Daily Facepalm – 2.18.12, Evening Edition

In Facepalm, News And Rumors by Obstructed View Staff90 Comments

Obstructed View Daily Facepalm

Neverending Story

Remember when we were on the 5-yard line in the Theo compensation talks? Remember when Bud Selig said he'd get involved if a decision hadn't been agreed to by sometime in November? Remember when he said the same thing about December? January? Remember two weeks ago when were told Bud would have a decision by week's end? Rememer this week when we were told the same thing? To the surprise of exactly zero people this has been delayed yet again.

At this stage, the source says, the Sox are hopeful of acquiring one quality minor-league prospect from the Cubs. They’re resigned to not getting a major leaguer from the Cubs, and acknowledge it probably won’t be one of the Cubs’ premium prospects, like a Brett Jackson or Josh Vitters. But the source says the Sox are insisting on acquiring a prospect with a legitimate chance of making it to the big leagues as a contributor.

The Red Sox expect a decision in the coming week, the source said. — Gordon Edes

I think GW said it best recently when he said he was confident that the decision would be a player to be named later.

By the way, what prospect doesn't have a legitimate chance of making it to the big leagues as a contributor? If Ryan Theriot and Darwin Barney can do it then so can anyone else. If all they want is that give them the lowest ranked prospect in the organization. Someone like Hayden Simpson who was accidentally chosen in the first round of the draft by the Cubs.

The Cubs' Way

The Cubs' Way is now a manual. This is my favorite quote:

You can't figure this thing out. — Theo Epstein

Recently DFA'd

Blake DeWitt still has a chance to compete for the 2nd base job if he decides to return to the organization. He'd just add one more mediocre 2nd basemen to the mix.

Things That Will Be A Distraction

Theo doesn't think the Starlin Castro rape allegations will be a distraction.

MESA, Ariz. — Starlin Castro should be at camp when position players are scheduled to report on Thursday, and the offseason allegations surrounding him are not expected to be a distraction, said president of baseball operations Theo Epstein.

Let's remember that the Cubs sportwriters didn't overreact to someone chatting with his friends and family on a computer. They didn't overreact to a pitcher taking batting practice and they didn't overreact to a pitcher hanging out in a park. The media will make whatever the hell they want a distraction. Thankfully for Castro he isn't alleged to have done any of the above. So Theo may be right.

A Recent Performance I Enjoyed

Share this Post

Comments

  1. Author
    Rice Cube

    Q: DeWitt was DFA’ed, and if released he gets $200K or so. How much does he get if outrighted or if he miraculously makes the roster? Does he get the full contract he got in arbitration or do they negotiate a new deal?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    I fully expect Castro to get the Full Bradley during ST, complete with the article where Sullivan asks him the same question 5 times and then accuses Castro of refusing to let it go.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. Berselius

    @ Rice Cube:

    I think he still has the same deal. When players are DFA’d and released, if they sign a new contract with another team the old team is still responsible for the money owed.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. Author
    Rice Cube

    @ Berselius:
    That’s what I originally thought, but the DFA took place before spring training and MLBTR suggested the Cubs only owed a sixth of the contract so now I’m confused (dying laughing)

    Thanks.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. Berselius

    Rice Cube wrote:

    That’s what I originally thought, but the DFA took place before spring training and MLBTR suggested the Cubs only owed a sixth of the contract so now I’m confused (dying laughing)

    Thanks.

    Good point. Maybe what I said only applies to FAs.

    I still think the Cubs owe him the full amount, I think the 1/6 thing would only be if he was released.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. Author
    josh

    Theo doesn’t think the Starlin Castro rape allegations will not be a distraction.

    Are you unsure that’s not what he doesn’t think? Or sure that it isn’t not what he does think? Or the opposite of that?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. Author
    WaLi

    @ mb21:

    Yeah, the lyrics, the music, the multiple parts.. it’s a beautfiul song. Recently I was lucky enough to enjoy Phil & Friends playing this. One of my most memorable and favorite moments of listening to live music.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. Smokestack Lightning

    @ Rice Cube:

    It’s hard to argue with those who say it’s going to take more than 5 years before the Cubs are competitive again, but there’s part of me that can’t help but feel that, given the Cubs’ vast resources, if it takes the Superfriends more than 2 years to get this organization back in the running, they should be utterly destroyed.

    And if the plan is to contend in the next three years, probably gonna need Garza to do it.

    But as you say, it’s just talk right now.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. Author
    mb21

    @ WaLi:
    I haven’t seen Phil and Friends play. Actually, I haven’t seen any of them since I saw Ratdog in Tempe about a decade ago. I’m going to see Furthur sometime this fall and I’m excited.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. Author
    josh

    It may be that they don’t contend in the next five years, but Garza will still be good in 3 years or so that it’s worth signing on the off chance that they catch a few lucky breaks, or some good free agents end up coming their way. We’ll know more about the effects of the new CBA next season, so maybe after that a contention plan with a shorter timeframe will be more realistic.

    Plus, just the fact that they need to still try to win a few games seems like a good enough reason to sign Garza on for a few years.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    Not to mention that if they sign Garza to a team-friendly deal, he becomes a more attractive trade piece.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. Berselius

    I don’t see how these comments from Hoyer are any different from what he’s said the whole time he’s been here, re Garza. He’s always said they could maybe consider thinking about having general discussions about an extension or something in the nearish future.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. Author
    mb21

    @ josh:
    Yeah, there are solid argument for why signing him makes sense. I don’t particularly care one way or the other. I wish they had traded him this offseason, but I don’t want the Cubs to trade him just to trade him.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. fang2415

    Wojciechowski:

    I was going to ask Epstein whom he’d want playing him in a movie, should the Cubs make good on his 2012 World Series goal.

    Except that Epstein hasn’t seen “Moneyball.” And doesn’t plan to either.

    “It’s baseball time, not movie time,” he said curtly.

    (dying laughing)
    (dying laughing)

    Especially after Woj spent 4 paragraphs using a movie analogy to talk about how great it is that that evil man Zambrano is finally gone. Theo finding new ways to tell reporters to shut up may now be what I’m looking forward to most about the season. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. Berselius

    What happened to Joel Pineiro? He ended up having to sign a $1.5m minor league deal with Philly. I’m surprised Thoyer didn’t snatch him up if that was the market.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. Author
    josh

    @ mb21:
    Exactly, if they can’t get a return on him, then hold him and try to get a team-friendly contract that ups his trade value in the future, if the team takes the expected mediocre route.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. Author
    mb21

    @ josh:
    His trade value is probably never going to be higher than it is now. Over the next two years he’s being paid roughly 70% of his free agent value. I calculated him being worth roughly $65-70 million over 5 years including the 70% free agent value for the first 2 years. The Cubs would have to instead get him to sign for 5 years and no more than $50 million and he still has the same trade value he has now. Based on what Danks received this offseason I can’t imagine Garza signing for that much less.

    Then you factor in the risk. By the 3rd year he’s going to be declining, if not sooner. He’ll have more innings and more chances to get injured. off the top of my head I’d put it at 5 years and $40 million to make it worth the Cubs risk IF they’re trying to keep his trade value up. There’s no way he’s going to sign that contract. And even if he does, he’s a pitcher and has a good chance of being injured at some point in the next year or two. Garza is also due for some regression in 2012.

    A general rule of thumb is this: a player’s trade value is never higher than it is today. This is true for almost all players. There are exceptions. Injured players who sign ridiculously low contracts can prove they’re healthy and have a higher trade value down the road. Players who were ineffective one year can do the same. A player who just had the best season of his career probably has lower trade value with each passing day because that regression will begin soon. The risk of injury piles up with each additional pitch.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. fang2415

    Hey, just to quickly re-hijack yesterday’s IPA thread hijack:

    Haven’t some of you people tried homebrewing and more or less liked it? Is http://www.homebrewtalk.com/ the best resource for info on that or is there a better site? Has anybody tried making wine at home? Is that worthwhile, or is it not worth bothering unless you’re growing fields of your own grapes (dying laughing)?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. Author
    Suburban kid

    This makes absolutely no sense, but I wish those Caribeann leagues were going on now. In December and January, my reaction to them is ‘meh”. Now that it is late February, I am really jonesing for a game to watch.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    @ fang2415:

    I love brewing, and HBT is the best forum I’ve found. The community there is very helpful and patient.

    I know nothing about home winemaking, except that every time I’ve had homemade wine, the party turns into a near Lord of the Flies situation. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. fang2415

    @ Mercurial Outfielder:
    The party becomes dominated by the conflicting impulses toward civilization and towards the will to power? (dying laughing)

    Cool though, thanks for the info. I just noticed that a shop at the end of the road sells whole homebrew rigs for around £30; I’ve been thinking of trying homebrew beer but my sister is a wine drinker so we may give that a whirl first. Sounds like somebody at HBT could probably at least point us in the right direction for wine advice if necessary…

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. Author
    Mercurial Outfielder

    @ fang2415:

    Probably so. If I had to recommend a kit, I’d start with the Northern Brewer setup, and get two Better Bottles, don’t bother with glass carboys.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. fang2415

    @ Mercurial Outfielder:
    We may not have that level of choice/budget for now; also, I’m guessing that it’d be a pain to get Northern Brewer stuff in the UK.

    Do you use carboys in the beer process or are they just for wine? Is the main issue with the glass that it’s hard to clean/sanitize? The Better Bottles do look good, but I think we may have to go the cheap and stupid route to start out and then upgrade later…

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. mambochicken

    fang, I’ve been brewing for the last three years or so and I have done a few batches of mead (honey wine) as well. If you’re set up to brew, you’re set up to make wine (fruit wine, mead) or cider or whatever the hell else you’d like to make that doesn’t require hot distillation. The HBT forums are really helpful.

    Get a decent startup kit if you think that there’s a good chance you will enjoy the hobby. I love it, personally. Don’t buy the cheapest stuff and then realize that you want better equipment down the line and have to replace it. Better bottles are fine, though I use glass carboys. Invest in an auto-siphon.

    Welcome to the addiction.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  25. fang2415

    @ mambochicken:
    Thanks. I do see a lot of advice to invest in good equipment, but from the looks of it a nice thing about winemaking is that it really only requires a carboy/big bottle, a few tubes and corks, and a hydrometer. That would be ideal as our budgetary and space constraints are pretty severe at the moment; if we try out a minimal setup first then we can be smarter about how to use our limited resources to smooth out any bottlenecks in our process.

    Welcome to the addiction.

    OV is now my favorite site for advice on both breaking addiction to alcohol consumption and creating addiction to alcohol production. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  26. Author
    josh

    @ mb21:
    All true, but occasionally market forces may drive up a player’s value beyond its true worth.

    He may simply be worth more as a starting pitcher than what he’ll bring back in trade over the next three years. The Cubs still have to field a team. There’s still revenue to generate, if they’re going to have any payroll at all. It’s easy for us to say this season is a wash before it starts, but I don’t think a GM has that luxury. I guess my point is just keep him and maybe things come together, or maybe an opportunity arises that drives up his value artificially. If not, then we have a solid pitcher on the team to help the Cubs win a few games.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  27. Author
    GBTS

    @ Berselius:
    I’ll always remember that 4 homer game he had against the White Sox. Him and Boone went back-to-back in the first inning, twice. (dying laughing)

    Holy shit, he had all four by the fifth inning.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  28. fang2415

    (dying laughing), now turns out that my sister knew somebody who made lousy homemade wine in the 80s and may veto the whole thing. Have things improved enough since then to convince her that even idiots can make drinkable stuff nowadays?

    The 80s ruin everything. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  29. Author
    Rice Cube

    Non-baseball thoughts:

    1. Jeremy Lin is good but needs to stop turning the ball over so damned much. Plus play defense.

    2. The Miami Heat are fun to watch.

    Carry on.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  30. mambochicken

    @ fang2415:

    My first wine was an orange blossom show mead. It is not that good. It’s drinkable, but it kind of smells like a felt tip marker. I will probably use most of the rest to cook with.

    However, my last couple of batches of wine have come out really good. Another aspect of winemaking, at least with meads, is that they take a lot of time. Not a ton of work, but a lot of time. My last two batches are good now, but I project that they are both going to be outstanding with some time in the bottle.

    For the record, I have never made wine with grapes/grape juice. I have a knowledgable oenophile/homebrewer friend who insists that while homebrewers can produce world-class beer with regularity, home winemakers using grapes generally fall well short of commercial quality wine. If I were you and didn’t have strong preferences towards grape wine, I would tell you to make cider or mead.

    You can always add additional fruit or spices to liven up a mead or get different flavor profiles. I made a 20% abv sack mead with caramelized honey, bourbon-soaked oak chips, and vanilla beans that resembles a tawny port in many ways. I also recently bottled a mead made with wildflower honey and fresh cranberry juice that people have mistaken for a typical blush wine. Even the kinda-crappy orange blossom mead was mistaken for a pinot grigio.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  31. mambochicken

    @fang,

    Oh, and if you want to get others on board with fermentation science and your new hobby, I really would start with beer. You can have delicious, well-crafted, ready-to-drink beer in about three weeks. Give people a few bottles of your early batches of standard brews (e.g., pale ale, hefe, mild, bitter, brown), and then move to more time-intensive and somewhat more difficult fermentation projects (imperial stouts, barleywines, wines, etc). My girlfriend was totally up for me starting to make meads after she had a few of my more impressive homebrews.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  32. Author
    mb21

    @ josh:
    I don’t mind if the Cubs keep Garza. He’s worth the money. I’d just have preferred they trade him. He’ll be an old man by the time the Cubs are contending, but he’s going to provide value while here. I do not want the Cubs to sign him to an extension though. If they want to keep him for two years and then get a draft pick, fine. If they want to trade him next offseason, great. Signing pitchers long-term is rarely a good idea.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  33. Author
    mb21

    What is Theo’s issue with Moneyball (the book)? Does he really think that information would have remained with 1 or 2 teams? With all of the new types of analysis over the last decade we’ve seen that every team uses it. It’s ridiculous to think that information in the book would have remained with 1 or 2 teams. Was it even only 1 or 2 teams anyway? I’m guessing it was closer to 5 or 6. As many executives who move from team to team that information was going to reach 30 teams within a calendar year anyway.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  34. fang2415

    @ mambochicken:
    Hmm, thanks for the advice. I’d actually prefer to do beer, but unfortunately my sister (and landlord, and thus arbiter of what’s allowed in the kitchen) is a wine nazi who’s had like three beers in her life and doesn’t want any more.

    It looks like the best way to make grape wines may actually be from kits; I’m thinking something like this might be a good way to start. The word “Barolo” may also have been persuasive… If we can get something that’s at least of medium supermarket-quality, then hopefully that’ll buy me enough credibility that we can expand into the rest of the kitchen, (dying laughing). Luckily, it seems like this stuff may be a lot cheaper over here — 6 bottles of Barolo for £12 is hard to argue with…

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  35. Berselius

    mb21 wrote:

    McNutt is fucked because you’ve got a bunch of AAAA guys in AAA this year.

    If he’s ready to make the jump, none of those guys are going to hold him back. He probably needs more time to get his groove back anyway, and he can do that just as easily in AA.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  36. Aisle424

    mb21 wrote:

    What is Theo’s issue with Moneyball (the book)? Does he really think that information would have remained with 1 or 2 teams? With all of the new types of analysis over the last decade we’ve seen that every team uses it. It’s ridiculous to think that information in the book would have remained with 1 or 2 teams. Was it even only 1 or 2 teams anyway? I’m guessing it was closer to 5 or 6. As many executives who move from team to team that information was going to reach 30 teams within a calendar year anyway.

    I think it sped up the process. I haven’t seen him say anything disparaging about it, but I haven’t been paying that close attention. What I’ve seen is that he said he didn’t read it (which isn’t completely outrageous, since I doubt leading economists read the pop-economics-for-dummies books that exist for the sole purpose of making people feel smart) and that he didn’t see the movie.

    Did he read Joe Morgan’s Baseball for Dummies? Did he read Canseco’s book about steroids? I’d bet not.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  37. Aisle424

    Rice Cube wrote:

    They’re fun to watch. They’re just not very likable (dying laughing)

    Generally, I don’t get the compulsion to punch the shit out of people that are fun to watch.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  38. Author
    mb21

    @ Aisle424:
    I don’t think any of them should read or see it unless they want to. That doesn’t matter to me. My guess is that most current GMs wouldn’t like the movie and would only like the book slightly better. It’s a simplified version of their job and people tend to not appreciate it when someone simplifies their work. It’s no surprise Tony LaRussa doesn’t like it. I think if managers and GMs were being honest and not afraid of backlash at least 29 of them would despise it. But I think it’s naive to think that 1) only 1 or 2 teams had that knowledge and 2) the book is responsible for sharing that knowledge. The truth is that there’s not really anything groundbreaking in Moneyball. Teams had been exploiting the market inefficiencies for decades. Branch Rickey sough to acquire the undervalued African Americans. Prior to that teams began building elaborate farm systems to develop cheap, young talent. Teams began heavily scouting Latin America. They’ve done the same in Asia and other parts of the world too.

    Hell, even the Cubs were the first organization to use a computer to analyze statistics. It’s too bad the same computer sat at Wrigley Field all these years, but the Cubs, at that time, made an effort to take advantage of something other teams weren’t.

    I’m fine with Theo not liking it or not reading it. I get that, but I don’t accept his explanation as anything other than nonsense.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  39. Berselius

    mb21 wrote:

    My guess is that most current GMs wouldn’t like the movie and would only like the book slightly better. It’s a simplified version of their job and people tend to not appreciate it when someone simplifies their work.

    Yeah, I think this is the big part of it. Keith Law has also been a vocal critic because he felt it made way too much hay over the scouts/stats divide. He also had issues with the reporting, since a quote was misattributed to/from him.

    I think the point is more that the inefficiencies that the A’s were exploiting were relatively new ground, though like most things in the book the gap between the A’s and other orgs was much smaller than implied.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  40. Author
    mb21

    Berselius wrote:

    I think the point is more that the inefficiencies that the A’s were exploiting were relatively new ground, though like most things in the book the gap between the A’s and other orgs was much smaller than implied.

    I agree with this, but what can you exploit that isn’t relatively new ground? I’m sure Yankees historians could probably talk for hours how they’ve be exploiting these inefficiencies for a century. This is why I’ve always felt those who thought there were no more market inefficiencies just didn’t get it. These have existed since baseball began and they still do. The teams that do the best over a long period of time will be those with more progressive front offices (like the Cubs hopefully). Just look at what Beane has done since Moneyball. He went from undervalued OBP players to defense to undervalued SLG players. And probably more that none of us noticed.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  41. Berselius

    I guess new ground was the wrong term, but I think we’re arguing while agreeing here (dying laughing). Anyone expoliting inefficiencies is ahead of the curve by definition. What made Oakland more interesting than writing about the Yankees is the difference in payrolls.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  42. Author
    mb21

    @ Berselius:
    (dying laughing) yeah, that’s what we were doing. I agree, the A’s made a better story, though it’s interesting that team they covered was pretty damn good even with the guys they lost.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  43. Author
    GBTS

    @ Aisle424:
    I swear, every time Wade and LeBron hook up for an alley-oop, they give each other this seductive look like they’re totally going to hump in the locker room.

    I’m not even trying to be funny. Watch their highlights from tonight.

    Not that there’s anything wrong with that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  44. Author
    GBTS

    What if it were revealed that LeBron and Wade were actually gay lovers together in Miami? Would that be the biggest sports story in history? Given America’s attitude towards both LeBron and homosexuals, I think it would. It might even end sports history again.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  45. Aisle424

    GBTS wrote:

    What if it were revealed that LeBron and Wade were actually gay lovers together in Miami? Would that be the biggest sports story in history? Given America’s attitude towards both LeBron and homosexuals, I think it would. It might even end sports history again.

    That would be dwarfed by Lebron, Wade and Bosh three-waying it regularly.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  46. Author
    Rice Cube

    @ 8volumesthick:
    At some point about a month or so ago Eric Wedge had thought about moving Ichiro down in the order, which I thought was probably okay because Ichiro wasn’t getting on base enough to continue hitting leadoff (though last year could’ve been a fluke). But putting Figgins there seems like a fire-able offense to me. Maybe they know something we don’t know. Or maybe they really want the #1 pick in next year’s draft.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  47. Author
    Suburban kid

    My dad who is in his 70s told me the other day that he’s in the best shape of his life.

    The best shape of my life was probably around age 12 (dying laughing). I finally made it to the A league in Little League that year, but didn’t quite live up to my spring training potential.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  48. Author
    Suburban kid

    You can also see what appears to be some of the construction workers, either on a break, or more likely eating lunch, given that the scoreboard clock reads 12:10 (this photo was taken Friday, February 17).

    Alvin’s a regular Clark Kent.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment