Cubs have not signed Starlin Castro to 7-year extension ***UPDATED***

In News And Rumors, Transactions by dmick8939 Comments

According to Enrique Rojas of ESPN the Cubs have signed Starlin Castro to a 7-year extension worth $60 million.

Starlin Castro has agreed to a seven-year, $60 million contract extension with the Chicago Cubs, a source close to the star shortstop told ESPNdeportesLosAngeles.com.

The contract covers four years of arbitration eligibility and three years of free agency, and includes a $16 million option for 2020. Castro, 22, was projected to qualify for salary arbitration as a "Super Two" player at the end of the year.

More to come, but this is in line with what we expected based on comparable players.

UPDATE: There's an 8th year option for $16 million, which could bring the total value of the contract up to $76 million over 8 years. Over the last few days we found that Castro's projected value made him worth about $58 million over 6 years while comparable players was under $10 million per year. The average annual value of this 7-year contract is $8.57 million.

I added this bit in the post the other day:

We shouldn't see a contract extension for Castro equal those two either. It should be closer to Jose Reyes' extension with a couple more years added on and a small increase in inflation. Say something like 6 years and $48 million. That's below the other two contracts and more overall money than Reyes got, but probably somewhat similar in reality. Castro is similar to Reyes in terms of performance and not at all similar to Hanley and Tulo. So why pay him like he's one of those two?

This is a fine contract for the Cubs. They got the 7th year here, which is a bit surprising and they paid a bit more for it, but overall this is a very good contract for the Cubs.

UPDATE 2: Theo Epstein says that no extension has been finalized.

A deal is done. No it isn't. We've seen this before.

UPDATE 3: Jon Heyman says on twitter that a $1 million buyout is part of the $60 million.

Share this Post

Comments

  1. Rizzo the Rat

    I enjoyed watching the Cubs tag Chapman for a run (he hadn’t allowed a run in 22 innings). Brenly was very angry at Welington for not running on his hit (he should have made it to second).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. SVB

    Would suggesting that a certain soon-to-be-extended someone’s next hit in the game could produce a Natural Cycle jinx it?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. Berselius

    You can tell that the extension isn’t final yet from Castro’s performance. Once that money is in the bank he’ll be taking siestas in the batters box

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. Rizzo the Rat

    Aramis leads the league in extra-base hits. The Cubs’ third basemen can’t compete offensively, of course, but I’m sure they more than make up for it with defense and hustle.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. Rizzo the Rat

    @ josh:
    Oh, I definitely wouldn’t argue that the Cubs should have re-signed him. But watching Cubs third-basemen go .211/.288/.348 while Aramis continues doing Aramis things makes one appreciate him more (or at least it should).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. josh

    I’m not a religious man at all (AT ALL), but everytime I listen to the WGN radio intro and hear Harry say “What a lucky break! The Good Lord wants the Cubs to win!” I get that I’m-getting-struck-by-lightening feeling in my gut.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment