Matt Garza Update

In News And Rumors by dmick89312 Comments

It’s been a few days since we had a post about Matt Garza and since we’re rebranding as the Matt Garza Blog we figured it was time for an update. Jon Heyman says that there is no leader in the trade talks.

There is “no real favorite” in the five-team Matt Garza sweepstakes, according to someone familiar with the talks.

The teams involved the derby for the 28-year-old Cubs righthander at this point are the Yankees, Blue Jays, Tigers, Red Sox and Marlins. With the Cubs seeking young pitchers, it would seem that the Yankees, Blue Jays and Tigers could hold an edge ultimately. The Yankees have Manny Banuelos and Dellin Betances, the Tigers Jacob Turner and the Blue Jays several well-regarded prospects at the lower levels. The Cubs are hoping to improve their young pitching stock, and Garza is the most marketable player they’re willing to deal.

Jacob-TurnerWith Jacob Turner available, I’m not sure this is really a tough decision on the Cubs part. Sure, they should try to get as much as possible, but a Turner for Garza straight up trade is more than beneficial to the Cubs. The Detroit News is suggesting it’s not just Turner in the deal.

The Tigers absolutely would be required to include more than Turner in any trade package for Garza. But it is believed multiple prospects, apart from Castellanos, are being offered as the Tigers talk with new Cubs general manager Theo Epstein.

Prior to the 2011 season, this is what Baseball America had to say about Turner (ranked 1 in the Tigers organization and 21st in baseball):

Scouting Report: Turner has the ideal frame for a power pitcher. He throws both two- and four-seam fastballs, sitting at 92-94 mph and peaking at 96. In addition to its easily above-average velocity, Turner’s fastball also has heavy sink. While Turner was polished for a prep pitcher, he was able to carve up high school lineups by simply blowing his heater by hitters, so entered pro ball with secondary pitches that needed refinement. He made strides with both his curveball and changeup in 2010. He throws a 12-6 curve that can get a little short but also shows glimpses of being an upper-70s hammer. His changeup should become at least a solid third pitch, with a chance to be better. Turner throws strikes but will need to sharpen his command within the strike zone as he climbs the ladder. Doing so shouldn’t be a problem because he’s a good athlete with a strong work ethic and relatively clean mechanics, though his delivery could use a little more fluidity. Turner shows terrific savvy and mound presence for his age, mixing his pitches well and rarely gets rattled. He has the swagger scouts want to see in a pitcher projected for the front of a major league rotation. He still has to add the strength to take the ball every fifth day and work deeper into games. He averaged fewer than five innings per start in 2010 and has never pitched in the 7th inning.

Turner earned a cup of coffee last season. I know some have been concerned about his strikeout rate (7.7 per 9), but keep in mind how young Turner is. He’s only 20 years old. He kind of reminds me of Madison Bumgarner. His K/9 in the minors was 8.0, but in the high minors in 2009 and 2010 it was about 6.1 per 9. He was also only 20 years old and the 14th ranked prospect in all of baseball. Bumgarner’s first full season in the big leagues was in 2011 at the age of 21. He struckout 8.4 per 9.

Bumgarner also had terrific control in the minors. He walked only 1.9 per 9 and it’s just over 2 in the big leagues so far. Like Bumgarner, Turner has had very good control, walking only 2.1 per 9 innings. I’m not at all concerned about Turner’s strikeout rate. As with all things minor leagues, age is the most important factor. If he was 24 years old I’d be concerned, but he can’t even legally drink yet.

If the Cubs acquired Turner he would be the top prospect in the Cubs organization. I’m very surprised the Tigers would consider trading him for Garza. If the Cubs really have the opportunity to acquire him they should.


Share this Post

Comments

  1. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    From previous:

    How much longer can ESPN employ Lee Corso? I used to think he was drunk during broadcasts, but now I’m starting to think he’s got Alzheimers or something. He can barely articulate anything. It’s sad more than anything. I know he’s annoying, but I can only see it building into a terrible, live, on-air downfall for him.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    I think the Cubs end up trading Garza to Detroit, Dempster to NYY, and Zambrano to Miami Marlins.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. GBTS

    [quote name=Recalcitrant Blogger Nate]From previous:

    How much longer can ESPN employ Lee Corso? I used to think he was drunk during broadcasts, but now I’m starting to think he’s got Alzheimers or something. He can barely articulate anything. It’s sad more than anything. I know he’s annoying, but I can only see it building into a terrible, live, on-air downfall for him.[/quote]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T8Qw05kgF9M

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. dylanj

    The Cubs will have a young rotation outside of Dempster and maybe Z. If Casher starts he really shouldnt go 200 IP. Probably the same with Wood

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. mb21

    If Cashner is given 200 innings I quit. I can’t imagine Sveum is dumb enough to do that. And if he is then he should be fired after Cashner throws inning 151. If that doesn’t happen then I’m done. Fuck it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. JMan

    [quote name=dylanj]I think Dempster stays until the deadline.[/quote]I’m on the fence with this one. I used to think this but with him being a FA after this year a team won’t get compensation of acquired at the deadline this decreasing his value. The cubs will get much more now vs at the deadline.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. dylanj

    and if Turner is up you have to limit him as well. So they Cubs will def need some veteran arms to eat up innings as well as some depth in AAA for injuries. Andy Sonnanstine come on down!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    I think Rothschild is a part of why NYY would be a good fit for Dempster, although I may be overestimating that. He was a big part of Dempsters revival in the rotation, and the Yankees really need some rotation depth. Dempster has shown he’s good for a good 200 innings at as a number 3 type.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    [quote name=dylanj]and I’m really high on Cashner still. I really hope they dont stick him in the pen[/quote]
    I’m high on Cashner too. I think they need to try to get him about 120 innings this year either from the pen with multiple inning outings or from a few starts. That way he’ll be maybe able to start in 2013. That, or having he and Chris Carpenter as the back end of the bullpen after a trade of Marmol.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. mb21

    I’ll be surprised if they put Cashner in the rotation. I think part of trading Marshall was that they had Cashner to take the 8th inning.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. dylanj

    100-120 IP is fine for Cashner. He really shouldn’t be looking at 200 IP in 2013 either. The Cubs were so weird about flipping him around between SP and RP that his arm never really built up. His top IP was 100 and that was in 2009

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. 26.2cubsfan

    [quote name=dylanj]The Cubs will have a young rotation outside of Dempster and maybe Z. If Casher starts he really shouldnt go 200 IP. Probably the same with Wood[/quote]
    It does seem as though the superfriends are trying to build a rotation for the future. Turner, Wood, Cashner, and Wells make a nice starting core for a few years down the road. It might be rough, and you never know with pitching health (particularly Cashner), but the plan for sustained success is starting to become a little clearer.

    How to fix the fucked-ness of the position players is a whole different picture. These guys are shitty….

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXaqDcb51tI

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    [quote name=dylanj]100-120 IP is fine for Cashner. He really shouldn’t be looking at 200 IP in 2013 either. The Cubs were so weird about flipping him around between SP and RP that his arm never really built up. His top IP was 100 and that was in 2009[/quote]

    Agree, he should approach 180-200 until 2014, and he could also be the closer by that point too

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. GBTS

    [quote name=dylanj]100-120 IP is fine for Cashner. He really shouldn’t be looking at 200 IP in 2013 either. The Cubs were so weird about flipping him around between SP and RP that his arm never really built up. His top IP was 100 and that was in 2009[/quote]At least he got to throw out of the pen in that magical 2010 season where we were just trying to win ball games.

    He also threw a chunk of innings in the AFL in 2009, IIRC.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. mb21

    Cashner

    2006: 24.2 IP
    2007: ??? estimated 70 IP
    2008: 74.1 IP
    2009: 100.1 IP
    2010: 111 IP
    2011: 15.1 IP

    IMO, the ship has sailed on Cashner being a starter. To work him up to 200 innings in an ethical manner, it’s going to take awhile. After throwing 116.1 innings the last two years, Cashner shouldn’t throw more than 125 innings next year. Anything over 140 would be crazy. Maybe 175 the following year and that’s pushing it. I have no idea what would indicate he’s capable of that kind of workload.

    This doesn’t even address his good, but far from great numbers in the minor leagues. I think Cashner could be a really good reliever, but I also don’t think you could ever count on him to stay healthy.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. mb21

    [quote name=dylanj]100-120 IP is fine for Cashner. He really shouldn’t be looking at 200 IP in 2013 either. The Cubs were so weird about flipping him around between SP and RP that his arm never really built up. His top IP was 100 and that was in 2009[/quote]They handled him perfectly until that retarded decision in 2010. Cashner was a closer in college and they worked him up the way they should have. The problem was once he was finally able to go 6 innings they moved him into the bullpen. During this increase, he also landed on the DL.

    I don’t think Cashner has the health to remain in the rotation and I think putting him there would be a rather poor decision. That sucks, but I’d rather get whatever value they can out of him and that’s in the bullpen. Hopefully he has a really good year as the setup man and when they trade Marmol he could take over as the closer.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. GBTS

    [quote name=mb21]Cashner threw 19.2 innings in the AFL in 2009 so that’s a total of 120 innings that year.[/quote]Well that changes a ton. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. mb21

    [quote name=GBTS]Well that changes a ton. (dying laughing)[/quote]Agreed. He should throw no less than 240 innings next year. 280 in 2013 and 355 in 2014.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. Rice Cube

    [quote name=mb21]Agreed. He should throw no less than 240 innings next year. 280 in 2013 and 355 in 2014.[/quote]If he gets to 355 he should accumulate twice as much value as Justin Verlander before his arm jumps out of it’s socket and mutinies. Great plan!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. mb21

    [quote name=ACT]You’re all crazy. Cashner should try to break Will White’s single-season record of 680 innings pitched.[/quote]If he breaks that record people will claim he used steroids and there will always be an asterisk next to that record.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. Rice Cube

    [quote name=ACT]You’re all crazy. Cashner should try to break Will White’s single-season record of 680 innings pitched.[/quote]He might have to learn to throw with his left hand after the right one falls off.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. Rice Cube

    [quote name=ACT]You’re all crazy. Cashner should try to break Will White’s single-season record of 680 innings pitched.[/quote]This was in the 19th century when they still threw underhand and didn’t have curveballs, right?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. Aisle424

    [quote name=mb21]If he breaks that record people will claim he used steroids and there will always be an asterisk next to that record.[/quote]False. He’ll get in the Hall of Fame amid hilarious stories about how he cheated all along.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. Smokestack Lightning

    Cashner should try to break Walter White’s second season record of 42 pounds of meth produced in a single weekend.

    .

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  25. Smokestack Lightning

    Apparently, Theo asked the Yankees for Jesus Montero, Dellin Betances AND Manny Banuelos for Garza. I imagine Cashman must have responded, “Theo, you know you don’t work for the Red Sox anymore, right?”

    For my part, I think the only reason the Cubs should trade Garza is if somebody significantly overpays. Fuck what he’s worth, deal him only if you get many times that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  26. mb21

    Cashner should try to break Walter White’s second season record of 42 pounds of meth produced in a single weekend.

    (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  27. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Smokestack Lightning]Apparently, Theo asked the Yankees for Jesus Montero, Dellin Betances AND Manny Banuelos for Garza. I imagine Cashman must have responded, “Theo, you know you don’t work for the Red Sox anymore, right?”

    For my part, I think the only reason the Cubs should trade Garza is if somebody significantly overpays. Fuck what he’s worth, deal him only if you get many times that.[/quote]
    Yeah, I think a deal that doesn’t bring back one blue chip and a couple of other useful pieces isn’t worth doing. Otherwise, just looks like a straightforward dump to avoid paying the expensive arb years on a player you don’t plan to sign to a long-term deal.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  28. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Smokestack Lightning]
    For my part, I think the only reason the Cubs should trade Garza is if somebody significantly overpays. Fuck what he’s worth, deal him only if you get many times that.[/quote]
    Would he bring back more in midseason when teams are maybe slightly more desperate? Of course by that point his arb salary had been set or he might have been signed to an extension, so maybe not.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  29. mb21

    Speaking of Breaking Bad, how does Bryan Cranston, Aaron Paul and Giancarlo Esposito all win an emmy this year? They gave, without a doubt, the three best performances on television this past year. Cranston wins Best Actor and maybe it should be a co-best supporting actor win for both the others.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  30. mb21

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Would he bring back more in midseason when teams are maybe slightly more desperate? Of course by that point his arb salary had been set or he might have been signed to an extension, so maybe not.[/quote]Probably not. He’d be providing less value over a year and a half and he would be paid more per win.

    All I really care about is getting value back. Getting more would be great, but if you get an equal amount in return you did just fine.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  31. mb21

    Apparently Boras is looking for a 5-year deal for Edwin Jackson. Did something happen with Jackson and he apparently became a good pitcher or something?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  32. Rice Cube

    [quote name=mb21]Apparently Boras is looking for a 5-year deal for Edwin Jackson. Did something happen with Jackson and he apparently became a good pitcher or something?[/quote]He won a World Series.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  33. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]Apparently Boras is looking for a 5-year deal for Edwin Jackson. Did something happen with Jackson and he apparently became a good pitcher or something?[/quote]He saw significant increases in PE (Playoff Experience), LSP (Leadership), and RH (Ring-Having). So he’s like, you know, totally awesome and stuff. Also, ninja.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  34. mb21

    The last time Matt Garza went to the plate at Wrigley Field, Mike Quade told him not to swing. He was worried Garza might hit into a double play, which would keep Starlin Castro from having a shot to get his 200th hit at home. And Garza still swung, grounding out, which led to Castro getting walked intentionally.

    No big deal, maybe. But Greg Maddux wouldn’t have swung.

    “I was in my mode,” Garza said. “I’m going to go out there and compete. I’m not going to give up. That’s what it is.”

    Are the Cubs shopping Garza because he’s a free swinger? Hardly, but after that game on Sept. 21, Quade gave Garza a surprisingly lukewarm endorsement.

    (dying laughing) What the fuck is it with the Cubs beat writers caring so much about Cubs pitchers and their hitting? It’s bizarre.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  35. Rice Cube

    [quote name=mb21](dying laughing) What the fuck is it with the Cubs beat writers caring so much about Cubs pitchers and their hitting? It’s bizarre.[/quote]Maybe they want the DH too.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  36. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21](dying laughing) What the fuck is it with the Cubs beat writers caring so much about Cubs pitchers and their hitting? It’s bizarre.[/quote]They don’t care about the hitting. They only care about whatever fills in the gaps in the reasoning towards the conclusion that all Latino players are hot-tempered, selfish showboats and all black players are angry, white-hating conspiracy theorists.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  37. Suburban kid

    I always thought “Garza” sounded more Italian than Spanish, but apparently it is Galician and the name of many Sephardic Jews as well as Catholics who settled in Mexico, per wiki.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  38. mb21

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]They don’t care about the hitting. They only care about whatever fills in the gaps in the reasoning towards the conclusion that all Latino players are hot-tempered, selfish showboats and all black players are angry, white-hating conspiracy theorists.[/quote]Yeah, but why would they even use hitting as an example? Everybody knows pitchers suck at hitting. It’s weird.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  39. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    Is anyone watching college football today? MSU-Georgia looks like closest game right now

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  40. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    [quote name=Smokestack Lightning]Apparently, Theo asked the Yankees for Jesus Montero, Dellin Betances AND Manny Banuelos for Garza. I imagine Cashman must have responded, “Theo, you know you don’t work for the Red Sox anymore, right?”

    For my part, I think the only reason the Cubs should trade Garza is if somebody significantly overpays. Fuck what he’s worth, deal him only if you get many times that.[/quote]
    where did you see that smokestack?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  41. DamageControlFreak

    [quote name=Recalcitrant Blogger Nate]where did you see that smokestack?[/quote]Probably on MLBTR today
    http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/01/boras-seeks-five-years-for-edwin-jackson.html

    [quote name=Captain Obvious]
    For my part, I think the only reason the Cubs should trade Garza is if somebody significantly overpays. Fuck what he’s worth, deal him only if you get many times that.[/quote]I agree and obviously Theo does as well.
    Acquiring a prospect like Turner is all fine and dandy and might be a good deal, but dealing Garza would put the Cubs “rotation” in a horrible shape.
    As of now, there’s Dempster, Wells and the 2nd Wood. Z is a big question mark. The only other pitchers that could even be considered for a starting job are Cashner, Shark, Coleman. Together that’s 3,5 starters at max, with no fallback option whatsoever. Rebuild or not, that gives me the creeps. Except for Dempster, none of these pitchers could even be considered a number 3 starter. Probably I’m just too stupid to get it, but if the Cubs really trade away Garza, who on earth is supposed to pitch?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  42. Rodrigo

    [quote name=Smokestack Lightning]http://espn.go.com/blog/new-york/yankees/post/_/id/26066/dont-put-out-the-welcome-matt-for-garza-just-yet[/quote]
    The comments in that post remind me that most fans, not just Cubs, are really stupid.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  43. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Rodrigo]The comments in that post remind me that most fans, not just Cubs, are really stupid.[/quote]

    I Dont like matt montero a banuelos are untouchable!
    4 Hours Ago

    CashmanSUX
    Right… Just like Pathetic Phil and Joba the Fat were “untouchable!”

    Nobody develops young starting pitching like Brian Cashman’s Yankees
    4 Hours Ago

    (dying laughing) Nice.

    I tend to agree with some of the commenters that the Cubs are shooting for the moon here and I can understand why the Yankees wouldn’t want to give it to them.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  44. mb21

    but if the Cubs really trade away Garza, who on earth is supposed to pitch?

    Blake DeWitt, Jeff Baker, Darwin Barney, Koyie Hill. If the Cubs trade Garza it doesn’t matter who is starting. They’re not going to come close to 70 wins (probably won’t even with Garza). Trading Garza ensure you get the 1st or 2nd pick in next year’s draft.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  45. mb21

    Based on everything I’ve been reading I don’t think there’s any doubt that Fielder won’t end up signing with the Nationals.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  46. Suburban kid

    [quote name=mb21]Based on everything I’ve been reading I don’t think there’s any doubt that Fielder won’t end up signing with the Nationals.[/quote]So then who do you think he’ll sign with?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  47. mb21

    [quote name=Suburban kid]So then who do you think he’ll sign with?[/quote]I wrote that comment at one point and then came back 30 minutes later and edited it. I meant he will sign with the Nats. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  48. Suburban kid

    [quote name=mb21]I wrote that comment at one point and then came back 30 minutes later and edited it. I meant he will sign with the Nats. (dying laughing)[/quote]
    ||
    ||
    ||
    V

    [quote name=26.2cubsfan]fucked-ness [/quote].

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  49. Rice Cube

    There’s a “decent chance” the Braves wait to obtain a shortstop/utility infielder and see who becomes available in Spring Training. As for rumors linking the Braves to free agent infielder Ryan Theriot, O’Brien suggests the team’s interest was “overstated” and points out that GM Frank Wren will likely look for a strong defensive shortstop.

    Ouch.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  50. bubblesdachimp

    Couple drunk rambling thoughts:

    1. Congrats to my Gamecocks. 11-2 Great year.

    2. Really hope alshon is a bear next year.

    3. Anyone have any thoughts on Y2J coming back

    4. This is one of the most intelligent boards i have been apart of. Becuase of that I think that sometimes we UNDERVALUE our own prospects/players becuase that is what the numbers tell us they are worth. I look at it this way

    s. Matt Garza is an awesome pitcher. He was significantly better than ever before. This is after he has already done well in the AL. That means something. This is a guy that we have for 2 more years AND could be an ace of a contending Cubs team (granted he might cost some more)
    1. Which means i think we hold the cards. If you dont want to give up your #1 prospect do not talk to us. If you dont want to give up your #1 then unless you got #2 and #3 get to stepping.
    2. I only want to deal with Detroit (turner) Yanks (Montero OR Banuelos and Bettances) Toronto (Gose or Marasnick AND Mcguire) or Miami (Lomo AND Yellich)

    Having said that i am probably the dumbest person here. But i jsut think we have an asset that cant be just measured in win shares per year over 2 years.

    Go gamecocks Y2J

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  51. mb21

    But i jsut think we have an asset that cant be just measured in win shares per year over 2 years.

    All assets (players) can be measured with wins. Albert Pujols was measured by wins this offseason with his contract. Sometimes a team will overpay, but there’s a reason the Blue Jays and Yankees have backed out. There’s a reason the Red Sox will and the Tigers will too. Expecting to get that kind of return is essentially a decision to keep the player. That’s fine. I don’t really care one way or the other. I think trading Garza could help hurry the rebuild along, but it’s still going to be a very long time before this team contends. That’s true whether they trade Garza or not.

    Matt Garza is not an ace. Garza’s true talent is not what he did last year. We know this. We can’t ignore it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  52. mb21

    The market for Garza has already been set. Latos and Gonzalez have 4 years of club control remaining. The average of those 4 years is going to pay him about 50% of their market value. They essentially get 2 years of free production. They are also better than Garza who has 2 years of club control paying him about 70% of his market value. That’s a little more than half a season worth of production for free. Garza is worth nowhere near what was given up for either of Latos or Gonzalez.

    That doesn’t mean there isn’t one team out there who won’t give them as much or even more. It just means that he’s not worth it and any team that would give up that much would be insane.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  53. bubblesdachimp

    MB,

    I think you are correct in a sense. I am not smart enough to do this but can yall do an analysis on the trades Theo made with Boston and Jed made with San Diego to see if they acquired surplus value?

    Think it might be interesting to see. If not thats cool as well…

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  54. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    [quote name=bubblesdachimp]I think both the rose bowl and this fiesta bowl should shutup the anti-rematch people[/quote]
    defense= important sometimes. Oregon beats the brakes off Stanford AT stanford. LSU handles Oregon on a neutral field.

    Mike Gundy’s kid is fat.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  55. bubblesdachimp

    If LSU or Bama plays any other team in the nation they are 14 point favorites at least.. They are that good. No defense was played in either the rose or fiesta bowl

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  56. Recalcitrant Blogger Nate

    All these OSU split title people better hold on and make sure LSU don’t go 14-0.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  57. dylanj

    MD is forgetting a key point- Latos is gone. So if you are a team who wants to win now and needs a SP the Cubs have about the best one left. So Theo can use that as leverage

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  58. bubblesdachimp

    [quote name=dylanj]MD is forgetting a key point- Latos is gone. So if you are a team who wants to win now and needs a SP the Cubs have about the best one left. So Theo can use that as leverage[/quote]
    Agreed.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  59. DamageControlFreak

    [quote name=mb21]Blake DeWitt, Jeff Baker, Darwin Barney, Koyie Hill. If the Cubs trade Garza it doesn’t matter who is starting. They’re not going to come close to 70 wins (probably won’t even with Garza). Trading Garza ensure you get the 1st or 2nd pick in next year’s draft.[/quote]
    But that’s exactly the kind of rebuilding I do not get.
    Acquiring a prospect like Turner is fine, but he’s still some years away from becoming a MLB regular.
    And in the meantime the Cubs have no rotation and sit around with their fingers up their ass, waiting for their one messiah prospect to pan out? Doesn’t make sense to me.

    I’m not sure what else make sense though. Building around Garza, as Theo suggested might be a decent option. But since I agree he’s not really an ace, it probably still won’t be enough. But what then? Suffer thru 2012 and hoping to score a top pitcher next offseason? Or wait 3 or 4 or 5 years for some yet-to-be-acquired-talent to emerge? Hell, the outlook for ptiching seems even more frustating than for offense.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  60. Suburban kid

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Ouch.[/quote](dying laughing)

    Now we just need one more GM to complete the trifecta.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  61. mb21

    [quote name=dylanj]MD is forgetting a key point- Latos is gone. So if you are a team who wants to win now and needs a SP the Cubs have about the best one left. So Theo can use that as leverage[/quote]But some teams wouldn’t even consider giving up that much for Latos or Gonzalez, dj. If they were to consider it, they’d have done so for the better pitcher. The Yankees wouldn’t give up Nunez and Montero for Cliff Lee.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  62. mb21

    [quote name=bubblesdachimp]MB,

    I think you are correct in a sense. I am not smart enough to do this but can yall do an analysis on the trades Theo made with Boston and Jed made with San Diego to see if they acquired surplus value?

    Think it might be interesting to see. If not thats cool as well…[/quote]In the trades made between Jim Hendry and Theo Epstein, the Cubs came out ahead.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  63. mb21

    [quote name=DamageControlFreak]But that’s exactly the kind of rebuilding I do not get.
    Acquiring a prospect like Turner is fine, but he’s still some years away from becoming a MLB regular.
    And in the meantime the Cubs have no rotation and sit around with their fingers up their ass, waiting for their one messiah prospect to pan out? Doesn’t make sense to me.

    I’m not sure what else make sense though. Building around Garza, as Theo suggested might be a decent option. But since I agree he’s not really an ace, it probably still won’t be enough. But what then? Suffer thru 2012 and hoping to score a top pitcher next offseason? Or wait 3 or 4 or 5 years for some yet-to-be-acquired-talent to emerge? Hell, the outlook for ptiching seems even more frustating than for offense.[/quote]I think signing Fielder would be a good idea and would hurry the rebuilding process but they don’t seem interested and that. They appear content to suck for several years.

    Rebuilding like this makes sense to me though. The Cubs farm system is a joke and with the new CBA they’re not going to be able to improve it much through the draft or international free agency. Trading your star players at the MLB level is the quickest way to do so.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  64. GBTS

    NFL draft fags: I would very much like for the Chicago Bears to acquire this Blackmon fellow. Where will he be drafted, and how can the Bears adjust their position accordingly?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  65. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=GBTS]NFL draft fags: I would very much like for the Chicago Bears to acquire this Blackmon fellow. Where will he be drafted, and how can the Bears adjust their position accordingly?[/quote]
    I can’t see a scenario where he makes it out of the top 10. Assuming no trades, I think he goes to CLE at 4 or JAX at 5.

    Moving from No. 16 to No. 4 would probably require a 2013 first rounder or a 2012 second and third.

    Imo, Blackmon is the best of AJ Green and Julio Jones combined.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  66. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=GBTS]NFL draft fags: I would very much like for the Chicago Bears to acquire this Blackmon fellow. Where will he be drafted, and how can the Bears adjust their position accordingly?[/quote]He’s a top-5 pick, maybe top-3. Bears have no shot. BUt I want him on the team so damn bad.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  67. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]I can’t see a scenario where he makes it out of the top 10. Assuming no trades, I think he goes to CLE at 4 or JAX at 5.

    Moving from No. 16 to No. 4 would probably require a 2013 first rounder or a 2012 second and third.

    Imo, Blackmon is the best of AJ Green and Julio Jones combined.[/quote]Agreed. It’s a deal the Bears just won’t make.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  68. JMan

    But that’s exactly the kind of rebuilding I do not get.
    Acquiring a prospect like Turner is fine, but he’s still some years away from becoming a MLB regular.

    Considering he pitched 12+ innings for the Tigers this year I’d say he’s fairly close to being a regular. In fact should he end up on the Cubs he’d likely be in the rotation for 2012.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  69. Mercurial Outfielder

    The Bears need to draft a OG or two, but this draft is supposed to be deep there, so they can wait until the 2nd and 3rd for that. The 16 pick has to be the best WR available. They must give Jay a competent WR corps to replace the old/dropsy/twitchy/fumbley group they have now.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  70. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=GBTS]
    (dying laughing)
    (dying laughing)
    (dying laughing)
    (dying laughing)[/quote]That’s awesome.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  71. mb21

    [quote name=JMan]Considering he pitched 12+ innings for the Tigers this year I’d say he’s fairly close to being a regular. In fact should he end up on the Cubs he’d likely be in the rotation for 2012.[/quote]Yeah, I think he’d start out in the Cubs rotation this year. It’s possible they’d send him to Iowa for a couple months, but I think he’s a big part of the rotation in 2012.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  72. Dr. Aneus Taint

    My current mock Top 10 is:

    1. IND – Luck
    2. STL – Kalil, OT, USC
    3. MIN – Claiborne, CB, LSU
    4. CLE – Blackmon
    5. MIA (trade) – Griffin, QB, Baylor
    6. TB – Reiff, OT, Iowa
    7. WAS – Richardson, RB, Bama
    8. JAX – Kirkpatrick, CB, Bama
    9. CAR – Still, DT, PSU
    10. BUF – Coples, DE/DT, UNC

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  73. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=GBTS]
    (dying laughing)
    (dying laughing)
    (dying laughing)
    (dying laughing)[/quote]
    I’m so proud to be associated with that site.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  74. dylanj

    Then why is every major writer talking about the Cubs getting a major package back? Either the teams are insane or you aren’t valuing Garza properly. You said Turner wouldn’t be in the package and he is, you said it would be straight up and the hometown paper is saying its Turner +.

    This isn’t a knock on you I’m just saying there seems to be a disconnect with the tools you are using to value Garza and how teams value him.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  75. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint]My current mock Top 10 is:

    1. IND – Luck
    2. STL – Kalil, OT, USC
    3. MIN – Claiborne, CB, LSU
    4. CLE – Blackmon
    5. MIA (trade) – Griffin, QB, Baylor
    6. TB – Reiff, OT, Iowa
    7. WAS – Richardson, RB, Bama
    8. JAX – Kirkpatrick, CB, Bama
    9. CAR – Still, DT, PSU
    10. BUF – Coples, DE/DT, UNC[/quote]Has Barkley not declared yet? Because anyone that drafts RG3 before him at QB is fucking insane. I love RG3, but Barkley is the goods. I think he could end up being better than Luck.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  76. bubblesdachimp

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Has Barkley not declared yet? Because anyone that drafts RG3 before him at QB is fucking insane. I love RG3, but Barkley is the goods. I think he could end up being better than Luck.[/quote]Barkley is going back to school

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  77. Aisle424

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]The Bears need to draft a OG or two, but this draft is supposed to be deep there, so they can wait until the 2nd and 3rd for that. The 16 pick has to be the best WR available. They must give Jay a competent WR corps to replace the old/dropsy/twitchy/fumbley group they have now.[/quote]Do you ignore the defense for now? They are getting older and less reliable. They might have one more solid year left in them before they are just plain ordinary and possibly quite bad, depending on injuries.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  78. JMan

    [quote name=dylanj]Then why is every major writer talking about the Cubs getting a major package back? Either the teams are insane or you aren’t valuing Garza properly. You said Turner wouldn’t be in the package and he is, you said it would be straight up and the hometown paper is saying its Turner +.

    This isn’t a knock on you I’m just saying there seems to be a disconnect with the tools you are using to value Garza and how teams value him.[/quote]Most major writers know very little. It’s pure speculation based upon what information they are being given. If the trade is ever completed we can then break it down and determine if the tools being used to determine Garza’s value are correct.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  79. mb21

    [quote name=dylanj]Then why is every major writer talking about the Cubs getting a major package back? Either the teams are insane or you aren’t valuing Garza properly. You said Turner wouldn’t be in the package and he is, you said it would be straight up and the hometown paper is saying its Turner +.

    This isn’t a knock on you I’m just saying there seems to be a disconnect with the tools you are using to value Garza and how teams value him.[/quote]
    In the Marshall trade someone thought the Cubs would be getting a top 100 prospect. They didn’t. If I had to guess I’d say it’s the Cubs leaking information about teams willing to part with their best prospects. It’s what they should do in the hopes of getting some other team to offer up just as much. The Cubs demands are apparently quite high and they should be for now. It’s also why teams are dropping out of the race to acquire him. Hopefully a team is dumb enough, but I think with all trades Cubs fans are going to end up being pissed off about what they got in return.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  80. Aisle424

    [quote name=dylanj]Then why is every major writer talking about the Cubs getting a major package back? Either the teams are insane or you aren’t valuing Garza properly. You said Turner wouldn’t be in the package and he is, you said it would be straight up and the hometown paper is saying its Turner +.

    This isn’t a knock on you I’m just saying there seems to be a disconnect with the tools you are using to value Garza and how teams value him.[/quote]
    The teams do seem to be scrambling, which is raising the price above what you would expect. But so much of what we hear is conjecture, so we don’t really know what is actually being discussed.

    Maybe the Tigers have seen something in Turner they don’t like so they are trying to sell high while he is still a blue chip prospect. Maybe he has never been discussed, but the Tigers want other teams to think they have so if they don’t get him, it drives up the price for their competitors.

    There are so many moving parts, all we can do is apply logic to the value of the players as we know them. Anything else is based on information we don’t have and subject to massive error.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  81. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Has Barkley not declared yet? Because anyone that drafts RG3 before him at QB is fucking insane. I love RG3, but Barkley is the goods. I think he could end up being better than Luck.[/quote]
    Barkley made the right choice. I think this is the first time I’ve ever said this, but this year’s draft crop looks way better than next year’s. I think Barkley’s probably the fifth-best player overall in this draft, but easily No. 1 next.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  82. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Aisle424]Do you ignore the defense for now? They are getting older and less reliable. They might have one more solid year left in them before they are just plain ordinary and possibly quite bad, depending on injuries.[/quote]The DL is actually quite young and deep (Peppers is old, but otherwise, pretty young and very deep). If they somehow had a shot at a premium DB, then maybe, but you’ve got Grimes, Finnegan and Carlos Rogers all as FA this year, so maybe you go FA at CB. They need to look at LB at some point in the draft, for sure. BUt here’s my take: you have a for-real franchise QB. You MUST surround him with the pieces he needs to succeed. That means you have to draft at OL and WR, because that’s where the most glaring weakness on this team is. If I had to rank the problem areas for the Bears, it’d go like so:

    1a. OL
    1b. WR corps
    2. SS & FS
    3. Aging LB corps
    4. CB
    5. Offensive Coordinator
    6. Lovie’s play not-to-lose strategy

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  83. mb21

    [quote name=JMan]Most major writers know very little. It’s pure speculation based upon what information they are being given. If the trade is ever completed we can then break it down and determine if the tools being used to determine Garza’s value are correct.[/quote]The tools used to evaluate his value are correct. The issue is that it only takes one team to give up more than his value. It’s the same thing with free agency. If a player is worth 3 years and $24 million and there happens to be one team willing to pay $36 million it doesn’t mean the methods used to calculate his value were wrong. Over hundreds of trades the projected value going one way will equal the projected value the other way.

    I hope I’m wrong, but I think people are latching onto every single name they hear and they’re thinking the Cubs are going to get the single best return for a starting pitcher ever. I hope they do and I suppose it’s even possible, but it’s not likely. You’ll need one team bidding against itself. This is where the Cubs come in. They say the Tigers are willing to part with Jacob Turner even tough it makes no sense and have been unwilling to do so in the past. This gets other teams thinking they have to top that offer if they want him.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  84. dylanj

    there’s just too many assumptions in your logic

    1. You assume that BA’s top 100 is the top 100 for the Cubs front office. They have their own valuation.

    2. You use WAR to determine the worth of Latos & predict the value of Garza. Teams have their own metrics

    3. I still think you underestimate the fact that there are a handful of teams who have window to win right now and a smaller handful of teams with + SP available. Latos and Gonzalez are gone but Det, NYY and BOS still need to add to get their trophy. They are still going to make a nice offer to try and do that. The Cubs are on the right side of supply & demand on this one and will probably get more than we think.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  85. mb21

    Maybe the Tigers have seen something in Turner they don’t like so they are trying to sell high while he is still a blue chip prospect. Maybe he has never been discussed, but the Tigers want other teams to think they have so if they don’t get him, it drives up the price for their competitors.

    It’s important to point out that traded players perform worse than expected. There is plenty of evidence to suggest that teams who trade players or let their free agents walk know something other teams don’t. It’s especially evident after the first couple of years. The traded players or free agents who switch teams age much differently than the players who aren’t traded or re-sign with the same team.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  86. Aisle424

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]The DL is actually quite young and deep (Peppers is old, but otherwise, pretty young and very deep). If they somehow had a shot at a premium DB, then maybe, but you’ve got Grimes, Finnegan and Carlos Rogers all as FA this year, so maybe you go FA at CB. They need to look at LB at some point in the draft, for sure. BUt here’s my take: you have a for-real franchise QB. You MUST surround him with the pieces he needs to succeed. That means you have to draft at OL and WR, because that’s where the most glaring weakness on this team is. If I had to rank the problem areas for the Bears, it’d go like so:

    1a. OL
    1b. WR corps
    2. SS & FS
    3. Aging LB corps
    4. CB
    5. Offensive Coordinator
    6. Lovie’s play not-to-lose strategy[/quote]
    Yeah their DL is probably the best part of the team going forward. The playmakers are all old though. Briggs and Urlacher are getting by more on experience than plain athletic edge now. Tillman has his moments, but is getting worse as time goes by.

    I agree that the OL and WR need desperate help, but the defense feels like a house of cards to me, so it may be too late to save this incarnation of the team and we’ll have wasted the best years of the only franchise QB this team has had in my lifetime. I loved McMahon when he was healthy, but Jay is so much better when he’s not running for his life.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  87. GBTS

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]BUt here’s my take: you have a for-real franchise QB. You MUST surround him with the pieces he needs to succeed. [/quote]I approve this message.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  88. dylanj

    and its totally possible that I’m way off base and we get peanuts for Garza but I think we end up with Turner + Oliver + scraps

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  89. mb21

    there’s just too many assumptions in your logic

    1. You assume that BA’s top 100 is the top 100 for the Cubs front office. They have their own valuation.

    2. You use WAR to determine the worth of Latos & predict the value of Garza. Teams have their own metrics

    What would you like me to do? Write a post later today about how teams are interested in Garza. Then I say, “he’s worth something, but we have literally no fucking clue what some teams would pay to get Garza so just start guessing.”

    That’s informative.

    I don’t buy teams overpay because they have a window. Teams don’t overpay on the free agent market when they have a window. It’s been researched and they don’t. Why would they give up more in a trade? It’s wishful thinking. I’m hoping along with you that they get way more than he’s worth, but there’s a reason it’s called “way more than he’s worth.”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  90. mb21

    [quote name=dylanj]and its totally possible that I’m way off base and we get peanuts for Garza but I think we end up with Turner + Oliver + scraps[/quote]I don’t know if you’ll end up being way off base. Some team may overpay. I have no idea. There are 29 teams and it only takes one. The Cubs have to find that one team willing to overpay. They probably exist, but you’re arguing the Cubs get more for Garza than was given up for Latos and Gonzalez. That makes no sense to me whatsoever.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  91. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Aisle424]Yeah their DL is probably the best part of the team going forward. The playmakers are all old though. Briggs and Urlacher are getting by more on experience than plain athletic edge now. Tillman has his moments, but is getting worse as time goes by.

    I agree that the OL and WR need desperate help, but the defense feels like a house of cards to me, so it may be too late to save this incarnation of the team and we’ll have wasted the best years of the only franchise QB this team has had in my lifetime. I loved McMahon when he was healthy, but Jay is so much better when he’s not running for his life.[/quote]Yeah, there’s a calculated risk here, but the Ravens have made it work with an old-ish defense. I think Cutler is miles better than Flacco, but Cutler isn’t working with as good and OL or as good a WR corps. The best thing you can do for an aging defense is limit their snaps and a competent offense does just that. But this 10-15 three-and-outs per game shit kills a defense faster than any opposing run game. The best thing the Bears can do for aging skill players on their defense is make sure they have an offense that can A.) sustain drives and win the field position battle and B.) if needed, can win a game all on its own.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  92. AB

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Firing JA to promote Ruskell would be so Bears.[/quote]
    I remember reading the George McCaskey brought in a bunch of outside experts for drafting and scouting after he took over last year, I’m hoping if he knows how bad the Bears drafting and development had been, he knows how bad Ruskell was in Seattle.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  93. Aisle424

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Yeah, there’s a calculated risk here, but the Ravens have made it work with an old-ish defense. I think Cutler is miles better than Flacco, but Cutler isn’t working with as good and OL or as good a WR corps. The best thing you can do for an aging defense is limit their snaps and a competent offense does just that. But this 10-15 three-and-outs per game shit kills a defense faster than any opposing run game. The best thing the Bears can do for aging skill players on their defense is make sure they have an offense that can A.) sustain drives and win the field position battle and B.) if needed, can win a game all on its own.[/quote]Yeah, but I’m keeping my expectations low since I figure the offense will become useful just in time for the defense being unable to stop anybody, and the offense won’t be good enough to win shootouts just yet.

    Just my worry, but the O-line HAS to be revamped. I could live with the current WRs if Jay had some fucking time to throw. That would be #1 priority, and then improve the WR corp. The Johnny Knox experiment is over. Roy Williams gone. Hester is a 5th receiver at best. Just return kicks, son.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  94. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=AB]I remember reading the George McCaskey brought in a bunch of outside experts for drafting and scouting after he took over last year, I’m hoping if he knows how bad the Bears drafting and development had been, he knows how bad Ruskell was in Seattle.[/quote]Yeah the rumors are that George is a very analytical guy, so it’ll be interesting to see how the process of replacing the GM goes.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  95. Aisle424

    [quote name=AB]I remember reading the George McCaskey brought in a bunch of outside experts for drafting and scouting after he took over last year, I’m hoping if he knows how bad the Bears drafting and development had been, he knows how bad Ruskell was in Seattle.[/quote]
    What is George’s relation to the family? Why wasn’t he put in charge way back when? Too young?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  96. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Aisle424]What is George’s relation to the family? Why wasn’t he put in charge way back when? Too young?[/quote]He’s the younger brother of the previous chairman and formerly director of the ticket office. He was only moved up when Michael stepped down (or as rumor has it, was told by Virginia that it was time to go).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  97. DamageControlFreak

    [quote name=mb21]
    Rebuilding like this makes sense to me though. The Cubs farm system is a joke and with the new CBA they’re not going to be able to improve it much through the draft or international free agency. Trading your star players at the MLB level is the quickest way to do so.[/quote]
    I agree that the Cubs farm system is horrible and that it needs to be restocked heavily. But I don’t feel that shutting down major league operations is the right way to do that.
    They will suck for some time now no matter what, but they should try to retain some minimum level of quality, otherwise I don’t see how any prospect or rookie is supposed to learn the ropes when the whole team is just one big clusterfuck.

    I think that’s part of the idea why they signed DeJesus and RJ. They’re both cheap, can improve the team, and gives them a lot of flexibility to mix and match the available players (and prospects like Jackson) till they find some winning combination.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  98. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Rice Cube]http://hardballtalk.nbcsports.com/2012/01/03/three-more-hall-voters-accuse-jeff-bagwell-of-being-a-juicer/

    Paul Sullivan has a HOF vote?[/quote]Sullivan is a serial miscreant. What a worthless shitstain.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  99. mb21

    I think that’s part of the idea why they signed DeJesus and RJ. They’re both cheap, can improve the team, and gives them a lot of flexibility to mix and match the available players (and prospects like Jackson) till they find some winning combination.

    Agreed, but I think the question with Garza is about whether or not he improves the team by being a Cub or by being traded. There are arguments for and against. Garza is still relatively young so even signing him to an extension isn’t a bad idea, but you better be contending in a couple years if you do that. That’s where signing Fielder comes in.

    It just doesn’t appear the Cubs have any interest in that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  100. Mercurial Outfielder

    Hopefully this point is not considered controversial. Because it’s nothing more than simple logic. By definition, people either have actual information establishing that Bagwell did steroids or they do not. If they do have it, they have not published it. And given how newsworthy such information would be, the only plausible reason they haven’t published it is because their newspapers would not allow them to do it because the information is thin and/or uncorroborated. So: such a stance as the one shown by these gentleman is necessarily either one taken with no information or with information that falls short of the standards to which they usually adhere in their daily work.

    BAM. Someone should staple that to Sullivan’s ever-burgeoning forehead.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  101. mb21

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]2012 Reed Johnson :: 1999 Gary Gaetti[/quote]No, Gaetti was a starter. Johnson is just a back-up. Gaetti was expected to produce a lot of offense. Johnson is expected to fill in from time to time. There’s a big difference between these two.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  102. mb21

    The Cubs were also thinking Gaetti would help the ’99 Cubs contend. I don’t think the Cubs have any dreams about contending in 2012.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  103. Aisle424

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]2012 Reed Johnson :: 1999 Gary Gaetti[/quote]Reed isn’t being given a starting job like Gaetti was, but its pretty close.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  104. Aisle424

    [quote name=Aisle424]Reed isn’t being given a starting job like Gaetti was, but its pretty close.[/quote]
    I didn’t read every word before commenting. Now that we are allowed to eat dinner, what is the punishment?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  105. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]No, Gaetti was a starter. Johnson is just a back-up. Gaetti was expected to produce a lot of offense. Johnson is expected to fill in from time to time. There’s a big difference between these two.[/quote]I just mean in terms of the dropoff from one year to the next. Anyone expecting Reed to produce anything remotely close to the same ballpark on the same continent in the neighboring galaxy in the same epoch as he did last year should be hit in the head with a tack hammer.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  106. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]The Cubs were also thinking Gaetti would help the ’99 Cubs contend. I don’t think the Cubs have any dreams about contending in 2012.[/quote]How fucking dire was that ’99 Cubs IF: Gaetti, Blauser, Morandini, Grace, around the horn. Four drunken, mediocre white guys.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  107. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Rice Cube]

    You guys should probably invest in a shredder.[/quote]You falsely assume I would toss a treasure trove like that in garbage.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  108. Suburban kid

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Sullivan is a serial miscreant. What a worthless shitstain.[/quote]And Philip Hersh is a flatulent pain in the ass, and a bitch’s bastard’s whore.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  109. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Suburban kid]And Philip Hersh is a flatulent pain in the ass, and a bitch’s bastard’s whore.[/quote]My favorite insult in this vein, from John Adams, aimed at Thomas Paine:

    “I am willing you should call this the Age of Frivolity as you do, and would not object if you had named it the Age of Folly, Vice, Frenzy, Brutality, Daemons, Buonaparte, Tom Paine, or the Age of the Burning Brand from Bottomless Pit, or anything but the Age of Reason. I know not whether any man in the world has had more influence on its inhabitants or affairs for the last thirty years than Tom Paine. There can be no severer satyr on the age. For such a mongrel between pig and puppy, begotten by a wild boar on a bitch wolf, never before in any age of the world was suffered by the poltroonery of mankind, to run through such a career of mischief. Call it then the Age of Paine.

    I can only aspire to that combination of vitriol and eloquence.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  110. Aisle424

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]
    I can only aspire to that combination of vitriol and eloquence.[/quote]Suck it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  111. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Suburban kid]MO is such a John Adams-wannabe.[/quote]The Jeffersonian agrarianism around here was wearing thin. Someone had to do something.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  112. mb21

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]I just mean in terms of the dropoff from one year to the next. Anyone expecting Reed to produce anything remotely close to the same ballpark on the same continent in the neighboring galaxy in the same epoch as he did last year should be hit in the head with a tack hammer.[/quote]I don’t think anybody is. He was paid a million bucks and if he produced like last season as a starter he’d be worth about $12 million. Probably a 3-year, $27 million deal is what he’d get if he was expected to produce like last year. He’d also be the best Cubs outfielder by a mile.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  113. Rice Cube

    [quote name=mb21]He wrote a lot to reach the same exact conclusion I did a few weeks ago.[/quote]Correct.

    At this point I’m wondering if the Cubs will just sign Garza to an extension. Or if they’ll just do a straight Turner-for-Garza swap, damn the fans.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  114. mb21

    Cameron makes an excellent point that I had ignored. The valuation of the prospects I’ve been using are actually higher due to inflation. Cameron is right that a hitting prospects ranked 11-25 would be fair value for Garza. Pitchers have a little less value so maybe one ranked in the 8-22 range.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  115. mb21

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Correct.

    At this point I’m wondering if the Cubs will just sign Garza to an extension. Or if they’ll just do a straight Turner-for-Garza swap, damn the fans.[/quote]I said the other day in the comments that I think they keep Garza at this point. They’re not going to get what they reportedly are seeking. I hope they do, but they’re asking for more than what Halladay and Lee cost in a trade. They’re asking for more than what Latos and Gonzalez were worth this offseason.

    I think we’ll see Garza extended sometime in February or March. Something like 5/62.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  116. Rice Cube

    [quote name=mb21]I said the other day in the comments that I think they keep Garza at this point. They’re not going to get what they reportedly are seeking. I hope they do, but they’re asking for more than what Halladay and Lee cost in a trade. They’re asking for more than what Latos and Gonzalez were worth this offseason.

    I think we’ll see Garza extended sometime in February or March. Something like 5/62.[/quote]I’d be okay with that. Seems that making the trade for the sake of doing it doesn’t make complete sense if they’re only getting Jacob Turner and maybe some scraps and nothing else, plus if they keep Garza the fans will stop freaking out so much. Reasonable extension figure.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  117. Rice Cube

    Basically it seems the likely outcomes (if Theo and Jed are as smart as we think they are) are:

    1. They rape the Tigers in a trade to get Turner, Andy Oliver, and prospects #8-20 on the depth chart (last part a bit facetious)

    2. They keep Garza and sign to a reasonable extension.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  118. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=dylanj]Reed has always hit LHP. If you use him right and his back doesn’t explode he will do just fine[/quote]Barring injury that forces him into regular PT, I see him being DFA’d before the trade deadline, as he’ll be injured or hitting .204. Or both.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  119. mb21

    [quote name=Rice Cube]I’d be okay with that. Seems that making the trade for the sake of doing it doesn’t make complete sense if they’re only getting Jacob Turner and maybe some scraps and nothing else, plus if they keep Garza the fans will stop freaking out so much. Reasonable extension figure.[/quote]If the Cubs can get Jacob Turner for Garza you have to pull the trigger on that deal. Turner is still a bit of an unknown, but it’s possible he’d be better than Garza in a year or two. I think a lot of scouts would say he would be. And he’s cheaper.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  120. JMan

    [quote name=mb21]Cameron makes an excellent point that I had ignored. The valuation of the prospects I’ve been using are actually higher due to inflation. Cameron is right that a hitting prospects ranked 11-25 would be fair value for Garza. Pitchers have a little less value so maybe one ranked in the 8-22 range.[/quote]Turner definitely sits in the 8-22 range. Turner straight up is worth the trade; getting anything more is cherry.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  121. Rice Cube

    [quote name=mb21]If the Cubs can get Jacob Turner for Garza you have to pull the trigger on that deal. Turner is still a bit of an unknown, but it’s possible he’d be better than Garza in a year or two. I think a lot of scouts would say he would be. And he’s cheaper.[/quote]That seems reasonable to me as well but I’m pretty sure most fans would totally flip shit because prospects beer chicken.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  122. mb21

    I don’t really care about Oliver. He has serious command issues. his minor league numbers have been mediocre and he’s more than likely a reliever.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  123. mb21

    [quote name=JMan]Turner definitely sits in the 8-22 range. Turner straight up is worth the trade; getting anything more is cherry.[/quote]I think Turner is probably overpaying because he’s MLB ready right now. If I was in charge of the Tigers there’s no way I’d trade Turner for Garza.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  124. Rice Cube

    If this hypothetical trade happens…

    Rotation:

    Dempster
    Travis Wood
    Zambrano (?)
    Turner
    Wells

    Bullpen:

    Sonnanstine (swing man?)
    Corpas
    Cashner
    Samardzija
    Russell
    Marmol
    Random crap

    I probably forgot somebody.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  125. Aisle424

    [quote name=Rice Cube]If this hypothetical trade happens…

    Rotation:

    Dempster
    Travis Wood
    Zambrano (?)
    Turner
    Wells

    Bullpen:

    Sonnanstine (swing man?)
    Corpas
    Cashner
    Samardzija
    Russell
    Marmol
    Random crap

    I probably forgot somebody.[/quote]
    Don’t know if you are putting those starters in order, but based on Z’s performance in Venezuela, I think I’d put them:

    Dempster
    T. Wood
    Wells
    Turner
    Zambrano

    You did forget Kerry Wood, assuming he signs again. Did he already?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  126. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Aisle424]Don’t know if you are putting those starters in order, but based on Z’s performance in Venezuela, I think I’d put them:

    Dempster
    T. Wood
    Wells
    Turner
    Zambrano

    You did forget Kerry Wood, assuming he signs again. Did he already?[/quote]I don’t think Wood signed yet. He kind of disappeared off the radar for a while.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  127. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Bruce Levine chat]Jonathon (Anaheim Ca)

    With all the transactions made by Theo, mainly the dumping of salary and the banishment of two of the Cubs top prospects, what direction is he taking the team in?

    Bruce Levine (1:15 PM)

    Younger, more athletuc, more left-handed and better defensively. All priorities for Epstein and Hoyer.[/quote]
    I’m 99% sure he was talking about Colvin and LeMahieu. In which case, (dying laughing) + facepalm

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  128. Aisle424

    [quote name=Rice Cube]I’m 99% sure he was talking about Colvin and LeMahieu. In which case, (dying laughing) + facepalm[/quote]
    He probably meant Koyie Hill and John Grabow.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  129. Rodrigo Ramirez

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Sullivan is a serial miscreant. What a worthless shitstain.[/quote]
    He’s more. I think he’s like the BBWAA President for the Chicago Chapter.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  130. mb21

    [quote name=Aisle424]Don’t know if you are putting those starters in order, but based on Z’s performance in Venezuela, I think I’d put them:

    Dempster
    T. Wood
    Wells
    Turner
    Zambrano

    You did forget Kerry Wood, assuming he signs again. Did he already?[/quote]Just looked at Z’s numbers in the VWL. Not good. 15 strikeouts to 10 walks in 17 innings of work in a league that is comparable to AA. Certainly not a large sample, but not at all good.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  131. GBTS

    [quote name=mb21]Carlos Silva ————-> Red Sox

    Are the Cubs still paying his salary?[/quote]Yes, except the money they were going to use on Silva is now going to DeJesus, so actually they are paying Carlos Silva $18M this season.

    /Sullivan’d

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  132. Aisle424

    [quote name=GBTS]Can someone tell me what Norv Turner has to do to get fired?[/quote]
    Volunteer with Second Mile.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  133. dylanj

    that article on the titanic claims the cruise operators have recreated the conditions on the ship. That sucks for the hundreds of Irishmen forced to shovel coal

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  134. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=dylanj]that article on the titanic claims the cruise operators have recreated the conditions on the ship. That sucks for the hundreds of Irishmen forced to shovel coal[/quote]BEIDH AR LA LINN

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  135. Rice Cube

    [quote name=ACT]The argument goes something like this: ERA is just a number. Look at all his wins![/quote]Only the numbers that help their case will be considered. You’ve been warned.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  136. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=dylanj]such poetry[/quote]Poetry? You wouldn’t know Frank O’Hara from MC Hammer. Go talk to Brainy Smurf.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  137. Pinetar

    [quote name=ACT]Those CBS sports writers have a serious man-crush on Jack Morris.[/quote]

    What’s the issue with Jack Morris? He was a very good pitcher. 18 year career and an ERA under 4 in the AL is nothing to sneeze at.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  138. GBTS

    [quote name=Pinetar]What’s the issue with Jack Morris? He was a very good pitcher. 18 year career and an ERA under 4 in the AL is nothing to sneeze at.[/quote]Yeah but I heard he did steroids.

    /howitstarts

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  139. ACT

    [quote name=Pinetar]What’s the issue with Jack Morris? He was a very good pitcher. 18 year career and an ERA under 4 in the AL is nothing to sneeze at.[/quote]Well, if it were the Hall of Very Good, I don’t think there would be a controversy.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  140. ACT

    Morris’ ERA would be the highest of any HOF inductee, and he wasn’t exactly pitching in a pitcher’s era. His ERA+ is 105.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  141. ACT

    Frankly, though, I wouldn’t mind if people were making coherent arguments for Morris’ induction. It’s just that we mostly just see “You had to be there”-type arguments, and anecdotes about how he pitched well in a few important games.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  142. Rice Cube

    [quote name=ACT]Frankly, though, I wouldn’t mind if people were making coherent arguments for Morris’ induction. It’s just that we mostly just see “You had to be there”-type arguments, and anecdotes about how he pitched well in a few important games.[/quote]I think the general consensus is that now that Bert Blyleven is in, there’s no reason to keep Morris out. At least that’s what I’ve read, which is why I expect his vote total to take a significant jump.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  143. Mercurial Outfielder

    If Tim Raines got the groundswell of support Blyleven and Morris got/is getting, he’d be in.

    And I’ve yet to hear a coherent argument as to why Molitor’s cocaine use matters so much less than Raines’.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  144. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]If Tim Raines got the groundswell of support Blyleven and Morris got/is getting, he’d be in.

    And I’ve yet to hear a coherent argument as to why Molitor’s cocaine use matters so much less than Raines’.[/quote]Color. Duh.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  145. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Reedz —> 1 year, $1.15MM[/quote]Hopefully he finally uses his money to buy a fucking razor.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  146. mb21

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Hopefully he finally uses his money to buy a fucking razor.[/quote]I hope he just grows a big fucking beard.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  147. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]I hope he just grows a big fucking beard.[/quote]One of the two. But this Guy Fieri douchebeard he grows has to go.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  148. mb21

    If Morris pitched better after the age of 33 I’d be in favor of him getting into the HOF. He didn’t. He was very good through his age 32 season, but pretty bad after that. He was so good prior to 33 that he belongs in. He dropped off the face of the planet after age 32. He had a 3.55 ERA before that and 4.5 after.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  149. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]One of the two. But this Guy Fieri douchebeard he grows has to go.[/quote]Perhaps the moderation of beard length is the source of his intangible powers.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  150. mb21

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]One of the two. But this Guy Fieri douchebeard he grows has to go.[/quote]Reed’s “beard” is similar to the Cubs plan since 2009. They weren’t going to win now. They weren’t trying to win later. Reed doesn’t have a beard now. He’s not going to have a beard later. Perfect match.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  151. mb21

    [quote name=Rice Cube]Perhaps the moderation of beard length is the source of his intangible powers.[/quote]I think if he had a huge beard he’d be the best player in baseball. It’s all about the beard. The bigger the beard, the better the player.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  152. Rice Cube

    [quote name=mb21]I think if he had a huge beard he’d be the best player in baseball. It’s all about the beard. The bigger the beard, the better the player.[/quote]We should write him a letter telling him to out-Brian Wilson Brian Wilson.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  153. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]I think if he had a huge beard he’d be the best player in baseball. It’s all about the beard. The bigger the beard, the better the player.[/quote]In that case, I’m currently a better player than Reed Johnson.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  154. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]In that case, I’m currently a better player than Reed Johnson.[/quote]How are you at diving into brick walls?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  155. mb21

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]In that case, I’m currently a better player than Reed Johnson.[/quote](dying laughing) me too

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  156. Suburban kid

    [quote name=Suburban kid]Has anyone got an update on Matt Garza?[/quote]http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/01/matt-garza-rumors-tuesday.html

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  157. mb21

    [quote name=Suburban kid]http://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2012/01/matt-garza-rumors-tuesday.html[/quote]So the Cubs have essentially set the price for Garza so high that a trade won’t get done. That makes sense if you think you can sign him to an extension at a decent price.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  158. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]http://www.suntimes.com/9725535-417/charlie-trotter-to-close-his-world-renowned-chicago-eatery.html[/quote]Good for him!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  159. mb21

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Good for him![/quote]Yep. It’s also a reason for me to go to Chicago sometime in the next 8 months. The Cubs don’t qualify as a reason to visit Chicago these days. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  160. Mucker

    So you say Garza isn’t a true ACE? Then what’s your definition of a true ACE? And if he’s not an ACE, is he a #1? What’s your definition of a #1? Is a #1 an ACE? Who really is an ACE?

    /Al Yellon’d

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  161. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mac]So you say Garza isn’t a true ACE? Then what’s your definition of a true ACE? And if he’s not an ACE, is he a #1? What’s your definition of a #1? Is a #1 an ACE? Who really is an ACE?

    /Al Yellon’d[/quote]

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  162. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]Yep. It’s also a reason for me to go to Chicago sometime in the next 8 months. The Cubs don’t qualify as a reason to visit Chicago these days. (dying laughing)[/quote]You better call quick, that place is gonna book solid with a quickness.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  163. mb21

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]You better call quick, that place is gonna book solid with a quickness.[/quote]I have a friend who worked with him for a long time who has gotten me in before, but since he’s only open 4 days a week now that may not be possible. I may have to actually plan something. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  164. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]I have a friend who worked with him for a long time who has gotten me in before, but since he’s only open 4 days a week now that may not be possible. I may have to actually plan something. (dying laughing)[/quote](dying laughing), indeed. If you want some recs for other places while you’re in town, let me know.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  165. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mac]So you say Garza isn’t a true ACE? Then what’s your definition of a true ACE? And if he’s not an ACE, is he a #1? What’s your definition of a #1? Is a #1 an ACE? Who really is an ACE?

    /Al Yellon’d[/quote]

    Okay, now I feel better.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  166. Rice Cube

    How does one calculate the run contribution of each player in a single game? I had this little bet going on that the Cubs could score more than 76 runs in April (or a bit more than 3.3 runs per game) even with a shitastic lineup.

    That’s based on the 76 points scored by the Bulls in tonight’s victory BTW. Atlanta FAIL.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  167. ACT

    [quote name=Rice Cube]How does one calculate the run contribution of each player in a single game?[/quote]Linear weights?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  168. Rice Cube

    [quote name=ACT]Linear weights?[/quote]I don’t really know. Not an expert (dying laughing)

    When doing game previews last season berselius used to have projected runs scored by each team and I didn’t really know how those were calculated. I guess you can’t really do a detailed calculation until you know what the starting lineup is and who the pitchers are. For my purposes I think maybe it’s best to figure out the projected number of runs scored over the season and then divide by 162.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  169. DamageControlFreak

    [quote name=mb21]I have a friend who worked with him for a long time who has gotten me in before, but since he’s only open 4 days a week now that may not be possible. I may have to actually plan something. (dying laughing)[/quote]How did you like your first time around?
    When I went there in 2008, I was pretty disappointed. The whole concept of showcasing the full flavor of certain qualitiy, locally produced items sounds great, but I felt he really overdid it to the point where single flavors where too bold and the whole menu seemed kinda unbalanced.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  170. mb21

    [quote name=Rice Cube]I don’t really know. Not an expert (dying laughing)

    When doing game previews last season berselius used to have projected runs scored by each team and I didn’t really know how those were calculated. I guess you can’t really do a detailed calculation until you know what the starting lineup is and who the pitchers are. For my purposes I think maybe it’s best to figure out the projected number of runs scored over the season and then divide by 162.[/quote]I set up the game previews and I used wRC+ to estimate runs scored. Using Base Runs would be better, but a bit more complicated. After the Cubs projections are all in I can send that spreadsheet along to you.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  171. mb21

    [quote name=DamageControlFreak]How did you like your first time around?
    When I went there in 2008, I was pretty disappointed. The whole concept of showcasing the full flavor of certain qualitiy, locally produced items sounds great, but I felt he really overdid it to the point where single flavors where too bold and the whole menu seemed kinda unbalanced.[/quote]I first went back in 1993 and loved it. Absolutely loved it. The next time I went (a few years later) I still loved it. I didn’t get back there until 2000 and it wasn’t as good as it was early on. It was still awesome though. I went in 2000, 2001 and 2002. I’d go there each time I went to Chicago to see the Cubs and haven’t been to Wrigley since 2002. Alinea is probably the best place in Chicago these days, right? If I come up to Chicago to go to Trotter’s I’m going to check that place out too.

    I have a soft spot for Trottter because he was the inspiration for me when I started cooking. At that time he was the best around. He’s been passed now, but I’m pretty sure I’ll enjoy it.

    BTW, if not Alinea (being the best), which one is?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  172. mb21

    [quote name=Suburban kid]Offseason ———————————> boring[/quote]That’s what happens when the best player your team has acquired is David DeJesus.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  173. Suburban kid

    Also

    [quote name=mb21]That’s what happens when baseball games haven’t been played for the last two months.[/quote]
    (All due respect to the Carribbean leagues and HP)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  174. mb21

    Yeah, I couldn’t care less about the winter league games either. I’m actually surprised college baseball doesn’t do better considering the interest some people have in inferior baseball.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  175. Suburban kid

    Well, college baseball overlaps ST and the regular season.

    I could see getting into lesser leagues in the winter if they were available to watch easily and the teams had the same players more or less year to year, to provide a sense of character for the teams and league.

    I really like the WBC, so maybe more of a tournament format for winter baseball would grab my attention.

    But yeah, it’s never quite the same as MLB.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  176. Rice Cube

    [quote name=mb21]I set up the game previews and I used wRC+ to estimate runs scored. Using Base Runs would be better, but a bit more complicated. After the Cubs projections are all in I can send that spreadsheet along to you.[/quote]That was supposed to be a positive faget point but the buttons are small and close together on the mobile app and I have no depth perception.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  177. Dr. Aneus Taint

    [quote name=Suburban kid]Why did the guy tackle his own teammate?[/quote]
    He just wouldn’t listen…

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  178. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Suburban kid]Why did the guy tackle his own teammate?[/quote]Would you ask Tom Petty that question?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  179. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]I first went back in 1993 and loved it. Absolutely loved it. The next time I went (a few years later) I still loved it. I didn’t get back there until 2000 and it wasn’t as good as it was early on. It was still awesome though. I went in 2000, 2001 and 2002. I’d go there each time I went to Chicago to see the Cubs and haven’t been to Wrigley since 2002. Alinea is probably the best place in Chicago these days, right? If I come up to Chicago to go to Trotter’s I’m going to check that place out too.

    I have a soft spot for Trottter because he was the inspiration for me when I started cooking. At that time he was the best around. He’s been passed now, but I’m pretty sure I’ll enjoy it.

    BTW, if not Alinea (being the best), which one is?[/quote]It’s probably Alinea. They pulled 3 MIchelin stars and Achatz is a fucking badass in the kitchen. With that said, I can give you some more off-the-beaten path type recs if you want to try some other stuff while you’re there.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  180. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]The 40-man roster is full. That’s just odd.[/quote]How long has it been since that was the case. Almost 2 years now, yes?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  181. mb21

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]It’s probably Alinea. They pulled 3 MIchelin stars and Achatz is a fucking badass in the kitchen. With that said, I can give you some more off-the-beaten path type recs if you want to try some other stuff while you’re there.[/quote]I’ll probably only come up for 3 or 4 days. Trotter’s and Alinea are musts. I haven’t eaten at Alinea since I haven’t been to Chicago while it’s been open. What one restaurant must I eat at while I’m there other than those two?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  182. mb21

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]How long has it been since that was the case. Almost 2 years now, yes?[/quote]They were full when the season began each of the last two years, but never this early. I really don’t understand it. I’m less than impressed with the guys they chose to protect over Ryan Flaherty. There are at least 6 or 7 guys on the 40-man roster that I feel Flaherty should have been protected before they were. I’d actually rather have Flaherty on the 40-man than Soriano.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  183. GBTS

    [quote name=mb21]What one restaurant must I eat at while I’m there other than those two?[/quote]There’s a Subway under the El on Van Buren that I like.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  184. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]I’ll probably only come up for 3 or 4 days. Trotter’s and Alinea are musts. I haven’t eaten at Alinea since I haven’t been to Chicago while it’s been open. What one restaurant must I eat at while I’m there other than those two?[/quote]Damn. Good question. I’ll give you the three I would choose between, and you can look them up and make your choice: Topolobampo, The Publican, and Bistro Campagne.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  185. mb21

    The funny thing is that the best outfielder in the Cubs organization isn’t even among those 7, which is fine. No reason to burn his service time just yet, but that makes me laugh. I’m not sure the Cubs can justify leaving spring training without Brett Jackson, but I’m sure they’ll find their excuses like other teams do.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  186. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]7 outfielders on the 40-man.

    Marlon Byrd
    Tony Campana
    David DeJesus
    Reed Johnson
    Dave Sappelt
    Alfonso Soriano
    Matthew Szczur[/quote]WTF? No BJax, but Szczczczczczczczczczczczur makes it?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  187. DamageControlFreak

    [quote name=mb21] BTW, if not Alinea (being the best), which one is?[/quote]I definitely liked Alinea A LOT more than Trotters. I always felt like I should try Trotter again, since the menu changes alot quickly, but I never felt like ponying up $500 again for a place i didn’t really like.

    IMO, Alineas only competitor for best restaurant in the city would be Next. Never been there myself, but if I still lived in Chicago (and managed to score tickets) it would be my very first choice. I feel it’s it among the most exciting concepts in the culinary world and given the rave reviews it seems to be able to live up to the hype.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  188. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]They were full when the season began each of the last two years, but never this early. I really don’t understand it. I’m less than impressed with the guys they chose to protect over Ryan Flaherty. There are at least 6 or 7 guys on the 40-man roster that I feel Flaherty should have been protected before they were. I’d actually rather have Flaherty on the 40-man than Soriano.[/quote]Ryan Flaherty is the new Marquez Smith. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  189. mb21

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]Damn. Good question. I’ll give you the three I would choose between, and you can look them up and make your choice: Topolobampo, The Publican, and Bistro Campagne.[/quote]That wins just because the name is awesome.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  190. mb21

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]WTF? No BJax, but Szczczczczczczczczczczczur makes it?[/quote]Szczur had to be protected and Jackson doesn’t. I’m fine with that. I’d prefer the Cubs not call Jackson up until sometime in June. I just think it’s funny their best outfielder isn’t among the 7 on the 40-man roster.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  191. mb21

    [quote name=DamageControlFreak]I definitely liked Alinea A LOT more than Trotters. I always felt like I should try Trotter again, since the menu changes alot quickly, but I never felt like ponying up $500 again for a place i didn’t really like.

    IMO, Alineas only competitor for best restaurant in the city would be Next. Never been there myself, but if I still lived in Chicago (and managed to score tickets) it would be my very first choice. I feel it’s it among the most exciting concepts in the culinary world and given the rave reviews it seems to be able to live up to the hype.[/quote]I hadn’t heard of Next. Sounds intriguing. I’ve read the same thing about Alinea.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  192. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]WTF? No BJax, but Szczczczczczczczczczczczur makes it?[/quote]I think they had to protect Szczur from the Rule 5 because of some goofball snafu when setting up his signing bonus. Brett Jackson isn’t Rule 5 eligible yet.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  193. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Dr. Aneus Taint][/quote]I assume the tackler was under strict orders to not let the tacklee do anything stupid, like try to run the ball out when the cover team was already on the 5-yard line.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  194. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]That wins just because the name is awesome.[/quote](dying laughing), that’s the upscale side of Bayless’ Frontera Grill. The tasting menus he puts together are really wonderful. BUt check out the other two, as well.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  195. mb21

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder](dying laughing), that’s the upscale side of Bayless’ Frontera Grill. The tasting menus he puts together are really wonderful. BUt check out the other two, as well.[/quote]This guy?

    (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  196. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]This guy?

    (dying laughing)[/quote]No, (dying laughing), his brother, Rick:

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  197. GBTS

    At Skip Bayless’ restaurant, every time you order something the server complains how disappointing of a choice that was.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  198. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=GBTS]At Skip Bayless’ restaurant, every time you order something the server complains how disappointing of a choice that was.[/quote]And then points out that if you had just wanted it more, your meal would have been perfect.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  199. mb21

    Yeah, I know, MO. It’s just whenever I see the name Bayless I immediately think of the lesser brother. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  200. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=mb21]Yeah, I know, MO. It’s just whenever I see the name Bayless I immediately think of the lesser brother. (dying laughing)[/quote](dying laughing), I wonder how often that is the case. Speaking of Bayless, if you plan to go in the spring, this is a fun thing to do: http://www.shoresgardenconsulting.com/tours.html

    His garden is amazing. But get on the list now, it fills up quick.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  201. GBTS

    If you want, MB, I go to that Subway on my lunch break a lot, I know one of the two workers pretty well. I could probably get you cookies when you go, depending which one is at the register.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  202. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=GBTS]If you want, MB, I go to that Subway on my lunch break a lot, I know one of the two workers pretty well. I could probably get you cookies when you go, depending which one is at the register.[/quote]I think they prefer to be called “sandwich artists,” thank you very much.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  203. Rice Cube

    [quote name=GBTS]They’re also going to force a Shawshank reference into every single acquisition too.[/quote]You get busy running, or you get busy TOOTBLANing.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  204. GBTS

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]God damn cats crawling up trees, five times five is twenty five. FUCK Bill Simmons. FUCK HIM.[/quote].

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  205. Rice Cube

    Don’t recall if anyone saw this, but apparently PedoBear showed up for the Penn State bowl game:

    No, I don’t read every post.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  206. WenningtonsGorillaCock

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]It’s probably Alinea. They pulled 3 MIchelin stars and Achatz is a fucking badass in the kitchen. With that said, I can give you some more off-the-beaten path type recs if you want to try some other stuff while you’re there.[/quote]
    Alinea remains the best meal I’ve ever had. I’ve been to Next twice, and it’s nearly as good (rotating concept, different menu quarterly). Other supremely awesome places to check out are Schwa (seasonal, tiny, hard to get into), Topolopampo (covered above), Publican (belgian beers and all things pork), Longman and Eagle (better for brunch, excellent drinks), Great Lake (named best pizza on Earth by GQ), ING (the only place I know of that has miracle berries), Blackbird (good, but overrated in my opinion), Kuma’s Corner (finest burgers on the planet, good beer selection, insanely loud death metal at all times), Hot Doug’s (gourmet hot dogs served by the friendliest man in town), Belly Shack (Korean/Puerto Rican fusion fast food). I’m probably forgetting a lot.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  207. Rodrigo Ramirez

    [quote name=mb21]I’ll probably only come up for 3 or 4 days. Trotter’s and Alinea are musts. I haven’t eaten at Alinea since I haven’t been to Chicago while it’s been open. What one restaurant must I eat at while I’m there other than those two?[/quote]
    You have to check out Moto- Homar Cantu is one the leading food innovators in the world right now.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  208. Rodrigo Ramirez

    [quote name=WenningtonsGorillaCock]Alinea remains the best meal I’ve ever had. I’ve been to Next twice, and it’s nearly as good (rotating concept, different menu quarterly). Other supremely awesome places to check out are Schwa (seasonal, tiny, hard to get into), Topolopampo (covered above), Publican (belgian beers and all things pork), Longman and Eagle (better for brunch, excellent drinks), Great Lake (named best pizza on Earth by GQ), ING (the only place I know of that has miracle berries), Blackbird (good, but overrated in my opinion), Kuma’s Corner (finest burgers on the planet, good beer selection, insanely loud death metal at all times), Hot Doug’s (gourmet hot dogs served by the friendliest man in town), Belly Shack (Korean/Puerto Rican fusion fast food). I’m probably forgetting a lot.[/quote]
    I would add Moto and Ria. But you did a good job covering most of the great ones.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  209. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=dylanj]i always figured you for a Hot Carl kind of guy[/quote]Washed down with a Flaming Moe.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment