OV Pic of the Day: Lazy Soriano Only Triples While Pena, Ramirez Hit Homeruns

In News And Rumors by aisle424Leave a Comment

Aramis Ramirez and Carlos Pena got the memo that the pressure is off, so they went about their business of hitting meaningless homeruns.  But Alfonso Soriano couldn’t be bothered to even do that.  He settled for a measly triple and then laid down in the middle of the game.

PoD_8-11-11

Way to earn your money, pal.

I shouldn’t be too rough on him though, since he does have a lot of money and he could theoretically buy a whole bunch of stuff from our OV Shop if they caught his fancy.  It could happen.  He already seems to like the Darwinning shirt:

SorianoSeesDarwinning


Share this Post

Comments

  1. Aisle424

    [quote name=Rice Cube]That is a pretty epic find.[/quote]
    Megan tweeted the photo and mentioned she was in it with the OV shirt. It took me awhile to find her, but there she was (mostly) with Soriano looking right at her.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. mb21

    [quote name=melissa](dying laughing) Love Sori’s laser beam focus.[/quote]I like how it has an arrow.

    Did you see I changed the comment notification for you? (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. melissa

    [quote name=mb21]I like how it has an arrow.

    Did you see I changed the comment notification for you? (dying laughing)[/quote]
    Actually, never noticed so I’ll check it, now.

    /edit Nice edit and thanks for your dedication to accuracy. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. mb21

    [quote name=melissa]Actually, never noticed so I’ll check it, now.

    /edit Nice edit and thanks for your dedication to accuracy. (dying laughing)[/quote]We strive for perfection here at OV.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. bubblesdachimp

    jimcallisBA Jim Callis
    #Cubs deal w/7th-rder Trevor Gretzky is official. Calif HS 1B/son of Wayne got $375k, has projectable power. San Diego St recruit. #mlbdraft

    I didnt see this mentioned here before. But good for the Cubs.

    If we get this, maples, vogelbach, and the 5’9 texas kid that brings he ruckus locked up i will give te draft an A+

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. bubblesdachimp

    I dont get why darwin barney is playing everyday at this point. He hasnt done shit with the bat in two months.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. ZappBrannigan

    [quote name=bubblesdachimp]I dont get why darwin barney is playing everyday at this point. He hasnt done shit with the bat in two months.[/quote]
    He’s the new Kosuke

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=bubblesdachimp]If we get this, maples, vogelbach, and the 5’9 texas kid that brings he ruckus locked up i will give te draft an A+[/quote]
    How good can he be if he didn’t commit to an SEC school, though?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=GW]http://tamu.rivals.com/[/quote]
    Their BOR meeting to reportedly discuss this isn’t until Aug. 22. I don’t see how anything can be officially official until then.

    I saw another rumor that the Big 10 has offered Texas already. Doesn’t seem legit, though.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. Berselius

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]Their BOR meeting to reportedly discuss this isn’t until Aug. 22. I don’t see how anything can be officially official until then.

    I saw another rumor that the Big 10 has offered Texas already. Doesn’t seem legit, though.[/quote]
    If the B12 blows up, where do you think everyone ends up?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=Berselius]If the B12 blows up, where do you think everyone ends up?[/quote]
    I think it depends on Texas. If Texas goes to the Big 10 with ND, I’d think OU would go to the SEC. Then Tech and Baylor would probably go to the MAC or whatever. The Kansas schools might end up in the Big East. Shit, I don’t know about the north schools.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. Berselius

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]http://northwestern.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=57&tid=161240718&mid=161240718&sid=901&style=2[/quote]

    Texas wishes to join the Big Ten with its Longhorn Network, as a non-participant in the Big Ten Network. This scenario remains feasible.

    Don’t they stand to make far more money with BTN?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=Berselius]Don’t they stand to make far more money with BTN?[/quote]
    I don’t know. The latest revenue projections are MUCH higher than they were before. But Texas really has a boner for this network and it’s so far along that I don’t think they’d abandon it now. I’m sure they could work out some kind of deal to co-exist, especially since the LHN only applies to home games.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. Dr. Aneus Taint

    You know, you are real close to being out of here.

