Blake DeWitt DFA’d

In Commentary And Analysis, News And Rumors, Transactions by dmick8962 Comments

The Cubs have DFA'd Blake DeWitt and re-caled Travis Wood who will start today against the Dodgers. I don't believe Berselius published a projection for Wood, but Oliver did project him to be worth 2.5 WAR at the time the Cubs traded Sean Marshall for him.

Wood has had mixed results so far at Iowa. He has struckout over 9 per 9 innings and his walk rate is below 3. Both of those are excellent. His ERA is higher than 5, but his FIP is 3.87. The ERA is not so good, but the FIP is pretty good. His BABIP is nearly .400 so I'm reluctant to put much weight into his ERA.

Marcel, ZiPS and Bill James all projected Wood to have an FIP under 4 this season. Travis Wood will face former Red Aaron Harang today at 1:20.

Share this Post

Comments

  3. Suburban kid

    What’s the status? Surely someone here follows Judd Sirott or Carrie Muskat on twitter.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. mb21

    @ josh:
    Because the Cubs (and most MLB teams for that matter) don’t really understand that a player is already in scoring position at 2nd base. It’s quite odd.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. ACT

    @ mb21:
    I don’t have a problem with stealing third as such, but he did a terrible job at it. You shouldn’t steal third unless you get a great lead/jump. I don’t like the “he’s already in scoring position” argument, though. His chances of scoring would have greatly increased if he were safe.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. ACT

    RYAN DEMPSTER HAS THE BEST ERA AMONG QUALIFIED STARTERS IN ALL OF BASEBALL AND CHRIS DAVIS HAS MORE WINS THAN HE DOES— Not Buster Olney (@TrippingOlney) May 7, 2012

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  37. mb21

    The funniest thing about the MGL/Dolis thing is that MGL is more than likely right in that Dolis has no business being a big league closer. Any other reliever on the roster is better at baseball than Dolis. There is probably at least 1 position player better than Dolis. We’re talking about a guy who had a 6.5 K/9 in A+ and AA and walked nearly 4.5. Only 17.2 big league innings, but he actually has walked nearly twice as many batters as he’s struck out. I’m going to go out on a limb and say that pitchers who have a .5 K/BB ratio in their first 18 innings haven’t stuck around in MLB too long. Just a hunch.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  41. SkipVB

    Just thought I’d nitpick the FIPer link that MB posted the other day.

    Correlation of stat with itself for the next year (left) and with next year's ERA (right)

    As you can see, FIPer shows a considerably higher Y2Y correlation than FIP

    .
    Well, 0.09, which is better. Not sure if it is considerable or not.

    Similarly, xFIPer shows improvement over of xFIP.

    0.14. If nothing else, this is more “considerably higher” than FIPer vs FIP.

    This means that a player’s FIPer and xFIPer are more stable over time than his FIP and xFIP, respectively, consistent with the metrics being a better representation of the true talent level. FIPer also shows a stronger Y2Y correlation than FIP with ERA, meaning that it better predicts the following year’s ERA.

    0.03 We are getting to the point where the difference in the correlations are very hard to determine whether they are meaningful or not. How many HR’s in the data have to change for this difference to vanish?

    In fact, for this particular data set, FIPer outperformed all the other metrics in the study, with xFIPer placing second.

    …by 0.01. Considering all the advanced stats have coefficients between 0.43 and 0.49, I’d say they are all pretty equal. But the bigger question is if ERA is such a lousy stat, why bother trying to correlate to it? If a lousy stat is the benchmark, why try to predict it, rather than throw it out? If I have an old can of Shaeffer beer sitting in the sun for a few weeks, I’m not going to drink PBR, Blatz, Falstaff, Natural Light, Hamm’s and Genesee Cream trying to figure out which one tastes just as bad.

    One other question about trying to eliminate IP from the FIP equation. Assume a slow pitcher that lulls his defense to sleep (say Steve Trachsel) vs someone that works quickly and keeps his defense involved (say Greg Maddux). I guess that Maddux will compile more outs because the defense is more alert for him. He controls, in some sense, their performance, as does Trachsel, by the way they work. Shouldn’t the way a pitcher involves his defense, or is able to elicit a ground ball to 2b, for example, count for something?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  43. SkipVB

    Thanks for the server switch, MB, and others. I did notice some weird drags from time to time on updating and such. This site is too much fun to have it screwed up by a host.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  44. Rice Cube

    Congratulations on the server switch. May your new blog home be 2 or 288 times better than the old one.

    Also, did you guys notice that Len was discussing a modified version of the run expectancy chart during the broadcast? I thought that was cool.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  45. GW

    SkipVB wrote:

    But the bigger question is if ERA is such a lousy stat, why bother trying to correlate to it?

    well, fantasy baseball. but RA is just as noisy, and i’m sure you can see the benefits of correlating to that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  46. SkipVB

    @ GW:
    I like RA pretty well, better than fielding independent stats, because I think pitchers’ performance dictates at least a portion of defense–such as my Trachsel/Maddux example above. Opposite is true too. The original post about FIPer suggests sets up a team of Skip Schumachers as a straw man. If I were a pitcher on that team, I guess I’d want more fly balls and strike outs.

    I only play head to head fantasy on a weekly league, because that fits my schedule. It’s a non-keeper league, so I think we spend less time with some of the newer stats and care less about correlations for the next year.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  48. Mish

    KG

    Gerardo Concepcion, LHP, Cubs (Low-A Peoria)
    The Cubs rocked the scouting world when they signed Concepcion to a $6 million big league deal that included a $3 million bonus, and the 20-year-old Cuban has not exactly gotten off to a rollicking start. After allowing seven runs in one inning on Saturday, he now has an 18.90 ERA in three starts and the Midwest League is batting .514 (19-for-37) against him. That said, it’s not time to panic, as the money involved was the creation of end-of-market inflation, and not Concepcion’s talent. He throws strikes with an upper-80s fastball and has the potential for good secondaries, but as a command-and-control pitcher and not a stuff guy, it’s going to take time to figure out how to pitch, as well as to adjust to his new life in the United States. Patience, for now.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  51. Aisle424

    It is the first in a series. The next will be a little friendly reminder about the importance of good hosting for posts.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  53. WaLi

    Plus none of our pitchers had an out at the plate (Wood was 2-2 with a run scored, and Samardzija had a HBP). Take your DH and suck it MB (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  56. Mucker

    @ josh:
    When I saw the replay, I knew he broke his wrist. He came down with a lot of force on his wrist and the way it was bent back, I knew it was not good.

    Bryce Harper is fast as shit. I’ve watched pretty much all of his at bats so far and that kid can flat out fly. Just thought I’d add that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  62. Mucker

    @ josh:
    Yeah I saw that. Hamels said he hit him on purpose and Harper probably knew it.

    I don’t understand the hate for Harper. He’s only 19 and he gets booed and talked about relentlessly. If you listen to his interviews, he shows a lot of respect for the game and his opponents. To me, he just seems like a really intense competitor. But it seems like everything he does, the media or fans are all over him about it. I guess haters gonna hate. Personally, I think it’s exciting to see somebody so young making an impact.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment