•   Follow us
  •   Become a fan
  •   Contact
  •   RSS
  • Free Agent signings from last year

    The Cubs weren't very active last winter and the moves they made were relatively safe. They placed their bets on the likes of Paul Maholm, Reed Johnson and David DeJesus so as far as safe bets go, these are about as safe as it gets. Perhaps the Cubs ought to look into more sports betting online ideas to help improve even more.

    On November 30, 2011 the Cubs signed DeJesus to a 2-year deal for $10 million. The contract paid him $4.25 million in 2012 and will again pay him the same amount in 2013. The Cubs hold a $6.5 million option for 2015 or they can pay a $1.5 million buyout.

    They essentially paid DeJesus to be worth 2 wins over the 2 gauranteed years of the contract. He hit .263/.350/.403 with a .332 wOBA (104 wRC+). DeJesus was coming off a down season in 2011 and the Cubs figured there was a good chance he would improve. He did.

    His fWAR was 1.7, rWAR 1.6 and WARP 1.0. If he's close to as good as that in 2013, he'll be worth more than the Cubs paid. It's also likely he'll be dealt at the trade deadline if he's having a good season.

    I had expected DeJesus to provide better than average baserunning and defense, but all 3 of the defensive metrics (UZR, DRS, FRAA) were about -4 runs. His UBR was -1. One of the reasons I liked the contract at the time was because the Cubs had a shitty defense for several years and were equally shitty on the bases. I thought for sure he'd help improve the team. The Cubs did improve, but it wasn't because of him.

    All it took to sign Paul Maholm was 2 years and $11.25 million. Maholm's greatest asset to the Cubs was what he brought back in return when he was traded to the Braves in July. Overall though, Maholm had a solid season.

    Despite a 12.8% HR/FB rate, he posted a 3.67 ERA and a 4.00 FIP over 198 innings. It was the second highest innings total in his career (206.1 in 2008). His fWAR was 2.5, rWAR 1.9 and for some reason WARP wasn't too impressed (0.1 WARP).

    The Cubs paid Maholm for a little more than 2 wins over 2 years and he came pretty close to providing that in year one. He was also traded, along with Johnson, for Arodys Vizcaino and Jaye Chapman.

    In 2011 Johnson had a pretty good season in part-time play. It made the decision of whether or not to re-sign him that much easier and the Cubs gave him only $1.15 million. It was  a no-brainer at the time. He's not going to turn a team into a contender, but he's a solid role player.

    He had 266 PA in 2011 and 268 in 2012. This past season he hit .290/.337/.398 with a .322 wOBA (99 wRC+). Johnson was once a good fielder, but those days are past him. He's a below average fielder though not a bad one.

    The Cubs paid Johnson next to nothing. He had a .347 wOBA at the time of the trade. He produced 1.0 fWAR, 0.8 rWAR and .6 WAR while with the Cubs. He didn't perform too well once he went to Atlanta, but he gave the Cubs a lot more than they paid for.

    The front office did well in their free agent signings from a year ago, but they gambled little and as well as the deals turned out, they profited little from them. If Vizcaino can stick as a starter that may change, but most reports I've read say he'll be a reliever at the MLB level.

    When you sign players of this caliber, you can't expect to profit too much, but it's better than looking stupid. We can unfortunately expect more of these deals over the next couple of seasons and maybe even longer depending on the farm system.

    dmick89
    When I awoke, the Dire Wolf, six hundred pounds of sin, Was grinning at my window, all I said was "Come on in"
    dmick89
    2013 MLB Draft: who do you take? http://t.co/KgepCQYmiM - 20 hours ago
    dmick89
    Contact me here

    25 Responses to “Free Agent signings from last year”

    1. Rice Cube 1 Rice Cube says:

      The Scott Baker signing was kind of cool if it works out and he can get traded. I’m very interested to see how much they actually throw at Brandon McCarthy or Marcum. If they make a late push for Zack Greinke I might freak out in a good way before I realize what that would mean financially (dying laughing)

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    2. JonKneeV 2 jtsunami says:

      Brandon McCarthy cleared to throw baseballs again. Maybe signing soon?

      Also:

      Snoop as a pup

      Snoop all grown up

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    3. Suburban kid 3 Suburban kid says:

      They placed their bets on the likes of Paul Maholm, Reed Johnson and David DeJesus so as far as safe bets go, these are about as safe as it gets. Perhaps the Cubs ought to look into more sports betting online ideas to help improve even more.

      What an awesome site, Obstructed View blogger. Thanks for linking to it in your content!

      EDIT:
      /dick

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    4. josh 5 josh says:

      We can unfortunately expect more of these deals over the next couple of seasons.

      Yeah, but….

      Aw!

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    5. Rice Cube 6 Rice Cube says:

      @ josh:
      Comic!

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    6. Suburban kid 7 Suburban kid says:

      @ mb21:
      We’re all gonna get rich!. Lickety clickety

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    7. Suburban kid 8 Suburban kid says:

      The integrated commercial: another media convention invented by Jack Benny.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    8. GBTS 9 GBTS says:

      @ jtsunami:
      This should have been a Dog Shot. Your account has been suspended. Please review the Posting Constitution before posting again: http://www.obstructedview.net/Constitution/ArticleIV_Posting/SectionA_Non_Cubs_Materials/Subsection1_Pictures/e_Animals/ii_Domesticated/aa_Mammals/1_Dogs.html

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    9. mb21 10 mb21 says:

      @ GBTS:
      I like that we have a Constitution. (dying laughing)

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    10. WaLi 11 WaLi says:

      @ mb21:
      Can you please make that link work? (dying laughing)

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    11. Rice Cube 12 Rice Cube says:

      @ WaLi:
      GBTS should totally lawyerize it.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    12. GBTS 13 GBTS says:

      OV Constitution should just be one page that says “Stuff will be posted on occasion, just don’t be a faget and things will be fine.”

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    13. Rice Cube 14 Rice Cube says:

      @ GBTS:
      That is totally lawyerific.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    14. mb21 15 mb21 says:

      @ WaLi:
      click it again

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    15. mb21 16 mb21 says:

      @ GBTS:
      I’m here to serve.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    16. GBTS 18 GBTS says:

      @ mb21:
      (dying laughing)
      (dying laughing)

      I like that it’s under the “Dogs” section.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    17. mb21 19 mb21 says:

      @ GBTS:
      We’re thorough.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    18. GBTS 20 GBTS says:

      Who was the original poster who used the term “faget?” I can’t remember its origin. It wasn’t The Hawk, was it?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    19. GBTS 21 GBTS says:

      Also, today we’re making fake internet constitutions. Another raucous day in Cubdom.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    20. mb21 22 mb21 says:

      @ GBTS:
      Ryno used it in a mocking way. I don’t remember when it was first used, but it just took off.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    21. mb21 23 mb21 says:

      @ GBTS:
      Imagine what we’ll be doing this time next year.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    22. mb21 25 mb21 says:

      I like that it’s 1_Dogs.html, which would imply there might be a 2_Dogs.html and perhaps even more.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Leave a Reply

    RSS Obstructed View Forum