    You think using an acronym (gfy) is OK here?

    It’s not. One more transgression, you’re done.

    by Al Yellon on Aug 11, 2011 5:55 PM CDT upreply 1 recs

    .

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. Berselius

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]I don’t know. The latest revenue projections are MUCH higher than they were before. But Texas really has a boner for this network and it’s so far along that I don’t think they’d abandon it now. I’m sure they could work out some kind of deal to co-exist, especially since the LHN only applies to home games.[/quote]
    From what I remember UT has no monetary stake in the network. National carriers are going to want all of the big games anyway – how many UT games was LHN going to air each year anyway? I always thought it was one or two of the nonconf games.

    Given all the kerfuffle over high school games and the fact that UT has no monetary stake in it it might be easier to spin it off to ESPN to become the Texas high school sports network.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=Berselius]From what I remember UT has no monetary stake in the network. National carriers are going to want all of the big games anyway – how many UT games was LHN going to air each year anyway? I always thought it was one or two of the nonconf games.

    Given all the kerfuffle over high school games and the fact that UT has no monetary stake in it it might be easier to spin it off to ESPN to become the Texas high school sports network.[/quote]
    Texas is going to get one or MAYBE two home non-con games with little national interest. They’re going to air more baseball and basketball games as well as classic football games, coaching commentary and university programming.

    Texas will earn a pretty penny through the network, but it’s more about brand marketing for them, imo.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. mb22

    [quote name=bubblesdachimp]I dont get why darwin barney is playing everyday at this point. He hasnt done shit with the bat in two months.[/quote]You guys are odd. (dying laughing) You want Tyler colvin and his league worst wOBA to play every day and then wonder why Darwin Barney is playing every day.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. WaLi

    [quote name=mb22]You guys are odd. (dying laughing) You want Tyler colvin and his league worst wOBA to play every day and then wonder why Darwin Barney is playing every day.[/quote]
    In fairness to Tyler Colvin, there are a few pitchers who have worse wOBA (dying laughing) But OTOH, Zambrano has almost .200 more.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. Tyler Colvin

    [quote name=mb22]You guys are odd. (dying laughing) You want Tyler colvin and his league worst wOBA to play every day and then wonder why Darwin Barney is playing every day.[/quote]gfy

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. bubblesdachimp

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]How good can he be if he didn’t commit to an SEC school, though?[/quote]
    Good call. Probably shouldn’t throw money at him since he didn’t go to the back to back national title winning gamecocks

    [quote name=mb22]You guys are odd. (dying laughing) You want Tyler colvin and his league worst wOBA to play every day and then wonder why Darwin Barney is playing every day.[/quote]
    This does seem like a weird situation. I for one want to see tyler in extended at bats to see if he sucks or not. I mean he probaly sucks but I am not positive. I know barney is a bench player

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. Aisle424

    [quote name=Tyler Colvin]gfy[/quote]
    You know, you are real close to being out of here.

    You think using an acronym (gfy) is OK here?

    It’s not. One more transgression, you’re done.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. mb22

    Texas, along with the LHN, to the Big Ten makes no sense. Texas wouldn’t get any money from the BTN, which is over $8 million and continuing to increase as they add more subscribers and pay off FOX. The ABC/ESPN and other tv contracts would be split evenly among the members, but Texas is going to be getting so much less in television revenue than even a school like Northwestern. The LHN isn’t going to produce revenue over $8 million. They have to split it with ESPN first of all and the BTN has 8 to 10 states in its footprint already. It’s larger than the LHN and the Big Ten owns more of the network and therefore more of the profits. It doesn’t make any sense why Texas would do that.

    There is no LHN if they joined the Big Ten. I don’t even believe that they’d even entertain the idea of it still existing. The Big Ten has been about financial fairness for so long that it’s the one thing I’m certain they’ll demand continues. The Big Ten won’t allow members to make more in tv contracts than others and that’s what allowing Texas to have the LHN creates. The other members make way more money than Texas. They won’t like it that Northwestern is getting more money in tv contracts than they are and the Big Ten won’t like it because it goes against everything they believe in.

    Add in the fact that it’s quite likely that Notre Dame joins the conference at some point and the BTN goes national. The members of the Big Ten will see their current revenue from it more than double by that time. I don’t know why Texas would even want that.

    If the LHN is something they feel they have to have, they’ll go to the Pac 12. There’s as much chance the Big Ten takes Texas and the LHN as there is that they go after Middle Tennessee State. Or my high school.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. gfy

    [quote name=Aisle424]You know, you are real close to being out of here.

    You think using an acronym (gfy) is OK here?

    It’s not. One more transgression, you’re done.[/quote]
    Fuck You!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. Aisle424

    [quote name=bubblesdachimp]This does seem like a weird situation. I for one want to see tyler in extended at bats to see if he sucks or not. I mean he probaly sucks but I am not positive. I know barney is a bench player[/quote]
    Tyler has had 549 career plate appearances and Barney 492. If we know Barney is a bench player based on that, then I think we can draw the same conclusion that Colvin sucks without giving him even more playing time.

    I’m not saying he shouldn’t play or should play, but at this point, Colvin and Barney are pretty much at the same stage of evaluation based on playing time, so the philosophy for one should probably be similar as well.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  25. mb22

    [quote name=Aisle424]Tyler has had 549 career plate appearances and Barney 492. If we know Barney is a bench player based on that, then I think we can draw the same conclusion that Colvin sucks without giving him even more playing time.

    I’m not saying he shouldn’t play or should play, but at this point, Colvin and Barney are pretty much at the same stage of evaluation based on playing time, so the philosophy for one should probably be similar as well.[/quote]I may be wrong, but I think Colvin has more PA in the minor leagues, too. Plus, he’s a corner outfielder and his hitting has to be superior in order to be of much value while Barney still plays a premium position. Both are probably bench players, but you don’t need as much offense from Barney.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  26. JMan

    [quote name=mb22]I may be wrong, but I think Colvin has more PA in the minor leagues, too. Plus, he’s a corner outfielder and his hitting has to be superior in order to be of much value while Barney still plays a premium position. Both are probably bench players, but you don’t need as much offense from Barney.[/quote]I think the issue is more that Quade is doing the opposite of what Hendry stated was the reason for trading Fukudome. I think Colvin is a 4th OF but that still doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be given a chance to prove he can do more. The problem is that he is losing out to Reed Johnson. the ultimate 4th OF.
    What’s probably closer to the truth is that there was zero intention of playing Colvin full-time but rather just giving him Fukudome’s playing time which was 4 days a week or so depending on the pitching match-up. These two are likely going to be a platoon in LF next year with Byrd/jackson as the other starters.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  27. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=mb22]Texas, along with the LHN, to the Big Ten makes no sense. Texas wouldn’t get any money from the BTN, which is over $8 million and continuing to increase as they add more subscribers and pay off FOX. The ABC/ESPN and other tv contracts would be split evenly among the members, but Texas is going to be getting so much less in television revenue than even a school like Northwestern. The LHN isn’t going to produce revenue over $8 million. They have to split it with ESPN first of all and the BTN has 8 to 10 states in its footprint already. It’s larger than the LHN and the Big Ten owns more of the network and therefore more of the profits. It doesn’t make any sense why Texas would do that.

    There is no LHN if they joined the Big Ten. I don’t even believe that they’d even entertain the idea of it still existing. The Big Ten has been about financial fairness for so long that it’s the one thing I’m certain they’ll demand continues. The Big Ten won’t allow members to make more in tv contracts than others and that’s what allowing Texas to have the LHN creates. The other members make way more money than Texas. They won’t like it that Northwestern is getting more money in tv contracts than they are and the Big Ten won’t like it because it goes against everything they believe in.

    Add in the fact that it’s quite likely that Notre Dame joins the conference at some point and the BTN goes national. The members of the Big Ten will see their current revenue from it more than double by that time. I don’t know why Texas would even want that.

    If the LHN is something they feel they have to have, they’ll go to the Pac 12. There’s as much chance the Big Ten takes Texas and the LHN as there is that they go after Middle Tennessee State. Or my high school.[/quote]
    The latest projection I saw for the LHN was $10-12 million per year over the next couple of years. I’ll see if I can find the link.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  28. Dr. Aneus Taint

    By the way, Pac 12’s Larry Scott has repeatedly no commented questions about further expansion in the last week.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  29. bubblesdachimp

    Who would come to SEC with A&M?

    I have heard UF would do its best to block FSU…

    UNC?Clemson? UCF?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  30. Berselius

    [quote name=bubblesdachimp]Who would come to SEC with A&M?

    I have heard UF would do its best to block FSU…

    UNC?Clemson? UCF?[/quote]
    Oklahoma

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  31. ACT

    [quote name=WaLi]In fairness to Tyler Colvin, there are a few pitchers who have worse wOBA (dying laughing) But OTOH, Zambrano has almost .200 more.[/quote]Zambrano has a higher wOBA than Albert Pujols.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  32. bubblesdachimp

    [quote name=Berselius]Oklahoma[/quote]

    (dying laughing)
    (dying laughing)
    (dying laughing)

    We would have to change the divisions up.. I nominate the Rednecks and Retards conferences….

    If we were to add OU and A&M we should have an automatic bert to the National title every year for the winner of the SEC

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  33. WenningtonsGorillaCock

    [quote name=ACT]Zambrano has a higher wOBA than Albert Pujols.[/quote]
    You know, you are real close to being out of here.

    You think using an acronym (wOBA) is OK here?

    It’s not. One more transgression, you’re done.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  34. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=Berselius]Oklahoma[/quote]
    OU is perfect for the SEC, though I’m sure they’d prefer the Pac 12.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  35. mb22

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]The latest projection I saw for the LHN was $10-12 million per year over the next couple of years. I’ll see if I can find the link.[/quote]Unless there are $400 subscriber fees, I don’t buy that. I think Texas will be lucky to take in $1-2 million and that may not be for 4-5 years. You have to have something to televise to get people to watch and they don’t have shit. They can’t show high school games (NCAA said no way), the only football games they may have are against teams that advertisers aren’t going to pay much for. Basketball is going to be the biggest revenue source and advertisers aren’t going to be throwing money around for the unimportant games either.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  36. bubblesdachimp

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]Another rumor: If aggy joins the SEC, FSU will join as well.[/quote]
    I have heard that as well i have also read some shit that UF could potentially and WOULD block that

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  37. Berselius

    I think you’re underrating subscriber fees, mb. That’s where cable networks earn their money. Almost all cable networks (especially RSNs) have such a tiny market slice that the subscriber fees keep them afloat. How many people watch all the random shit that BTN shows when they don’t have live sports?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  38. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=mb22]Unless there are $400 subscriber fees, I don’t buy that. I think Texas will be lucky to take in $1-2 million and that may not be for 4-5 years. You have to have something to televise to get people to watch and they don’t have shit. They can’t show high school games (NCAA said no way), the only football games they may have are against teams that advertisers aren’t going to pay much for. Basketball is going to be the biggest revenue source and advertisers aren’t going to be throwing money around for the unimportant games either.[/quote]
    http://blogs.houstonpress.com/hairballs/2011/01/the_longhorn_network_-_the_300.php

    Originally forecast to generate between $3 million and $5 million per year for the school, a bidding war between Fox and ESPN drove the annual rights fees up to the $15 million announced today.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  39. mb22

    [quote name=Berselius]I think you’re underrating subscriber fees, mb. That’s where cable networks earn their money. Almost all cable networks (especially RSNs) have such a tiny market slice that the subscriber fees keep them afloat. How many people watch all the random shit that BTN shows when they don’t have live sports?[/quote]Advertising, b. If you don’t have anyone willing to advertise, you don’t make any money. Subscriber fees helps you keep the channel active, and in large enough markets creates a profit, but television is about advertising. Who the fuck is going to advertise for the shit on that network? Some may buy spots for the 1-2 football games they have and some of the basketball games even, but they’re going to be at such reduced prices that there will be little revenue.

    The startup costs for a network are tremendous and even if Texas didn’t foot the bill, they sure as hell aren’t seeing profits until ESPN gets their money back. I could see $10-12 million overall, but 90% of that is going to ESPN. They own it. They’re keeping most of it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  40. Berselius

    [quote name=mb22]Advertising, b. If you don’t have anyone willing to advertise, you don’t make any money. Subscriber fees helps you keep the channel active, and in large enough markets creates a profit, but television is about advertising. Who the fuck is going to advertise for the shit on that network? Some may buy spots for the 1-2 football games they have and some of the basketball games even, but they’re going to be at such reduced prices that there will be little revenue.

    The startup costs for a network are tremendous and even if Texas didn’t foot the bill, they sure as hell aren’t seeing profits until ESPN gets their money back. I could see $10-12 million overall, but 90% of that is going to ESPN. They own it. They’re keeping most of it.[/quote]
    UT owns the rights, ESPN is buying it from them.

    From what I’ve read the way advertising works on cable is if you have shows people want to advertise on (UT games, coaches shows, etc) you can leverage that into buying ads on the less desirable blocks of time. That’s how networks that basically show nothing but crappy reruns can get advertisers for Everybody Loves Raymond reruns.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  41. mb22

    So LHN bankrupt within 2 years. ESPN is retarded if they think they can pay Texas that much money. That network is doomed.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  42. mb22

    [quote name=Berselius]UT owns the rights, ESPN is buying it from them.

    From what I’ve read the way advertising works on cable is if you have shows people want to advertise on (UT games, coaches shows, etc) you can leverage that into buying ads on the less desirable blocks of time. That’s how networks that basically show nothing but crappy reruns can get advertisers for Everybody Loves Raymond reruns.[/quote]
    Of course, but it’s just like the lesser game on the BTN each week. There are shitty ads and they make little money from it. The Big Ten wanted the 9th conference game so they could show more conference games on the network and attract more advertisers. With a 9th game and the 12th team, it makes it more likely that each week they’ll be able to show one of UM, OSU, Nebraska, PSU, Iowa or Wisconsin and those are the teams that advertisers want.

    There’s no way that channel makes it as is. There’s also no way the Big Ten allows them to have it and there’s no way the Pac 10 will allow them to have it without splitting revenue with at least 2 additional universities. No wonder the other teams in the Big 12 are so pissed. Did Texas really think they could do this and keep the Big 12? If they did, they’re dumber than Al Yellon.

    Texas is a great program, but I don’t want anything to do with them in the Big Ten. They will soon have been in two conferences in two decades that have collapsed.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  43. Berselius

    Did Texas really think they could do this and keep the Big 12? If they did, they’re dumber than Al Yellon.

    It was obvious to everyone that the B12 was doomed when Colorado and Nebraska left. This was just Texas getting insurance for itself, because it could.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  44. Dr. Aneus Taint

    Too bad we can’t just reform the old SWC and add OU, OSU and BYU…

    North: OU, OSU, TCU, SMU, Arkansas, BYU
    South: Tech, Texas, Rice, Baylor, Houston, aggy

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  45. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mish]Dave Cameron vs Cancer

    [/quote]
    I particularly liked the leverage bars on the bottom of the graph. Seems like smooth sailing for Mr. Cameron for now. We’ll know within the next 2-5 years whether it stays gone.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  46. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=Berselius]It was obvious to everyone that the B12 was doomed when Colorado and Nebraska left. This was just Texas getting insurance for itself, because it could.[/quote]
    This.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  47. Berselius

    Not only because it could, but because it cost them nothing. It certainly looks like all the risk in that deal is with ESPN

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  48. mb22

    [quote name=Berselius]It was obvious to everyone that the B12 was doomed when Colorado and Nebraska left. This was just Texas getting insurance for itself, because it could.[/quote]Yeah, good point. No reason not to do what they did, but it’s still funny to me that they even tried to go forward. It was more fucked than I realized. Had I known how much Texas was getting I’d have said it won’t last a year. It didn’t last one game.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  49. WaLi

    What the hell does this mean?

    Copyright © 2011 Obstructed View
    stercus ad temere intempestivo temporibus

    Google translated this in Latin to:
    dung to the ill-timed at random times

    Although it detects it is in Galician (wherever the hell that is spoken)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  50. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=WaLi]What the hell does this mean?
    Google translated this in Latin to:
    dung to the ill-timed at random times
    [/quote]
    It means: Shit’s comin’.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  51. binky

    [quote name=WaLi]What the hell does this mean?

    Google translated this in Latin to:
    dung to the ill-timed at random times

    Although it detects it is in Galician (wherever the hell that is spoken)[/quote]Shit at horribly inopportune times?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  52. Berselius

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]Apparently Baylor is going all in to keep aggy in the Big 12-2.[/quote]
    They’re going all-in with their stack of pennies? (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  53. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=Berselius]They’re going all-in with their stack of pennies? (dying laughing)[/quote]
    I hope, but probably with the legislature.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  54. Berselius

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]http://blog.mysanantonio.com/aggies/2011/08/aggies-out-uh-in-for-the-big-12/

    (dying laughing)[/quote]

    Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe has told Texas A&M that Texas holds the key to the long-term future of the Big 12, and that the Big 12 would survive without the Aggies

    (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  55. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]http://blog.mysanantonio.com/aggies/2011/08/aggies-out-uh-in-for-the-big-12/

    (dying laughing)[/quote]
    Next, let’s replace OU and OSU with the University of Phoenix and the Alabama Institute of Buttfucking and call it a day.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  56. Berselius

    Lee Evans ————> Baltimore.

    Awesome! Glad he finally gets to work with a real offense (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  57. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]Alabama Institute of Buttfucking.[/quote]
    You’ll never guess what their mascot is.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  58. Berselius

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]Next, let’s replace OU and OSU with the University of Phoenix and the Alabama Institute of Buttfucking and call it a day.[/quote]
    I don’t think the University of Alabama wants to leave the SEC, Ryno.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  59. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=Berselius]I don’t think the University of Alabama wants to leave the SEC, Ryno.[/quote]
    Full disclosure: I was going to say their mascot was the Crimson Tide if anyone asked.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  60. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=Berselius]Lee Evans ————> Baltimore.

    Awesome! Glad he finally gets to work with a real offense (dying laughing)[/quote]
    4th rounder.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  61. Dr. Aneus Taint

    Rumors of Texas talking to the ACC. Could be for non-rev sports, which would signal Big 10+2 or independence for football.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  62. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]Rumors of Texas talking to the ACC. Could be for non-rev sports, which would signal Big 10+2 or independence for football.[/quote]
    That is a bit weird unless you count the Gulf of Mexico as an offshoot of the Atlantic Ocean.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  63. Berselius

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]Rumors of Texas talking to the ACC. Could be for non-rev sports, which would signal Big 10+2 or independence for football.[/quote]
    Do you think Texas could make a competitive schedule with enough home games as an independent, Ryno? They’ll obviously still play OU and aTm each year, but aside from Notre Dame I don’t know how many teams would want to schedule OOC games in Austin

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  64. Aisle424

    [quote name=WaLi]What the hell does this mean?

    Google translated this in Latin to:
    dung to the ill-timed at random times

    Although it detects it is in Galician (wherever the hell that is spoken)[/quote]
    I think it was the closest Latin translation of “Random Shit at Inopportune Times” or something like that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  65. Rice Cube

    Whoops:

    Major League Baseball suspended Chicago Cubs minor league catcher Luis Flores 50 games after testing positive for Methylhexaneamine, a stimulant.

    The suspension of Flores, who plays for the Double-A Tennessee Smokies, is effective immediately.

    Flores, 24, is batting .275 with seven home runs and 20 RBIs in 40 games with the Smokies. He was a seventh-round pick of the Cubs in the 2008 draft.

    He didn’t get good enough drugs to escape detection.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  66. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=Berselius]Do you think Texas could make a competitive schedule with enough home games as an independent, Ryno? They’ll obviously still play OU and aTm each year, but aside from Notre Dame I don’t know how many teams would want to schedule OOC games in Austin[/quote]
    I would think we could get OU, ND, BYU and (maybe) aggy every year. Probably Tech and Baylor as well.

    I know we have home and homes with USC and Cal coming up. Arkansas is on the schedule soon too. I wouldn’t be too concerned with the schedule.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  67. The Wreckard

    [quote name=Berselius]If the B12 blows up, where do you think everyone ends up?[/quote]Iowa State would go to the Iowa Intercollegiate Athletic Conference.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  68. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=GBTS]Iowa State would go to the Iowa Intercollegiate Wheelchair Buttfucking Conference.[/quote].

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  69. Berselius

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]http://www.theonion.com/articles/with-163-average-adam-dunn-no-longer-considered-a,21121/[/quote]

    Dunn would now be called what the league refers to as a ‘baseball participant.’

    (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  70. GW

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]http://blog.mysanantonio.com/aggies/2011/08/aggies-out-uh-in-for-the-big-12/

    (dying laughing)[/quote]
    savvy move by the aggies to promote the idea of UH joining. gets a portion of the lege on their side (and further fucks the b12 were it to actually happen).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  71. The Wreckard

    Big 12 commissioner Dan Beebe has told Texas A&M that Texas holds the key to the long-term future of the Big 12, and that the Big 12 would survive without the Aggies

    I love that Don Beebe is the commissioner of the Buffalo Bills of athletic conferences.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  72. The Wreckard

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]http://www.theonion.com/articles/with-163-average-adam-dunn-no-longer-considered-a,21121/[/quote]Every time I see something about Dunn I check his stats and am just floored by how awful he’s been this year. Even though I know to expect it, I’m still surprised every time I look at it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  73. WaLi

    [quote name=The Wreckard]Every time I see something about Dunn I check his stats and am just floored by how awful he’s been this year. Even though I know to expect it, I’m still surprised every time I look at it.[/quote]His OPS+ is still 3 times that of Colvin (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  74. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=GW]savvy move by the aggies to promote the idea of UH joining. gets a portion of the lege on their side (and further fucks the b12 were it to actually happen).[/quote]
    They could promote my dick as a replacement, but I doubt it happens.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  75. GBTS

    [quote name=josh]Hosmer in KC has made Ka’aihue obsolete. He puts up killer numbers in triple A. Might be a worthy trade target.[/quote]I agree, trade Reed and Vitters for Hosmer. Don’t give them Barney though.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  76. Berselius

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]They could promote my dick as a replacement, but I doubt it happens.[/quote]
    They only want the top CFB prospect school, not the number three one

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  77. Berselius

    [quote name=GBTS]I agree, trade Reed and Vitters for Hosmer. Don’t give them Barney though.[/quote]
    That deal might take Campana to get it done, GBTS. Might be too much.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  78. Mish

    [quote name=Berselius]Lineup today vs LHP Mike Minor

    Castro
    Johnson
    Rodrigo
    Soto
    Peenya
    Adolfo
    Baker
    Z[/quote]
    The ol’ 8 man lineup I see.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  79. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=Berselius]They only want the top CFB prospect school, not the number three one[/quote]
    My dick could produce a ton of NFL talent.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  80. WaLi

    [quote name=Berselius]They only want the top CFB prospect school, not the number three one[/quote]you mean one and thirty?

    /grrm’d

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  81. GW

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]They could promote my dick as a replacement, but I doubt it happens.[/quote]

    yeah, virtually no chance. but it provides political cover

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  82. GW

    bubbles, i didn’t know you were graduating from A&M

    RT@LopezOnSports: A&M prez Loftin stepped up to the mike at graduation a while ago and jam-packed Reed Arena broke into chant of S-E-C. Wow.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  83. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=GW]yeah, virtually no chance. but it provides political cover[/quote]
    This conference’s only shot was to try to recreate the SWC. If aggy leaves, they might as well start shopping for conferences.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  84. binky

    [quote name=Berselius]That deal might take Campana to get it done, GBTS. Might be too much.[/quote]Can you guys post a list of topics I’m not supposed to discuss or something?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment