•   Follow us
  •   Become a fan
  •   Contact
  •   RSS
  • Projected 2012 Roster

    cubs-suck_design

    updated 1-13-12

    The 2012 roster is taking shape and it’s not going to be an enjoyable season. The Cubs recently acquired David DeJesus and Ian Stewart. Yesterday they acquired Travis Wood. In the Stewart and Wood trades the Cubs have lost Tyler Colvin, DJ LeMahieu and Sean Marshall. Koyie Hill has been non-tendered and Reed Johnson was re-signed to a one-year contract.

    The Cubs do not appear interested in spending much money this offseason so we already have a pretty good idea what the 2012 Cubs are going to look like. Things may change of course, but as of today this is most likely going to be the opening day roster.

    Catchers: Geovany Soto, Welington Castillo
    1B: Bryan LaHair
    2B: Darwin Barney
    3B: Ian Stewart
    SS: Starlin Castro
    INF: Jeff Baker
    INF: Blake DeWitt
    LF: Alfonso Soriano
    CF: Marlon Byrd
    RF: David DeJesus
    OF: Reed Johnson
    OF: Tony Campana or Dave Sappelt
    SP1: Matt Garza
    SP2: Ryan Dempster
    SP3: Paul Maholm
    SP4: Travis Wood
    SP5: Randy Wells
    SP6: Chris Volstad
    CL: Carlos Marmol
    SU: Kerry Wood (not yet signed)
    Rel: James Russell
    Rel: Scott Maine
    Rel: Jeff Samardzija
    Rel: Manny Corpas

    I’ve assumed the Cubs and Kerry Wood reach an agreement. With Sean Marshall gone the Cubs have some additional money they can use to sign him. Wood wants to return and Theo and Jed want Wood to be a part of the team. Something will get done.

    That’s a really bad offense, OK defense, OK rotation and bad bullpen. Yeah, 2012 is going to suck.


    dmick89
    When I awoke, the Dire Wolf, six hundred pounds of sin, Was grinning at my window, all I said was "Come on in"
    dmick89
    2013 MLB Draft: who do you take? http://t.co/KgepCQYmiM - 1 hour ago
    dmick89
    Contact me here

    93 Responses to “Projected 2012 Roster”

    1. 1 bubblesdachimp says:

      This team is going to be the worst i have ever witnessed. Much worse than 2006.. Unless Lahair is good (doubt it)

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    2. 2 Matt says:

      Samardzija makes the bullpen over one of Dolis/Mateo. Other than that, I agree although I think Beliveau will take Maine’s spot either in spring training or early in the season.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    3. 3 mb21 says:

      I think Beliveau will take Maine’s spot as well. Probably not entering the season though. My guess is they’ll keep him down to get that 7th year of service time. Can’t believe I forgot Samardzija. I initially had him as the 5th starter, but then remembered Zambrano is still on the team.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    4. 4 mb21 says:

      Thanks, Matt. I took out Dolis and put Samardzija in that spot.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    5. 5 Suburban kid says:

      Soto — even numbered year
      LaHair — gonna break out
      Barney brings good D
      Stewart — due to bounce back
      Castro will be even better than last year
      Byrd – contract year
      DeJesus – rejuvenated
      Soriano – sorry, I can’t do this anymore

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    6. 6 Rice Cube says:

      MB, wouldn’t you use Clevenger as the backup since that’s what his ceiling is, and keep Castillo in Iowa until Soto is traded so Castillo becomes the new starter?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    7. 7 Suburban kid says:

      Ugh. Looking at the 2006 roster, and 2012 looks worse.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    8. 8 mb21 says:

      [quote name=Rice Cube]MB, wouldn’t you use Clevenger as the backup since that’s what his ceiling is, and keep Castillo in Iowa until Soto is traded so Castillo becomes the new starter?[/quote]Scouts think both are back-ups from what I’ve read. I know Baseball America has said that.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    9. 9 mb21 says:

      [quote name=Suburban kid]Ugh. Looking at the 2006 roster, and 2012 looks worse.[/quote]At least the 2006 team could say they had a chance if Wood and Prior were healthy. IIRC, pecota had the 2006 Cubs at 84 wins entering the season.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    10. 10 Rice Cube says:

      [quote name=mb21]Scouts think both are back-ups from what I’ve read. I know Baseball America has said that.[/quote]Well, that’s a fun-sucker.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    11. 11 Suburban kid says:

      [quote name=mb21]At least the 2006 team could say they had a chance if Wood and Prior were healthy. IIRC, pecota had the 2006 Cubs at 84 wins entering the season.[/quote]About six months from now, we’re going to be feeling nostalgic about Jacque Jones.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    12. 12 AndCounting says:

      Staring at this list of players, adding Fielder looks like a gigantic waste of money. On this team, he could slug 1.100 and finish the season with 75 RBIs.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    13. 13 WaLi says:

      Are there any examples of large market teams going into a complete 5 year rebuild?

      I can think of the Marlins doing fire sales after they won the WS and rebuildling, but they claim they had a reason to (small baseball market)

      With the new CBA, what’s the downside of getting free agents? Paying more money to put a watchable team on the field? The payroll page as of 12/9 says it wil be $97.8 million. In 2011, that would put us around 13th ranked. What are we doing with the remaining $30 mil? We are a large market team.

      But since we are doing a complete rebuild, why re-sign Johnson on a 1-year deal? Why not fill every position with league minimum players unless a player is in the plans for the future. Might as well hit rock bottom if there are no plans to compete.

      /incoherent rant

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    14. 14 Rice Cube says:

      I think the only downside of getting free agents is potential loss of draft picks due to the new compensation rule (the one-year $12MM deal thing) and the luxury tax. If the Cubs stay in the bottom 10, though, they’ll at least keep their #1 pick (dying laughing)

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    15. 15 Aisle424 says:

      The bullpen doesn’t seem terrible. Russell actually did well in that role last year, Samardzija (as much as I hate to admit it) was decent, I can’t imagine Marmol will be as terrible again this year, Cashner could be a weapon, and Wood will have his flashes of what he once was.

      Having Marshall in there would make it a pretty decent bullpen, but as it stands it’s not bad and could still be good if somebody from the system can fill in those remaining holes.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    16. 16 Aisle424 says:

      The offense is going to be brutal and there are going to be calls for Brett Jackson if he gets off to any sort of start in the minors or even Spring Training.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    17. 17 Aisle424 says:

      Who’s the clean-up hitter? LaHair? I assume Castro is 3rd.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    18. 18 Dr. Aneus Taint says:

      I think the Cubs’ 2012 slogan will be: Did you see Major League?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    19. 19 Rice Cube says:

      Fuck you, Jobu…

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    20. 20 AndCounting says:

      [quote name=Aisle424]Who’s the clean-up hitter? LaHair? I assume Castro is 3rd.[/quote]Thoughts of the batting order genuinely made me laugh.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    21. 21 Dr. Aneus Taint says:

      Catchers: Geovany Soto, Welington Castillo
      1B: Bryan LaHair
      2B: Darwin Barney
      3B: Ian Stewart
      SS: Starlin Castro
      INF: Jeff Baker
      INF: Blake DeWitt
      LF: Alfonso Soriano
      CF: Marlon Byrd
      RF: David DeJesus
      OF: Reed Johnson
      OF: Tony Campana
      SP1: Matt Garza
      SP2: Ryan Dempster
      SP3: Carlos Zambrano
      SP4: Randy Wells
      SP5: Travis Wood
      CL: Carlos Marmol
      SU: Kerry Wood (not yet signed)
      Rel: Andrew Cashner
      Rel: James Russell
      Rel: Scott Maine
      Rel: Jeff Samardzija
      Rel: Marcos Mateo

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    22. 22 Rice Cube says:

      By the way, is that “C-Suck” available on a T-shirt or was it from somewhere else?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    23. 23 Aisle424 says:

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    24. 24 JMan says:

      I assume that Ricketts is paring payroll down for a few years to pay for improvements on or around Wrigley or just pocketing it until they feel ready to dip into the FA market.

      While 2012 is going to suck at least they have a good chance at a top 3 draft pick while hopefully grooming some of the prospects I assume they will be obtaining by trading off the team.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    25. 25 josh says:

      [quote name=Aisle424]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CuWQfMGjZF4[/quote]Even The Janitor from Scrubs thinks the Cubs will lose.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    26. 26 josh says:

      Personally, I’m clinging to the hope that they exceed expectations. And that the Cardinals, Brewers, and Red completely drop the ball. It’s happened before. They could slip in as the worst division leader.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    27. 27 Aisle424 says:

      [quote name=JMan]I assume that Ricketts is paring payroll down for a few years to pay for improvements on or around Wrigley or just pocketing it until they feel ready to dip into the FA market.

      While 2012 is going to suck at least they have a good chance at a top 3 draft pick while hopefully grooming some of the prospects I assume they will be obtaining by trading off the team.[/quote]
      The problem is that, after Garza, nothing left on the team will bring anything of consequence into the system. This isn’t like when the 1997 Marlins got broken up.

      I’ll be interested to know where the money is going. They have stated over and over that the budget for baseball operations would be about the same as last year. They didn’t break it down into how much would be on the major league payroll vs. minor league development, but now they are restricted in how much they can pay in the draft.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    28. 28 WenningtonsGorillaCock says:

      [quote name=Aisle424]The problem is that, after Garza, nothing left on the team will bring anything of consequence into the system. This isn’t like when the 1997 Marlins got broken up.

      I’ll be interested to know where the money is going. They have stated over and over that the budget for baseball operations would be about the same as last year. They didn’t break it down into how much would be on the major league payroll vs. minor league development, but now they are restricted in how much they can pay in the draft.[/quote]Well, they did pay $20 mil for an unlimited supply of Big Macs

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    29. 29 dylanj says:

      1. DeJesus
      2. Barney ?
      3. Castro
      4. LaHair
      5. Soto
      6. Byrd
      7. Soriano
      8. Stewart?

      pretty rough stuff

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    30. 30 dylanj says:

      Soto could bring back a few prospects. Byrd might find you a project arm

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    31. 31 JMan says:

      [quote name=Aisle424]The problem is that, after Garza, nothing left on the team will bring anything of consequence into the system. This isn’t like when the 1997 Marlins got broken up.

      I’ll be interested to know where the money is going. They have stated over and over that the budget for baseball operations would be about the same as last year. They didn’t break it down into how much would be on the major league payroll vs. minor league development, but now they are restricted in how much they can pay in the draft.[/quote]I think Byrd and Marmol could bring a decent return. But Garza is really the only one that can bring impact players in return. Well Castro could but I highly doubt he’s traded.
      I’m curious where the money is going as well but I’d rather they not give Fielder, others a big contract just because they have money to spend.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    32. 32 josh says:

      I’m cautiously optimistic about the draft. It’s not like this is the end of good players being taken in the draft, it just means you have to draft smarter. Maybe the Cubs lose some edge, but they still can add impact players.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    33. 33 AndCounting says:

      One thing I’m wondering: when is the last time the Cubs had a legitimately good defensive team? Nothing’s coming to mind.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    34. 34 dylanj says:

      Byrd, Marmol, Soto and Garza could bring something back.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    35. 35 JMan says:

      I can’t believe the minor leaguers involved in the trade aren’t known yet. Just seems weird.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    36. 36 WaLi says:

      [quote name=dylanj]Byrd, Marmol, Soto and Garza could bring something back.[/quote]

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    37. 37 Aisle424 says:

      [quote name=JMan]I can’t believe the minor leaguers involved in the trade aren’t known yet. Just seems weird.[/quote]
      They were known two months ago so we should find out soon.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    38. 38 Suburban kid says:

      Finally got you a Christmas present, RC.

      http://www.banterist.com/archivefiles/000305.html

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    39. 39 AndCounting says:

      [quote name=AndCounting]One thing I’m wondering: when is the last time the Cubs had a legitimately good defensive team? Nothing’s coming to mind.[/quote]By Total Zone, the 1996 Cubs were the best defensive team the Cubs have ever fielded with no close second. There were no below-average defenders on that team. Sammy Sosa had the highest single season TZ rating of any Cub ever, saving 27 runs. (dying laughing)

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    40. 40 ACT says:

      Marmol won’t get much of anything back, I’m afraid. He’s quite expensive, and his control issues that prevent him from being an elite reliever. I don’t think 1 year of Byrd is worth much, either.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    41. 41 ACT says:

      The Cubs led the league in defensive efficiency rating in 2008. They also lead the league in runs scored (by a lot) and ERA+.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    42. 42 AndCounting says:

      [quote name=ACT]Marmol won’t get much of anything back, I’m afraid. He’s quite expensive, and his control issues that prevent him from being an elite reliever. I don’t think 1 year of Byrd is worth much, either.[/quote]While Marmol’s value definitely dropped, it seems like the market for relievers, elite or otherwise, is seriously overinflated. I don’t know how many buyers remain, but I would expect a Marmol trade to bring back more than the Cubs would lose.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    43. 43 Snyds01 says:

      ranked by trade value in regards to return
      Realistic Candidates

      Garza
      Marshall
      Soto
      Marmol
      Byrd
      Wells
      Baker
      LaHair
      Dewitt
      Samarzidjahikla
      Soriano
      Z

      how close is this?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    44. 44 ZappBrannigan says:

      This team is going to be awful. Without the Astros, they could easily finish last in the division.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    45. 45 mb21 says:

      [quote name=AndCounting]Thoughts of the batting order genuinely made me laugh.[/quote](dying laughing) I didn’t even want to contemplate the batting order.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    46. 46 mb21 says:

      [quote name=dylanj]1. DeJesus
      2. Barney ?
      3. Castro
      4. LaHair
      5. Soto
      6. Byrd
      7. Soriano
      8. Stewart?

      pretty rough stuff[/quote]Starting pitchers won’t get any sleep the night before they face this lineup.

      If I had to guess the lineup, I’d go Barney, DeJesus, Castro, Soto, LaHair, Byrd, Soriano and Stewart

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    47. 47 AB says:

      [quote name=mb21](dying laughing) I didn’t even want to contemplate the batting order.[/quote]
      you got a nice little tip of the hat in the fangraphs write up about ReJo.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    48. 48 mb21 says:

      [quote name=ACT]Marmol won’t get much of anything back, I’m afraid. He’s quite expensive, and his control issues that prevent him from being an elite reliever. I don’t think 1 year of Byrd is worth much, either.[/quote]Yeah, exactly, Marmol’s due almost $17 million over the next 2 years. That’s probably a bit more than he’s worth. If some team thinks they can turn him into a 3-WAR pitcher then maybe there’s something in return, but not as he is. Wouldn’t even surprise me if the Cubs had to throw in some money to get rid of him.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    49. 49 ACT says:

      [quote name=mb21]Starting pitchers won’t get any sleep the night before they face this lineup.

      If I had to guess the lineup, I’d go Barney, DeJesus, Castro, Soto, LaHair, Byrd, Soriano and Stewart[/quote]From what I’ve heard, I think DeJesus is penciled in in the leadoff position. I suspect that Castro is 2nd.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    50. 50 ACT says:

      I would personally prefer to platoon Johnson and DeJesus. I’d probably try to platoon at 2nd and 3rd as well.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    51. 51 dylanj says:

      barney & stewart are the biggest black holes I see there. Would really really love to get a real 2B back if we trade Garza. Not sure who has many cant miss 2B prospects though

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    52. 52 ZappBrannigan says:

      [quote name=mb21]Starting pitchers won’t get any sleep the night before they face this lineup.
      [/quote]
      So the Cubs are going for the insomnia via chronic laughter approach?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    53. 53 ACT says:

      Bright side: I don’t know if the Cubs’ hitters can be any worse than the Giants or Mariners last year.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    54. 54 mb21 says:

      [quote name=Snyds01]ranked by trade value in regards to return
      Realistic Candidates

      Garza
      Marshall
      Soto
      Marmol
      Byrd
      Wells
      Baker
      LaHair
      Dewitt
      Samarzidjahikla
      Soriano
      Z

      how close is this?[/quote]I’d go with something like this:

      Garza
      Marshall
      Soto
      Byrd

      Maybe you could get something decent if you kicked in some money for Marmol and Dempster.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    55. 55 Snyds01 says:

      [quote name=mb21]I’d go with something like this:

      Garza
      Marshall
      Soto
      Byrd

      Maybe you could get something decent if you kicked in some money for Marmol and Dempster.[/quote]
      Im not even thinking decent, I was just looking at who brings back the most…I am fully aware that the likes of Shark, DeWitt etc, are not going to bring back even a prospect…but what they bring back is better than the guy below them, whatever it is.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    56. 56 Snyds01 says:

      [quote name=mb21]I’d go with something like this:

      Garza
      Marshall
      Soto
      Byrd

      Maybe you could get something decent if you kicked in some money for Marmol and Dempster.[/quote]

      and I agree on Dempster, but I dont think he agrees to be traded, so no reason to include him.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    57. 57 theantigoat says:

      Man, been a long time since I visited a cubs blog. Hows it goin guys?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    58. 58 WaLi says:

      Packers America’s favorite team, Cowboys most disliked

      http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/2011/PPP_Release_National_1221513.pdf

      What I got out of it:

      Women are Not Sure
      Republicans/Conservatives love Tebow
      African-Americans love Vick
      Hispanics hate the Cowboys

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    59. 59 Rice Cube says:

      [quote name=Suburban kid]Finally got you a Christmas present, RC.

      http://www.banterist.com/archivefiles/000305.html/quoteI love those perky dots.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    60. 60 Dr. Aneus Taint says:

      [quote name=WaLi]HIspanics hate the Cowboys[/quote]
      If you mean Mexicans, you couldn’t me more wrong. They LOVE the Cowboys.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    61. 61 WaLi says:

      [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]If you mean Mexicans, you couldn’t me more wrong. They LOVE the Cowboys.[/quote]False. According to the PPP of the 8% hispanics out of 700 total people polled, 51% of them are “unfavorable” to the Cowbows and only 16% are favorable. This is only off +/- 3%.

      Stats don’t lie, your eye test has failed you! They must just be trying to blend in, but when voting secretly the truth comes out.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    62. 62 Dr. Aneus Taint says:

      [quote name=WaLi]False. According to the PPP of the 8% hispanics out of 700 total people polled, 51% of them are “unfavorable” to the Cowbows and only 16% are favorable. This is only off +/- 3%.

      Stats don’t lie, your eye test has failed you! They must just be trying to blend in, but when voting secretly the truth comes out.[/quote]
      Trust me. All the Mexicans in the world live in Texas, and they all wear Cowboys merchandise.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    63. 63 Rice Cube says:

      Since this is a baseball blog.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    64. 64 WenningtonsGorillaCock says:

      [quote name=Rice Cube]

      Since this is a baseball blog.[/quote]
      It is?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    65. 65 Rice Cube says:

      [quote name=WenningtonsGorillaCock]It is?[/quote]Unless it is a misting station.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    66. 66 Aisle424 says:

      [quote name=Rice Cube]Unless it is a misting station.[/quote]Is that like a misting station?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    67. 67 Aisle424 says:

      [quote name=theantigoat]Man, been a long time since I visited a cubs blog. Hows it goin guys?[/quote]
      This is the year!!!

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    68. 68 Aisle424 says:

      [quote name=mb21](dying laughing) I didn’t even want to contemplate the batting order.[/quote]
      In a bold new strategy, the entire Cubs lineup will bat 7th.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    69. 69 mb21 says:

      [quote name=Aisle424]In a bold new strategy, the entire Cubs lineup will bat 7th.[/quote](dying laughing)

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    70. 70 WenningtonsGorillaCock says:

      Gio Gonzales ——> Natinals

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    71. 71 Rice Cube says:

      [quote name=WenningtonsGorillaCock]Gio Gonzales ——> Natinals[/quote]Ooooh, what’d the A’s get?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    72. 72 Rice Cube says:

      [quote name=Rice Cube]Ooooh, what’d the A’s get?[/quote]http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2011/12/nationals-to-acquire-gio-gonzalez.html

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    73. 73 Berselius says:

      [quote name=mb21]Starting pitchers won’t get any sleep the night before they face this lineup.

      If I had to guess the lineup, I’d go Barney, DeJesus, Castro, Soto, LaHair, Byrd, Soriano and Martha Stewart[/quote]
      How I read this.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    74. 74 GBTS says:

      Martha Stewart would bat at least sixth in this lineup.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    75. 75 GW says:

      GW ———> Ph.D.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    76. 76 Berselius says:

      [quote name=GW]GW ———> Ph.D.[/quote]

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    77. 77 WenningtonsGorillaCock says:

      [quote name=GW]GW ———> Ph.D.[/quote]

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    78. 78 Rodrigo says:

      If the Cubs are really rebuilding why not trade B. Jackson and the like for quantity. Numerous prospects to restock the system.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    79. 79 Rice Cube says:

      [quote name=GW]GW ———> Ph.D.[/quote]Congratulations! Got a postdoc lined up?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    80. 80 WenningtonsGorillaCock says:

      Prince ——> Mariners

      (per Richard Roeper’s twitter (dying laughing))

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    81. 81 GW says:

      [quote name=Rice Cube]Congratulations! Got a postdoc lined up?[/quote]
      thanks! not yet. i’m going to try for an industry position first.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    82. 82 Rice Cube says:

      [quote name=GW]thanks! not yet. i’m going to try for an industry position first.[/quote]I think you might have chosen wisely. I’m a bit jaded by academia though (dying laughing) Good luck.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    83. 83 ACT says:

      [quote name=WenningtonsGorillaCock]Prince ——> Mariners

      (per Richard Roeper’s twitter (dying laughing))[/quote]Projected triple crown line: .300, 35 HR, 60 RBI

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    84. 84 2883 says:

      [quote name=GW]GW ———> Ph.D.[/quote]
      2883 ———–> ABD…

      Hopefully will finish… Hopefully…

      Congrats though. I’m looking Industry too although if I really like teaching, I may go academia.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    85. 85 PFD says:

      Haven’t been around here in a while, but I just checked out this post…. HOLY SHIT is this team gonna blow. I honestly could see us finishing behind the Astros.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    86. 86 mb21 says:

      [quote name=GW]thanks! not yet. i’m going to try for an industry position first.[/quote]Obstructed View is still trying to hire my replacement. I can put in a good word for you.

      Congrats!

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    87. 87 Suburban kid says:

      What is it with this motherfucking website and Ph.Ds?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    88. 88 Suburban kid says:

      Also, what is it with the last couple of days bringing back about five old ACB posters?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    89. 89 GW says:

      [quote name=mb21]Obstructed View is still trying to hire my replacement. I can put in a good word for you.

      Congrats![/quote]
      Not sure if I meet the qualifications.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    90. 90 mb21 says:

      [quote name=Suburban kid]What is it with this motherfucking website and Ph.Ds?[/quote]I don’t know. Intelligent people bring other intelligent people to discuss shit? That doesn’t explain how it got started since Adam, Tim and myself are dumber than shit.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    91. 91 mb21 says:

      [quote name=GW]Not sure if I meet the qualifications.[/quote]You can always fib on the application.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    92. 92 Rice Cube says:

      [quote name=mb21]I don’t know. Intelligent people bring other intelligent people to discuss shit? That doesn’t explain how it got started since Adam, Tim and myself are dumber than shit.[/quote]We’ll credit it all to Berselius then.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Leave a Reply

    RSS Obstructed View Forum