that you suddenly would see a team winning 100 games with just that change.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. Author
    ACT

    @ josh:
    Not to mention, the #2 hitter thing costs, what, 10 runs a year compared to an optimal lineup? That’s pretty big for a managerial decision, but pretty small in the grand scheme of things.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. Author
    josh

    @ josh:
    For example, if TLR’s theory of batting the pitcher 8th made any sense, and was the reason he won the World Series twice, everyone would do it, and the advantage would be nullified. I’m not saying there’s no strategy, just that I think strategy doesn’t instantly translate into success, it also takes a lot of other things.
    ,

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. Author
    josh

    @ ACT:
    Yeah, the best manager can give his team a couple of wins, basically. That’s great if you need an edge to get over a better team, but if you’re middle of the pack, then it’s kind of meaningless. That’s basically why I think they picked Sveum. They are focusing on player developement right now and they thing Sveum will give them that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. Author
    ACT

    @ josh:
    Tango found a tiny advantage to hitting the pitcher 8th in The Book, though MGL said it doesn’t always show up on his simulations.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. Author
    ACT

    Personally, even if there is some tiny theoretical advantage to hitting the pitcher 8th, I’m not sure it’s worth telling some position player that he has to hit behind the pitcher. Player confidence and comfort are more important than perfect lineup optimization.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. Author
    mb21

    @ ACT:
    I agree with this. Managers are for the most part managing egos and hitting a position player after the pitcher can’t be good for one’s ego. I think the advantage The Book found was like 2 runs, right? That could easily be nullified by the happiness of the player who ends up batting 9th most frequently.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. GW

    @ josh:

    they picked sveum because he was the best of a bad lot (ie former players interested in the gig). they didn’t have the balls to cross the line and bring analytics to the bench.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  25. Author
    mb21

    @ josh:
    There’s a lot of strategy in baseball. The pitcher is trying to keep the batter off guard all the time. He’s mixing his pitches, which is strategy. The catcher is calling for pitches. The dugout calls for certain pitches. Pitch outs. Defensive alignment. The lineup order. Who is in the lineup (left/right match-ups). Defensive replacements. Pinch hitters and pinch runners. Playing the infield in (or back). Pickoff attempts. Pitcher going home without a leg kick when a runner is on base. Bunting. Hitting and running. Stolen base attempt.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  26. Author
    mb21

    GW wrote:

    they picked sveum because he was the best of a bad lot (ie former players interested in the gig). they didn’t have the balls to cross the line and bring analytics to the bench.

    I agree with this. I’ve been meaning to write an article about it and include what you’ve said before regarding an analytical type as a bench coach. I’d probably go with manager though and the bench coach being the old timey traditionalist who manages egos. I got a feeling the analytical manager is going to be more open to what the bench coach would say regarding egos and what not than the old timey manager would be willing to incorporate analytics in his decisions.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  27. Author
    josh

    Are they even trying to get Garza to practice throws to first when he’s not playing? He needs a shit ton of reps doing it right.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  28. Author
    josh

    @ mb21:
    Maybe a couple of days of focus would break whatever mental block he has. He knows how to throw the ball to another guy. That’s what he does for a living. Surely this is some kind of weird psychological tic.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  29. Author
    bubblesdachimp

    This might be crazy but would you consider bunting at garza on third base side every time till he proves he can throw to first?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  30. Author
    josh

    @ mb21:
    I know it’s a little different. I think that’s what it is, that he’s letting up instead of firing it over there, and that attempt not to throw so hard is causing him to think about the throw. If he just reacted, he’d throw it over there hard with no problem.

    Then again, what the hell do I know?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  31. Author
    josh

    Is there anything worse than Gary Meier’s commercials on WGN radio? I can’t think of anything. Although, maybe whatever the next commercial is will probably be as bad.

    @ bubblesdachimp:
    Juan Pierr3 agrees

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  32. Author
    ACT

    I know the idea that home runs come in bunches has been debunked, but Sori sure hits his home runs in bunches.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  33. Author
    EnricoPallazzo

    i always feel bad that people are cheering for soriano. these same idiots will be booing the hell out of him as soon as he goes on a 1-13 stretch. they shouldn’t be allowed to also cheer for him when he does good.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  34. Author
    EnricoPallazzo

    @ josh:

    according to the box he’s only had one today. then the one he threw in the stands and (i thought) one other one, and i assumed he has at least one i haven’t seen. that’s where i came up with 4+. but 2 different websites say he only has 1 prior to tonight so i was wondering if pitchers are held to a different fielding standard. i mean i know they are but i was wondering if anyone knows specifics?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  35. Author
    josh

    @ EnricoPallazzo:
    I guess the second bad throw was a close play, now that I think about it. So, if they’ve been cases like that, where a good throw gets the guy out, but the throw doesn’t go past the first baseman, then maybe you don’t get an error. Errors or not, his defense is agonizing.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  36. Author
    ACT

    @ mb21:
    Because on errors–by definition–the “blame” is given to the defense, not the batter. Not saying it’s right, but that’s the way it is and has been for over a century.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  37. Author
    ACT

    If you want a more rigorous (MGL-esque) explanation, it would be that ROE’s are not (short-term) good indications of batter skill (i.e., ROE numbers are dominated by randomness over yearly samples). Over the course of a year or so, it might be more “accurate” to count an ROE as an out, just as you ignore a pitcher’s BABIP over similar lengths of time.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  38. Author
    ACT

    I mean, LaHair hit a can of corn today and by some weird fluke, he wound up on second. What does that tell you about his skill other than that he made contact?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  39. Author
    WaLi

    So has anyone seen that Obama has added himself to the past 14 or so presidential biographies on the white house website? (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  40. Author
    mb21

    @ WaLi:
    I saw some headline about it, but didn’t read the article. I assume this is uncommon, which seems odd to me considering the massive egos politicians have. Either way it’s pretty funny.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  41. Author
    josh

    I thought someone else was taking over MLB.com Fastcast. Now Eric Heiss is doing it again. That guy has the most annoying voice in all of broadcast journalism.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment