Marlon Byrd traded to Red Sox for Michael Bowden

In News And Rumors, Transactions by dmick89152 Comments

probable that the Cubs will trade Marlon Byrd to the Red Sox. It's likely the Cubs pick up the bulk of Byrd's remaining contract ($6 millionish) to increase the package they get in return. It's unlikely the Cubs will acquire much talent in this trade. A decet relief pitching prospect is probably about as good as it will get.

More on this as it develops.

1:34pm: Red Sox manager Bobby Valentine acknowledged to reporters that the club’s talks with the Cubs are advanced, writes Scott Lauber of the Boston Herald. “The talks have been good talks, from what I gather,” Valentine said. “Ben [Cherington] will try to get as good a player as he can get.” — MLBTR

Byrd states that he has been traded according to Bruce Levine:

It's also done according to Sean McAdam of CSNNE.com

Share this Post

Comments

  1. josh

    These games feel even better after the long losing streaks. It’s the slow buildup that makes it good.

    I was going to do a comic where the Hope Monster is dying, but this win will definitely give him some fuel to come back to life. MAYBE JOE MATHER WILL SAVE US!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. ACT

    Berselius wrote:

    It would basically turn baseball into football. You’d have a different package of guys out there for each PA/play

    More than that. You’d just have 1 hitter acting like a DH for every defensive player. Unlimited substitutions invalidate the whole concept of a lineup.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. Mercurial Outfielder

    @ Berselius:
    We’ve lost discipline in the midfield and across the back. Totally disorganized. Modric and Bale have vanished, due to selfish, positionally inept play from both. They’re both trying to be the star of the show and are only succeeding in removing themselves from play.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. GW

    @ Mercurial Outfielder:

    that’s how i felt wrt campana’s d after watching him on tv last year. he looked good in person, though. covered a ton of ground, backed up jax on occasion, threw out one guy at the plate and just missed a second.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. Rice Cube

    @ mb21:
    I was wondering that. I hypothesized that they were waiting for more data to come in before putting in the numbers? But I thought you could calculate WAR as long as someone had playing time.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. mb21

    1:34pm: Red Sox manager Bobby Valentine acknowledged to reporters that the club’s talks with the Cubs are advanced, writes Scott Lauber of the Boston Herald. “The talks have been good talks, from what I gather,” Valentine said. “Ben [Cherington] will try to get as good a player as he can get.” — MLBTR

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    So apparently the Repko dude BOS called up also separated his shoulder yesterday.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    I’m starting to think that a Clevenger-Castillo platoon could manage league avg production at C.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    <blockquote Source: Byrd deal remains probable. Timing issues remain. #Cubs likely to pay most of Byrd's remaining $6.5M. Bowden in play from #RedSox.

    ken rosenthal. i’d say bowden is interesting for the bullpen

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. Pezcore

    I hope this means we bring up B-Jax. I’m holding out hope that my larger sawx trade (Barney, Soto, and Byrd for Wil Middlebrooks and Anthony Raunado) somehow happens. I’d rather have one B prospect close to the majors for all three than three C+ prospects for each one.

    I’m hoping we somehow snag Raunado. He was top 4 sawx prospects a year ago, but slipped due to injuries. Starter in low teens according to sickels. ++ Upside and not that far away.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. Berselius

    (dying laughing), I thought Humber was still in the Mets org somewhere. No wonder all the other blogs continuously blast this one for being complete shit

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. ACT

    I love how Weaver, Shields, Verlander, Halladay, Strasburg and Kershaw are pitching today, and Philip Humber is the one who gets the perfect game.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. Rice Cube

    @ Rice Cube:
    Fortune favors the bold, I guess. Could’ve been a bases-clearer if that’d been hit a bit further away. Too bad they couldn’t get the final out though (dying laughing)

    IBB —> the devil

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. mb21

    That looked like a check swing to me, but that just makes it equal to all the other perfect games since a call or three always goes the pitcher’s way.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. mb21

    There’s a question on The Book Blog: who would you rather have for this season, Strasburg or Cliff Lee. About 3 in 4 have picked Lee. Are they fucking nuts? Lee makes $21.5 million this year. Strasburg $21 million less than that. Obviously you can’t really count on Strasburg for anything over 100 innings and Lee you can probably pencil in for 220. Strasburg is as good and maybe even better than Lee. Take the 100 innings from him for league minimum and spend the other $21 million on someone like Halladay. What the fuck?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. ACT

    @ mb21:
    You’re missing the point. It’s not about whom you’d pay for, it’s about which one you’d rather have. People are picking Lee because he’ll get more innings and therefore be more valuable (probably).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. mb21

    @ ACT:
    You’d obviously go with Lee if that’s the question. I assumed when Tango said for this year only it means that you also pay the contract since, well, it’s the only way you’d have the player. Cliff Lee comes with a $21.5 million price tag. Oh well. I misinterpreted the stupid question (it’s stupid either way).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. Rice Cube

    @ ACT:
    They are technically avian, but there were some feathered dinosaurs discovered in the fossil record. Plus the bone structure (i.e. the “keel” bone) was remarkably similar.

    /nerd

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. Rice Cube

    @ ACT:
    I think the phylogeny supports your statement but Dinosauria is a subclass of Reptilia whereas birds are in their own class (Aves) so it depends on which classification system you are talking about. Not that I’m a taxonomist, mind you.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. mb21

    @ Rice Cube:
    And Luke Scott.

    Here are some things people either believe in or don’t: Santa, Easter bunny, man in the sky, curses.

    Here’s a a few things that exist or existed: Mountain Dew, rainforests, monkeys, hot dogs, cinnamon rolls, dinosaurs, pillows, couches, teeth

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. Rice Cube

    Re: the earlier query I had about substitutions in baseball…what if you forced the manager to keep the player in the same spot in the lineup for the entire game? Would it work better then?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. ACT

    @ Rice Cube:
    That would get rid of the problem of one batter doing all the hitting, but it would still likely lead to the hitters and fielders being different men. I suppose you could argue whether that’s bad, since both defense and offense would likely improve, but it would be a very radical change, and most people like to watch players who can hit as well as field.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. mb21

    With the exception of the DH I’d like to see them field. I’ll admit I’m not as married to that idea as a lot of people are, but I’d still rather the 8 position players bat and the pitcher be replaced by someone who actually practices hitting.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. josh

    @ mb21:
    I almost wouldn’t mind seeing an O-team and a D-team. I’d be for about anything that made the game more exciting. Personally, I imagine baseball could be made to be an exciting sport. I imagine kind of an arena baseball that maybe has more in common with modern softball than baseball. Taking away some of the elements of chance, such as if the ball is hit, and allowing players to make skill shots, for instance, be reducing the emphasis on pitching, could be fun. Vague I know. It almost seems like to me MLB will never make drastic changes, not until their revenues really suffer. They aren’t going to change major things for fear of losing fans.

    I think the CBA will hurt baseball in the long-term for this reason. It’s a leveling move, which means luck becomes more important. Yay.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  25. Aisle424

    So what’s the deal with Bowden? Is he at least a halfway decent reliever who could make us never have to see Shawn Camp again?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  26. Pezcore

    I just hate Soto, that’s all. I really think Clevanger/Castillo will be better than what Soto has to offer. At this point, he is a backup catcher. Why not play splits?

    Soto’s weird, unrealistic every-other-year approach almost always means he will dissapoint, and every even year is worse than the last.

    Plus he’s latino, and Beef Castle/Steve Cleveage are not. And as a member of the general public, I have an unhealthy attitudes towards race.

    I’d like to see Adolfo gone b4 Soto however.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  27. Pezcore

    He’s domincan, but he’s the short half of the split, So Steve’s Clevage downgrades it. I saw the name and thought he was British.

    The brits too busy killing things and playing quidditch to be any good at rounders.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment