Site should be fine now

In Commentary And Analysis by dmick8950 Comments

Hopefully the site is back up and running for good now. Our host, Dreamhost, had a DDoS attack on one of its data centers. This led to multiple extended outages at Obstructed View beginning on Monday for a few hours and then Thursday for much of the day. They have reportedly made some hardware changes, which will supposedly protect against this type of attack in the future. We'll see.

We're sorry for the inconvenience and hope it doesn't happen again. If it does, we will have to find an alternative as this is unacceptable to us. Thanks for being patient. I'm sure most of you were more patient than mb21 was getting. Let's hope you were.

Since we don't like to publish short posts, let's talk about Ryan Dempster and the idea of pitching one inning too long. This was a complaint last season and I'm sure after his start the other day we'll hear about it again if we haven't already.

First of all, batters perform better the more times they see a pitcher in a game. The first time through the order the pitcher has a distinct advantage. The second time through it's basically neutral and the third time the batters have an advantage. By the fourth time through the order the average reliever is better than all but maybe a few starting pitchers in baseball.

We also have to consider the inning. We can't really say Dempster pitched an inning too long if he didn't even pitch in the 7th inning. By that time the pitcher will be close to through the order 3 times so the batters have an advantage. If we go with 4 runs per 9 allowed for Dempster as a true talent we'd have to increase that since he'd be facing lineups the third time and maybe even the fourth time. We can increase his R/9 to 4.5 and maybe even higher. That's what we'd expect him to allow at that point in the game.

Last season Dempster entered the 7th inning 14 different times. He threw a combined 13.1 innings and allowed 10 runs. Ignoring the fact that it's only 13 innings, we also have to factor in that by that point in the game it's often a pitcher may come out of the game after allowing a baserunner or two. He may not even be on the mound when those runs score. He often isn't given the chance to finish the inning so there's chance for more runs scoring in fewer innings.

Share this Post

Comments

  1. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    From Sveum’s postgame comments, it appears that he is factoring the the stress level of earlier innings when determining whether or not to pull his starter. I suppose the data supports this. He’s said stuff like “those were pretty stress free 90 pitches, so i felt comfortable giving him 15-20 more”. That combined with the shititude of the bullpen, and I guess that’s why there have been so many late inning performances.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. mb21

    @ Recalcitrant Blogger Nate:
    I’m perfectly fine with Garza pitching that deep into a game like that. I remember Maddux talking about this before and he said as a starter he wanted to go deeper when he had a big lead, but wanted to turn it over to his bullpen when the game was close. This is how it should be. In a close game the average reliever is better than all but a handful of starters. Those are the games you should be turning it over to the pen.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. bubblesdachimp

    I would like Garza to keep pitching like this…

    To be honest after 7 games we got 5 legit good ass starts one meh and one awful start.. If we keep pitching like that you never know what will happen right?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. WaLi

    bubblesdachimp wrote:

    To be honest after 7 games we got 5 legit good ass starts one meh and one awful start.. If we keep pitching like that you never know what will happen right?

    And our record is still 2-5.

    But if we had started Clevenger in all those games, we’d probably be 7-0. His CERA is rediculous.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. bubblesdachimp

    I understand what the record is.. I am just saying if you pitch that well you tend to win a lot more then you lose

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. Berselius

    WaLi wrote:

    But if we had started Clevenger in all those games, we’d probably be 7-0. His CERA is rediculous.

    He’s got 3 R+RBI in only 2 starts. But I don’t know what his finger tape stats are.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. jtsunami

    Didn’t feel like checking the other thread, but last night both Reggie Golden and Dillon Maples got hurt.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. WaLi

    @ bubblesdachimp:
    But you also have to score runs, and I don’t think we’ll be scoring many 8 run games (dying laughing)

    But yeah, if we can keep having our starters pitch shutout baseball then we should win some.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. bubblesdachimp

    @ WaLi:

    No i hear ya… Gotta score to win for sure.

    From Arizona Phil:

    Javier Baez slugged a three-run home run, tripled twice, drove-in four runs, and scored three more, Dan Vogelbach crushed a towering two-run home run over the RF screen and onto Camelback Road

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. mb21

    The Cubs currently have a team .317 BABIP. This would naturally lead to a very high wOBA and lots of runs. Nope. wOBA under .300 (wRC+ under 90). Things are only getting worse for this offense. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. mb21

    I’d also like to point out that Soto’s so-called slump is still good for league average offense. That’s despite a .182 BABIP. I’m all for Clevenger getting a couple starts per week, but I don’t find it comforting that the manager thinks he’s off to a terrible start.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. Berselius

    @ Mish:

    Everything’s under control, situation normal. We just had a small weapons malfunction, everything’s perfectly all right now. We’re fine, we’re all fine here now, thank you. How are you?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. josh

    The starting pitching has been okay, but the bullpen hasn’t. If we’re not scoring runs (a la, the Giants of two years ago) then it takes not only awesome starting performances, but also a lights out bullpen and defense (a la the Giants of two years ago).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. mb21

    But this offense just isn’t going to score enough to win many games. Factor in their defense and baserunning and it’s even worse. This is a bad team that has actually gotten off to a good start in some ways and they’re still only 2-5.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. josh

    @ mb21:
    The team could get this starting pitching all season and still come out under .500. I gotta believe that putting the better hitters on the team higher up on the order would help.

    Anyone know what our baserunning stats are so far? I haven’t been following every game, but they seem to have had, from what I’ve heard, some success on the bases without costing the team too many outs. Or at least it has been better than what we saw this spring.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. josh

    Lahair has been having a good/lucky start. His BABIP is .556, and his K rate is 33%, which unfortunately isn’t much higher than his projection. He’s been finding holes so far, when he gets the bat on the ball.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. mb21

    @ josh:
    So far it’s not been that bad thanks in large part to Castro who has been worth .8 BRR so far according to Baseball Prospectus. Soto has been worth .4 and DeJesus .3. Soriano -.5 and Mather -.6. As a team they’ve been worth 1 run above average so far, but there’s no way in hell Soto keeps that up. That’s just a week. I expect they’ll be better on the bases than in past year, but still bad.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. josh

    @ mb21:
    Is BRR based on slugging percentage and steals? Still, we saw guys trying to steal virtually every time they were on base in Spring. That didn’t seem like a great idea, and it hasn’t played out in the regular season, from what I can tell. I’d be happy if Castro learned how to steal bases effectively. That’s the skill keeping him from being a leadoff guy, since he is a singles type hitter.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. josh

    @ Mish:
    I like how there is absolutely no reaction from the crowd. No one cares about first pitches. Especially not by the time you get to the fifth first pitch of the pregame.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. Suburban kid

    Speaking of satanic bitches, my main bitch is awesome. She is just what you want out of a bitch. She’s a girl, so you don’t get the hassles of having a dog. However, she looks like a dog and even raises her leg when she pees like a dog.

    Nice little terrier bitch looks like a tough little dog. Just took her to the groomer the other day so she looks all trim and doesn’t smell.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. mb21

    Strasburg now has 105 career IP and his numbers are:

    2.24 ERA
    1.87 FIP
    2.24 xFIP 😮
    11.14 K9-1.97 BB9; 5.65 K/BB
    48 FIP- 59 ERA-
    4.2 WAR

    So if Strasburg’s number were extrapolated for a full season, he would have about 8.4 WAR which would be the 3rd best pitcher season of the last 10 seasons behind Greinke’s 09 and Johnson’s 04 (how did he not win a Cy Young?)

    I’m wondering, where would you put his true talent level as of today? If you had a gun to your head, would you put his true talent level as top 3 or even the best? — http://www.insidethebook.com/ee/index.php/site/comments/livan_strasburg/#6

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment