•   Follow us
  •   Become a fan
  •   Contact
  •   RSS
  • The Cubs will probably avoid losing 100 games

    The Cubs currently sit at 58-89 even though 2 weeks ago it looked like a sure thing that they would lose 100. But after the Cubs have won 7 of their last 11 games it's now looking unlikely.

    Baseball Prospectus has the Cubs going 6-9 over the rest of the season which would put them at a cool 64-98 on the season. That would be the worst record this team has had since 1980 when they were also 64-98. That's the only time in the divisional era of MLB in which the Cubs have lost that many games.

    There have actually only been two seasons in which they've lost more than 98. The '62 and '66 teams each lost 103 games. Interestingly, the '62 team didn't even finish in last place in the National League. They finished in 9th. This year they won't finish in last even though it's one of the top 5 worst seasons in franchise history. They won't even be close to last.

    If the season was called off right this moment, this team would finish having the 22nd worst season in franchise history. The Cubs have started a season 0-14 so maybe they can finish the season 0-14 at which point they would be tied with the two clubs in the 60s for the most franchise losses.

    Baseball Reference is quite handy. You can sort the team's records any which you want and they include a column for the top player (player with the most rWAR). Horrible teams like the '66 Cubs don't often have an MVP type player, but Ron Santo's rWAR in 1966 was 8.7. That's the 17th highest single season total for a Cub in history. That team lost 103 games.

    Thanks to Darwin Barney's absure +27 DRS, he currently has 4.7 rWAR. Starlin Castro is closest among the hitters at 2.7 so even if you adjusted Barney's defensive metric down to a more believable 10 or 12 runs saved, he would still have the most rWAR among Cubs position players. You could lower his DRS to +7 and he'd be tied with Castro at 2.7 rWAR.

    If you include pitchers, Ryan Dempster had 3.5 rWAR with the Cubs and after him is Jeff Samardzija at 1.9.

    This says nothing about Barney's ability to play because he is a good ballplayer, but when he's your most productive player you're probably not going to be contending, but at least they're not likely to lose 100 games anymore. They've got that going for them.

    dmick89
    When I awoke, the Dire Wolf, six hundred pounds of sin, Was grinning at my window, all I said was "Come on in"
    dmick89
    dmick89
    Contact me here

    22 Responses to “The Cubs will probably avoid losing 100 games”

    1. Rice Cube 1 Rice Cube says:

      58-59 would be preferable to what it actually is (dying laughing)

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    2. mb21 2 mb21 says:

      fixed

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    3. josh 4 josh says:

      I feel like I should be booing this title.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    4. josh 5 josh says:

      Wait, what’s all this Darwin Barney talk? I thought Soriano was an MVP candidate?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    5. Rice Cube 7 Rice Cube says:

      @ josh:
      I think it’s boo-worthy if the Cubs lose the #2 pick.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    6. Mish 9 Mish says:

      @ mb21:
      The only times I read a fangraphs article is if A) someone says it worthwhile or B) the headline catches my eye, usually by refering to a player I care about (Rizzo, Castro, Longoria, Trout) or a team (Cubs, Rays). But even then I usually just scan the article. I still have Fangraphs on my RSS feed so I can browse through what’s posted.

      I still go their first for stats, though. I’m more of wOBA/wRC+ guy as is.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    7. Rice Cube 10 Rice Cube says:

      Your responsive mobile theme is nice. The comment numbers are showing up as well.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    8. mb21 11 mb21 says:

      @ Rice Cube:
      It’s just the same theme and it’s set so the content displays first.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    9. mb21 12 mb21 says:

      Mish wrote:

      I still go their first for stats, though. I’m more of wOBA/wRC+ guy as is.

      Same here, but I go to BRef just as much. I don’t look at one stat page without looking at the other. If I want quick stats and don’t care about going both places I go to BRef.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    10. Rice Cube 13 Rice Cube says:

      What do the projection systems say about the other teams (I.e. Colorado) vying.for the #2 pick?

      I kind of want the Cubs to have a winning record at home but this next stretch against the Reds and Cards could help with separation assuming the Rockies can win a couple.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    11. josh 15 josh says:

      I love the picture you chose for this article, by the way.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    12. WaLi 16 WaLi says:




      Download | Convert YouTube to MP3


      (dying laughing) @ 50:43

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    13. josh 17 josh says:

      @ WaLi:
      Ow! Jerry totally grabbed the pan with his bare hand.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    14. mb21 18 mb21 says:

      @ Rice Cube:
      PECOTA says 7-9 the rest of the way so if the Cubs go 6-9 then the Cubs beat the Rockies by a game for the 2nd pick.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    15. josh 19 josh says:

      And it was his fret hand.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    16. Suburban kid 20 Suburban kid says:

      @ Mercurial Outfielder:
      Look! Johnny Macchione is all growed up!

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    17. josh 21 josh says:

      (dying laughing), just reliving the Carl Crawford experience after accidentally clicking on him (was looking up Brandon Crawford). I wonder if he’ll ever actually play a game for the Dodgers.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    Leave a Reply

    RSS Obstructed View Forum