Series Preview: Brewers (1-5) at Cubs (2-4)

In Series Previews by berselius60 Comments

seriespreview

The Cubs open their first homestand against a team that is in even worse shape than they are. The Brewers are already missing first basemen Corey Hart and Mat Gamel due to injuries suffered before the season, and in the past week 3B Aramis Ramirez, LF Ryan Braun, and SS Jean Segura have all been banged up. None of the injuries are necessarily *that* bad, but the Brewers didn't want a short bench so Ramirez hit the DL. I wouldn't be surprised to see Segura follow him there too. The Brewers already had SS Alex Gonzalez playing first, now he'll probably move to SS if Segura can't go and (dying laughing) Yuniesky Betancourt (dying laughing) is probably their starting first or third baseman. 

Team Overviews

2012 NL ranks listed in parentheses

  Brewers Cubs
wRC+ 105 (2nd) 80 (16th)
BSR 7.4 (2nd) -8.1 (14th)
UZR -4.4 (9th) 30.5 (2nd)
DRS 14 (3rd) -7 (7th)
SP FIP- 96 (4th) 108 (13th)
RP FIP- 101 (11th) 116 (16th)

The Brewers had a better year than I remembered, finishing with a 83-70 record but well out of the last playoff spot. They lost half of their rotation from last year, with Zack Greinke going to LA, Shaun Marcum going to the Mets, and Randy Wolf going upstate to live on a farm with a nice family (and millions of dollars). Offensively their best player is obviously Braun, but don't sleep on the rest of the outfield. Norichika Aoki quietly had a solid year and settled into the leadoff role, and while Carlos Gomez is still a terrible OBP guy (.305), he has plus power and speed and could be the best defensive center fielder in the NL now that Michael Bourn is in Cleveland.

Injuries

I covered most of the Brewers ones above, but one of the other reasons why they had to break the glass on Yuni was because their usual backup infielders, Jeff Bianchi and Tyler Greene, are both on the DL as well.

Sveum thinks Barney could be back in a week. He gets his stitches removed soon, and has already taken some BP and fielded some grounders. Ian Stewart is DHing in extended spring training, but it will probably be a few days until he starts playing on defense. Matt Garza threw another bullpen session yesterday without incident.

Storylines and Players to watch

There's going to be epic amounts of booing whenever Ryan Braun steps to the plate. We might have a chance to see dueling bullpen implosions, as Brewers closer John Axford has been extremely hittable in the small sample of the season we've had thus far. He had plenty of struggles with walking batters last year (5.06 K/9), so he can get in trouble in a hurry.

The Cubs are still waiting for a few of their starters to heat up. Soriano has four singles and nine strikeouts, and leadoff man David DeJesus has two hits (both doubles) and a single walk. Starlin Castro has yet to record an extra base hit as well. 

Pitching Matchups

2012 ERA, FIP-, xFIP, and 2013 ZiPS projected FIP are listed for each pitcher.

Monday: Marco Estrada, RHP (3.64, 86, 3.48, 3.80) vs Edwin Jackson, RHP (4.03, 99, 3.79, 3.62) 1:20 PM CT

Estrada was knocked around in his first start, facing the Rockies. He struck out eight batters with no walks, but was burned by the long ball. Estrada has been a fairly extreme flyball pitcher in his career, so pitching in Wrigley in April is likely to suit him. He throws mostly fastballs, curves, and changeups. His fastball is definitely his best pitch, which is a little strange considering it averages around 91. He must get a lot of movement.

Edwin Jackson's last start looks okay from the statline, but I thought the start was pretty rocky. Jackson struck out five and walked one, but seemed to be struggling with his control of his fastball throughout the start. He'll get another chance against this decimated Brewers lineup. 

Tuesday: Wily Peralta, RHP (2.48, 68, 3.56, 4.47) vs Travis Wood, LHP (4.27, 120, 4.62 ,4.39) 7:05 PM CT

I'll admit I don't know much about Peralta. He went up the ladder from high-A in 2010 to the starting rotation this year. It looks like much of his (pretty good) minor league numbers are related to a very low home run rate. He can be pretty wild but gets his share of strikeouts. He's a 95 mph fastball-sinker pitcher, which probably explains the home run rate somewhat. He gave up four runs, including a homer, in 5.1 innings against the Rockies in his first start.

Wood was solid in his last start, throwing six innings of shutout ball. I'm struggling to say much more about Travis Wood. He's okay, I guess #thisisayear

Wednesday: Kyle Lohse, RHP (2.86, 92, 3.96, 3.60) vs Scott Feldman, RHP (5.09, 92, 3.87, 3.83), 7:05 PM CT

Lohse was only signed a few weeks ago, thanks to the CBA's latest free agent compensation boondoggle, as well as some pretty high salary demands for a pitcher in his mid thirties. Lohse is another member of the Wandy Rodriguez Hall of Fame. He was mostly terrible during his 5 seasons with the Twins, but reinvented himself as a sinkerballer with Dave Duncan after joining the Cards. He's been solid ever since, aside from 2010 in which he was suffering from a rare elbow malady. 

Feldman was awful in his first start. He gave up four runs in four innings and change, and was lucky that he didn't give up even more. His control was all over the place. I'm really hoping that he's the one who gets squeezed out of the rotation when Garza gets back. Villaneuva seems like the obvious choice for that though, and I wouldn't put Travis Wood out of the question either since the Cubs are likely planning to try and trade Feldman and Villanueva.

Prediction

I think the Cubs win today, but lose the next two. Two pitchers with heavy sinkers against this lineup? At least the Cubs have the prospect of Yuni trying to field those grounders.

Share this Post

Comments

  1. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    @ 26.2cubfan:

    I guess the counter argument regarding sullivan and plagiarism is this: BN has Sun times linked and referenced numerous times throughout the article, so its being attributed and essentially summarizing the article. For someone like me, who is not going to get on the ST website under nearly any circumstance, at least I’m clicking through sometimes to see the article that I otherwise would not have know even existed. Sullivan is getting page hits when his articles get summarized and linked.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. dmick89

    According to the first sentence that interested me on wikipedia, there doesn’t appear to be a legal definition of plagiarism.

    Although plagiarism in some contexts is considered theft or stealing, the concept does not exist in a legal sense. “Plagiarism” is not mentioned in any current statute, either criminal or civil.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. dmick89

    Rice Cube wrote:

    Some Trib articles are also behind a paywall, not sure about Sun-Times though. So they’re losing direct hits and revenue if the buck stops at BN.

    Is there any legal action the Tribune could take? And if so, why wouldn’t they do that, as opposed to making the claim that they did?

    This just seems like petty bullshit to me. I saw Brett was going to respond in some post or something, but I kind of wish he wouldn’t. I know he needs to be more friendly with these guys than we do, but I don’t see how this turns out well for him. I would guess that if a journalist like Sullivan throws that word around that he’s made up his mind and won’t change it. Not to mention, I don’t think there’s any reason to want Sullivan on your side.

    /$0.02

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    @ dmick89:

    Yea, I think plagiarism is more of an academic concept where one passes of concepts or writing as their own without referencing the original source. That doesn’t seem to me like what Brett did. But i don’t really care; I’m not going to bother reading Sullivan or Wittenmeyer anyway.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. Rice Cube

    I don’t think Brett has ever taken a pay article like one from ESPN Insider or the like and just copy/pasted the whole thing out in public. So I doubt they can get him for stuff like that. If he just tells people the gist of something and leads them to the source, more power to the source and I can’t foresee anyone giving him trouble. But Brett’s the lawyer, not me (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. GBTS

    Rice Cube wrote:

    @ Recalcitrant Blogger Nate:
    Some Trib articles are also behind a paywall, not sure about Sun-Times though. So they’re losing direct hits and revenue if the buck stops at BN.
    @ dmick89:
    We need a GBTS signal.

    Plagiarism is not a legal concept, but “plagiarizing” someone in an academic sense could certainly result in a violation of copyright.

    As someone who went to school for journalism, worked very briefly in the journalism field, and is now heavily involved in academic publishing, making a public accusation that tosses out the P-word is really serious and borderline defamatory, based on who the target is. I really hope Sullivan has more in his arsenal than just “He summarizes my articles and provides a link that not enough people are clicking.”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. dmick89

    @ Recalcitrant Blogger Nate:
    Several years ago (2006?) Will Carroll sent me an email asking me to remove something I had quoted. He felt I quoted too much and I went ahead and removed it. He didn’t complain on twitter or facebook or anything. I just don’t get why Sullivan didn’t handle it privately. Then again, I have no idea what kind of relationship they have. I would not expect Sullivan to handle any issue with me (ACB or this blog) privately. He would complain to HJE instead as he did in the past.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. dmick89

    GBTS wrote:

    making a public accusation that tosses out the P-word is really serious and borderline defamatory

    That’s what I was thinking. I think Sully is a piece of garbage that would stoop to the lowest levels, but any journalist throwing that word around is a serious accusation.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. GBTS

    Pay no attention to the fact that the guy talking about copyright law has a Photoshopped avatar of a person pulled from a commercial website.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. dmick89

    Doesn’t MLBTR exist almost solely because of what other people have reported? I don’t get to read as much of Brett’s stuff as I might like, but I’ve never thought he was at MLBTR’s level, which is basically just an rss feed for tons of sites.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. Brett

    Just want to make sure Myles sees my comment in the previous thread. I got no beef in the least.

    On the Sullivan thing, I’ll be writing out my thoughts. He was not accusing me of a specific instance of plagiarism (nor have I ever even remotely approached such a thing – or a copyright violation, for that matter). He was just beefing generically. Though I’m not thrilled with his choice of words.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. Brett

    Oh, and for the record …

    If all I did at BN was copy/paste, link other people, etc., I suspect BN wouldn’t survive very long. I do quite a bit more than that, but thoughtful aggregation of other reports is absolutely an important part of what I do.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. Myles

    Brett wrote:

    Just want to make sure Myles sees my comment in the previous thread. I got no beef in the least.
    On the Sullivan thing, I’ll be writing out my thoughts. He was not accusing me of a specific instance of plagiarism (nor have I ever even remotely approached such a thing – or a copyright violation, for that matter). He was just beefing generically. Though I’m not thrilled with his choice of words.

    Good to know. Thanks for clearing it up, and you know I still love your work. I unfollowed Paul so I guess I’m on #teambrett

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. GBTS

    @ dmick89:
    It’s coming along nicely. It’s across the street from a T.G.I.Fridays and we have a reciprocal agreement where we recommend clients to one another.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. WaLi

    I have seen the shift not work out lately. It stinks because I know there are numbers behind the shift, but the first hit today the 2B was shifted towards 1B and on the next hit the SS was shifted towards 3B. I feel like a few hits vs the Braves were like that too. Then again, the human brain likes to remember when shit doesn’t work, not when it works out.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    The Cubs are miserable. I probably can’t pay attention to the MLB team this year. When will they be good again, 2015? ugh

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. 26.2cubfan

    On the “P” word, you’re all right that giving credit to a source and adding the link means it’s no longer plagiarism, but if one of my students turned in a paper with a big copy and paste from a web article and a citation and 2 sentences of their own analysis, I’m still going to fail them.

    I’m not trying to defend Sully’s accusations here Bret, but it did strike me in the Wrigley Renovations article that you had quoted too much and not done enough of your own interpretation. I know you wanted to get the article up quickly because it’s a pressing matter. It could, however, serve as a chance for reflection on your process. Also, as MB stated above, if your quote is too big, it prevents someone like me from clicking through the link. Give credit (and click throughs) where it’s due, even if it is to the Sun Times or Trib. In this instance, the Sun Times had some valuable info and it deserved recognition.

    /$0.02

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. Brett

    26.2cubfan wrote:

    On the “P” word, you’re all right that giving credit to a source and adding the link means it’s no longer plagiarism, but if one of my students turned in a paper with a big copy and paste from a web article and a citation and 2 sentences of their own analysis, I’m still going to fail them.
    I’m not trying to defend Sully’s accusations here Bret, but it did strike me in the Wrigley Renovations article that you had quoted too much and not done enough of your own interpretation. I know you wanted to get the article up quickly because it’s a pressing matter. It could, however, serve as a chance for reflection on your process. Also, as MB stated above, if your quote is too big, it prevents someone like me from clicking through the link. Give credit (and click throughs) where it’s due, even if it is to the Sun Times or Trib. In this instance, the Sun Times had some valuable info and it deserved recognition.
    /$0.02

    I don’t disagree with any of the essence of your point, and I appreciate the thoughtful take. I disagree with your take on the specifics of that particular article or the thousands that preceded it, but it’s absolutely an opportunity to reflect. Appreciated.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. Brett

    Myles wrote:

    Brett wrote:
    Just want to make sure Myles sees my comment in the previous thread. I got no beef in the least.
    On the Sullivan thing, I’ll be writing out my thoughts. He was not accusing me of a specific instance of plagiarism (nor have I ever even remotely approached such a thing – or a copyright violation, for that matter). He was just beefing generically. Though I’m not thrilled with his choice of words.

    Good to know. Thanks for clearing it up, and you know I still love your work. I unfollowed Paul so I guess I’m on #teambrett

    Much love. As lame as it sounds, I honestly think I just got busy around that time.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. dmick89

    First time I’ve been to Tribune’s site in a long time, but I couldn’t pass up the opportunity to do this.

    Chicago Cubs President Theo Epstein sizes up the team’s slow start.
    By dmick89 Paul Sullivan, Tribune idiot

    1:02 p.m. CDT, April 8, 2013

    Chicago Cubs President Theo Epstein had no update on the Wrigley Field renovation plan before the home opener Monday.

    “The guys who are in the midst of the negotiation say there is a lot of momentum, and obviously wouldn’t keep talking if they weren’t close (to an agreement),” Epstein said. “They’re still talking. They’re still hopeful we get a deal done. There’s still time to get a deal done, so we’ll see what happens.”

    Epstein said more night games would “be nice,” but mostly because it would add to their TV revenues, not for the players’ body clock adjustments.

    The Cubs have an opt-out clause in their WGN-TV contract after 2014.

    “It really would help from a revenue standpoint with a (new) TV deal,” he said. “Competitively, we’ll adjust to anything. I think the day games can be a competitive advantage for us because we can adjust to it. So it’s more about revenue than it is about competitiveness, but it’d be nice to have the flexibility to do that, certainly.”

    Epstein called the Cubs’ 2-4 start “disappointing,” but said he was encouraged by the starting pitching.

    “Early returns are good on that front,” he said. “Offensively, we just didn’t get it going. We just didn’t get quality at-bats. We didn’t get into hitters’ counts, and when we did, we didn’t drive fastballs. But it’s a small sample size and obviously we’re going to get better offensively than we’ve been. And losing a game late is always tough, especially early in the season.

    “The rollercoaster of emotions tends to be more extreme early in the season no matter how long you’ve been in the game. You can’t help but overemphasize that and it’s important to take a step back and try to get some perspective. We very easily could’ve been 4-2 on that road trip. To come back 2-4 is disappointing. Hopefully this starting pitching will continue and we have a nice homestand.”

    Epstein said he was “completely supportive” of manager Dale Sveum’s decision to replace Carlos Marmol as closer with Kyuji Fujikawa.

    “I think he’s made the right calls,” he said. “Marmol bounced back last year to have a really solid second half, and of course he should’ve started the year as our closer. You don’t lose your job because of two bad outings at the end of spring training. To do that would run counter to everything we believe in. Spring training is not a good time to evaluate.

    “But he pitched really poorly three times in a row to start the year, and I think it was important to the team to make a change because we need to believe we can win these close games late. That’s really important.”

    Epstein said they were “open” to the possibility of Marmol returning to the role, and called it a “positive step for Marmol in the sense that maybe he can fix himself” in low pressure situations. Sveum said he would use Marmol when the Cubs are trailing to get his confidence back.

    Epstein said he feels more “comfortable” in the second year, and said he has as much gray hair as he did in Boston.

    “Ten years in Boston will do that to you,” he said. “Lot of blown saves.”

    Epstein recalled in 2003 when the Red Sox blew an opening-day save and two more on the road trip.

    “They might have sprouted back then,” he said. “Not a new development.”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. dmick89

    (dying laughing) @ Castillo trying to get the umpire to call a swing on a batter while the ball has gotten by him and a runner on base. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. Chet Masterson

    @ GW:

    For starters, the starting corner-infield tandem Sunday was Yuniesky Betancourt and Alex Gonzalez. (Read that again.) Injuries to Corey Hart, Mat Gamel, and most recently Aramis Ramirez are partially to blame. But it’s hard to imagine any other team producing such horrific alternatives, even after three significant injuries, even with two of them to very good players

    This amused me. Wait until Jonah sees the Cubs trot out Valbuena and Lillibridge at the corners.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. uncle dave

    I’ve not been paying attention, but is this the first obligatory ninth inning rally of the season?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. SVB

    @ dmick89:
    A little late to the game, but I basically agree with 26.2.

    If you copy/paste someone else’s work and pass it off as your own, it is plagiarism. Copyright is a separate but related issue. If a student does it as a term paper, for example, it would never be published, so it isn’t a copyright violation, but it is unethical and plagiarism. In my classes they fail the assignment with no option to make it up and the second time they fail the class. Our student code of conduct says they can be expelled, but I don’t go that far because I know I won’t be backed up by the admin in a fight like this. (Plus they are likely to fail the course anyway.) If you do it for a research pub, you are plagiarizing the author, but not the copyright is probably held by the publisher and not the author (in science writing–not sure in other fields) so the copyright violation is against Thomsen Reuters Blackwell et al., or whoever.

    I edited a special issue of a journal once and discovered a submission had been 42% plagiarized from another source, based on wordcount in MS word. No citation of the original author. We obviously rejected the manuscript and banned him from publishing in our journal.

    Brett’s article wasn’t plagiarism because it was sourced and linked. It did heavily lean on a lengthy quote. He could have just posted a subset of the bulleted points, I suppose. I think the idea that an aggregator should entice readers to click through has merit, but honestly I have no idea where to draw the line to determine the standard.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment