Cubs Come Away From Uneventful Winter Meetings with Ian Stewart and Nate Schierholtz

In Commentary And Analysis, Transactions by berselius47 Comments

The Cubs big moves during the winter meetings were to sign two players that were non-tendered by their teams a week ago. This is a year!

The Cubs signed former Giants OF Nate Schierholtz to a one year, $2.25m deal plus incentives. He's an above-average defender, but has posted a .270/.319/.409 line over the past six seasons. Granted, a lot of that was in SF but that's pretty not good. He's penciled in as the starting RF, but he's not going to block the Cubs from acquiring someone if something better comes along. The funniest thing about the Schierholtz signing was Yankees fans/media saying that they "missed out" on him to be Nick Swisher's replacement. I don't even. Schierholtz is barely a starter on this sorry squad. 

Given the complete lack of non-Youkilis options out there, the Cubs re-signed Ian Stewart to a one-year, $2m non-guaranteed deal with $500k in incentives. At least Stewart is the youngest of all the free agent 3b out there. Given how long I stuck with thinking Randy Wells was worth a damn, I'm okay with this deal. Aside from Youkilis, look at the other "top" FA third basemen who were out there

Youkilis is the only credible option out there, and has recieved several offers from other teams. Still, despite the bidding war one of the relatively credible offers was for 1/12. So not much. 

Stewart's offer is guaranteed, so there's still a chance the Cubs could get someone else via trade. Or maybe Josh Vitters will be Transformed or something. You never know.

 

 

Share this Post

Comments

  1. GBTS

    Chone Figgins ā€“ posted wOBA of .220 and .242 the past two seasons
    Jose Lopez ā€“ Lost his job to Chone Figgins

    (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. josh

    @ Suburban kid:
    I just took it as standard beat writer lingo, but maybe there’s a story there.

    So the Cubs are looking to suck at approximately the same level as last year, if I’m reading these signings correctly.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. Aisle424

    josh wrote:

    So the Cubs are looking to suck at approximately the same level as last year, if Iā€™m reading these signings correctly.

    I’m telling you, it’s going to be worse. They won’t be as good as they were to start the season last year and they’ll deal away anybody who is any good not named Rizzo or Castro.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. Suburban kid

    josh wrote:

    I just took it as standard beat writer lingo, but maybe thereā€™s a story there.

    I don’t think so. The Yellon vibe is strong with this one, but I could be wrong. It just seems like every stupid saying on OV can be traced back there.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. josh

    @ Aisle424:
    What if they resign Ginger Funnyman Harry-Carray Impressions? Then they’ll be right on track for 102 losses.

    Seriously, there is zilch going on with this team. Draft day will be the only time it’ll be worth tuning in.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. JonKneeV

    Suburban kid wrote:

    @ Aisle424:
    I keep waiting for the new OV article headlined ā€œHow Much Ass Will the Cubs Suck in 2013?ā€

    When is that one going to be posted?

    THIS MUCH ASS

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. josh

    @ WaLi:
    I may tune into the Jays until the make their inevitable decline, but even that’s no guarantee. I find baseball to be kind of boring when I don’t care about the team.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment