New Cub Jake Brigham

In Commentary And Analysis, News And Rumors by dmick8932 Comments

Last night Geovany Soto was traded to the Texas Rangers for Jake Brigham. Brigham is a 24 year old right handed pitcher who has spent each of 2011 and 2012 for AA Frisco. His ERA over 2 seasons has basically been 4.5 and his FIP not much better. His FIP sits at 4.58 this year, his second time through the league. 

Brigham was drafted in the 6th round by the Rangers and thanks to Baseball America's draft database, here's what they had to say at the time of the draft. 

Few players in the high school class took a bigger step back from last fall to this spring than Brigham. He has shown a feel for pitching, a pair of potential plus pitches in his fastball and breaking ball and a fluid, easy delivery in the past. His delivery looked more mechanical this spring, and his control and velocity suffered. At his best, Brigham features a low-90s fastball, which has been up to 94 mph, and a hard-biting 82 mph slider. His arm works well from a high three-quarters slot that allows him to pitch downhill. He has shown good command and a feel for pitching, though he isn't as aggressive as he should be. Brigham played at a small high school, and some scouts said he played down to his poor competition. He regained his command and velocity later in the year, with only a handful of scouts at some of his starts. Based on his past performance, he could still be drafted in the top three rounds, and a good performance at the Florida high school all-star game in Seabring could rekindle interest right before the draft.

He signed early enough to made 14 appearances (11 starts) for the Texas AZL team. He threw 58.1 innings and as far as first impressions went, he probably drew some more attention than he had when the season began. He threw 58.1 innings and allowed 54 hits, but also struckout 8.9 and walked fewer than 3 batters per 9. Those aren't eye popping numbers, but the strikeout and walks per 9 are good enough for an 18 year old in the AZL. Better than good enough actually.

The following year in the Northwest League, another short-season league, he made 15 starts and the numbers weren't nearly what they were a year before. In 77 innings his walked jumped to 4 per 9 and his strikeouts dropped to 7.6. Although he had a pretty good 3.16 ERA, it was helped out by a 70% strand rate and his FIP was more than a run and a half higher.

He had Tommy John surgery sometime before the start of the 2008 season and missed the entire year. 

Returning to action in 2009 he threw 89.1 innings and allowed over 10 hits per 9. He did strikeout more than in 2007 and his walks declined, but neither number stood out. In 2010 his hits dropped, but his strikeouts did too. 

Looking at the numbers through this point in his career, I'm kind of surprised the Rangers didn't move him to the bullpen. It's unlikely his strikeout rate in the low minors is going to be anything other than ugly if he ever reached the big leagues and he wasn't a control artist so that too would likely get worse. He wasn't particularly difficult to hit either. I know he was still just 22 at this point, but he was two years removed from surgery, his numbers were trending the wrong direction and he was stuck in the low minors. 

I'm sure the Rangers argued that his performance in A ball was enough to give him another shot and maybe it was at the time. 

He hasn't been terrible in 2011 or 2012 at AA, but he hasn't been that impressive. At the age of 24 in AA, second time through, you'd expect some improvement and that hasn't happened. I won't be surprised to see this guy moved to the bullpen, but maybe the Cubs think they can turn him into a serviceable starter. It will be interesting to see where he reports.

Casey Coleman will reportedly be recalled to take Paul Maholm's spot on the roster so it's possible the Cubs bump him to AAA. I don't know what else he can do at AA at this point. His performance in AAA will determine whether or not he can be a fringe starter or a reliever. 

BBTIA profiled Jake Brigham in 2010. 

Baseball America wrote a bit about the trade and here's what they say about Brigham:

Brigham had tied for the Texas League lead with 116 strikeouts at the time of the trade, but he stood alone in first place with 19 home runs allowed thanks to a severe platoon split. Lefthanded batters get a good look at the ball because of Brigham's overhand arm slot, and they have batted .287/.369/.544 with 10 homers in 171 at-bats against him. He made up for that deficiency by fanning a quarter of the righthanded batters to oppose him with a solid fastball/curveball mix. Brigham topped out near 97 mph a couple years ago but sits more comfortably at 88-92 these days.

This is another reason why I think bullpen is where he ends up and where he ends up before too long. 

Evaluating this type of trade in the ways I have before (trade value) is rather difficult. Brigham was unranked by Sickels this year and at best a C prospect. He might have about $1.5 million in value in a trade, but it won't be more than that. Soto's in-season projections are way better than his performance. ZiPS projects a .314 wOBA and .7 WAR over 152 plate appearances. Over 5 plate appearances that's a little better than 2 WAR. 

Matt Swartz projected he'd be paid about $4.3 million next year, which is less than a win worth of money. So there's surplus trade value here. A total of .7 this year and perhaps as much as 2 next year for a total of about 2.7. He's owed about $5 million assuming the Rangers tender him a contract next year and received a player worth about $13.5 million until his contract expires at the end of next season. His surplus trade value was about $8 million and the Cubs acquired someone worth less than $2 million. Maybe less than $1 million.

Analyzing the deal like that makes it come out to a pretty poor deal for the Cubs and that's how I've been evaluating trades and should this one too. However, I think we can apply a little common sense here. First, it's hard to believe Soto is as good as his projection, but we can ignore that. Second, it's likely the Cubs would have non-tendered Soto this offseason if they hadn't traded him. As such, Soto would provide roughly .2 to .3 more WAR (using a lower projection of course) and that's worth about $1 million. They received about that in return. 

So this is a little more difficult. I'm willing to accept that this is a fair deal because I do think the Cubs would have non-tendered him and I do think the projections are overly optimistic though I do also expect Soto to be better than he has been. The Cubs come away with a guy who probably isn't going to remain a starter by the time he reaches the big leagues and could prove to be a useful arm in the bullpen. The value seems about right to me and that was my first impression last night. The Cubs gave up someone who isn't really that good and they were going to non-tender him anyway. They get a guy who really isn't any good and probably a reliever, but just might be of some value down the road. 

UPDATE: The Cubs also acquired a player to be named later or cash and they sent cash along in the deal. This is likely to offset itself so it won't matter much to any analysis. 

Share this Post

Comments

  1. mb21

    Yeah, I updated the post. PTBNL or cash and the Cubs send cash. As far as analysis of the trade goes, it will cancel itself out unless the PTBNL is someone awesome, which it won’t be.

    My guess is the Cubs send cash and if the Rangers keep him for next year they send a PTBNL. If they non-tender him they return the Cubs cash that they sent in the deal. Something like that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. TheVan

    GW wrote:

    I think soto could do very well for the rangers. anecdotally, offense in that park seems to heat up in august.

    I think that ballpark would be a good fit for Soto, too…if it wasn’t for that Napoli guy.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. GW

    @ TheVan:

    I think he’ll get his share of ab’s. michael young has been pretty awful, and it couldn’t hurt to give napoli less time behind the plate.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. mb21

    @ dylanj:

    While hardly a top prospect, the Cubs got a surprisingly solid arm in return for Soto. A sixth-round pick in 2006 out of a Florida high school, Brigham has been slow to develop in a career that includes a 2008 Tommy John surgery. Repeating Double-A this year, Brigham has better peripherals than his 4.28 ERA suggests, giving up less than a hit per inning with 116 strikeouts and 46 walks in 124 innings. He has a solid fastball that ranges from 91-95 mph, but he can get loose with the pitch up in the zone and gives up too many home runs as a result. His primary secondary pitch is a low-80s slider that rates as average, and while he has a changeup, it’s a below-average pitch. He projects as an innings-eating no. 4 or 5 starter or a solid middle reliever. He looks like a big leaguer, just not an impact one. —Kevin Goldstein

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. josh

    @ GW:
    They should have threatened to get rid of Michael Young. It worked last year.

    To paraphrase Flannery O’Connor: “[He] would of been a good [baseball player]…if it had been somebody there to [threaten to trade him] every minute of [his] life.”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. mb21

    It seems both KG and BA are assuming that Vizcaino is a reliever. Still a good deal for the Cubs all things considered, but not nearly as good as it could be if he was a starter.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. TheVan

    GW wrote:

    @ TheVan:
    I think he’ll get his share of ab’s. michael young has been pretty awful, and it couldn’t hurt to give napoli less time behind the plate.

    I just don’t see Geo getting more than 10 AB’s a week in that lineup. And that won’t help bounce back from a pretty weak start to the season.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. Suburban kid

    A scout troop consists of twelve little kids dressed like schmucks following a big schmuck dressed like a kid.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. mb21

    @ TheVan:
    FWIW, Soto’s rest of season numbers are expected to be better than what either catcher has done to this point in the season.

    So far this season, Torrealba has actually edged out Soto in terms of offense, with a TAv of .240 to .223. Soto’s PECOTA forecast, however, looks like an improvement over what either of them has done so far, while Torrealba’s rest-of-season projection looks like a spitting image of what he’s been doing all year. The Rangers are putting faith in the notion that Soto is a better player than he’s been so far this year, and even if he doesn’t recapture his impressive 2010 season, he should be an upgrade over what Torrealba is able to do. —Colin Wyers

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. Suburban kid

    Victorino —————————–> Dodgers

    Soriano ——————————-> nowhere?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. mb21

    @ bubblesdachimp:
    I would hope they’d give this guy a shot. It would be a damn shame if they didn’t. You just don’t find guys with his arm and the impressive numbers to back it up that often. You definitely don’t get them for Paul Maholm and Reed Johnson.

    We’re not going to see Vizcaino at the big league level until 2013 so there’s a long way to go before we get a look at the guy. He’ll probably begin pitching when spring training breaks next year and then be sent on rehab about the time the short-season leagues open. After 30 days he’ll be optioned to one of the higher minor leagues and spend the rest of the year and maybe a good part of the 2014 season too.

    By the way, that’s one reason why I like this deal more than Delgado. By the time the Cubs are contending Delgado would be making a lot of money. This guy won’t be.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. josh

    @ mb21:
    Is TJS even that big of a risk? Don’t most pitchers come back throwing just as well, if not better? I guess the risk is the chance that he reinjurs.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. Mucker

    What about Soriano to the Tigers? V Mart might not make it back and they are supposedly looking for a middle of the order hitter. 3-4-5 of Fielder, Cabrera and Soriano is pretty potent.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. josh

    @ mb21:
    The FO seems more biased toward post-TJS. Maybe the data is better for that particular surgery than for shoulders and whatever the hell it was Mark Prior had done (everything).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. bubblesdachimp

    @ mb21:

    I agree 100% and the fact that he is a top tier arm in the minors who has proven he can start. I think peopl;e just get scared by the size. But no one would dare say that Strasburg should be bullpenned cause he got TJS.

    I bet he starts and is really good in 2014

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. dylanj

    interesting to see the Cubs acquire a power arm pitcher with injury problems that some see as a RP some see as SP.

    Cashner is back (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment