A Winning Pitch (We Hope)

In Commentary And Analysis by Rice Cube52 Comments

We’ve reached the phase right before Spring Training where it’s mostly claims and minor league contracts while the residue of the free agent barrel lingers until teams and agents finally settle on something. For all intents and purposes, the roster is set (very similar to what we did last time, minus some DFAs and outrights and what not) and the only real questions are at the margins. For example:

  1. Who will be the backend starter(s), especially if Kyle Hendricks isn’t going to be ready for Opening Day, or ever?
  2. Who gets the last couple bullpen spots?
  3. Who is the pitching depth ready to be called up in case of injury/ineffectiveness/Act of God?

We will stick with the pitching theme for this post, as we determine which 13 guys likely get listed on the lineup card come Opening Day, and who their backups are on the taxi squad if a call-up is warranted.

The Rotation

Based purely on gut and the fact that he basically pitched like we thought he would by the end of the season, it seems pretty clear that Marcus Stroman, barring any setbacks, will be the Cubs’ Opening Day starter. I will list the five guys (not the burgers) I believe will be in the rotation on day one, and we can look at taxi squad spot starters later.

  1. Marcus Stroman
  2. Jameson Taillon
  3. Justin Steele
  4. Drew Smyly
  5. TBD (Hayden Wesneski or Adrian Sampson as the placeholder)

I think the top three are likely set in stone, and I also don’t think the Cubs sign Drew Smyly just to throw him in the bullpen, so that makes sense as a top four, with David Ross potentially switching guys around to alternate handedness within a series.

I say “TBD” for the number five spot because while it makes sense that it should be Hayden Wesneski (and again it’s not Hendricks simply because he is rehabbing, otherwise I think they let him start the year on the active roster as a courtesy and also because he can’t be outrighted without permission), I can see a situation where they keep Wesneski stretched out on a regular rotation in Iowa while someone like Adrian Sampson shows what he did last year wasn’t a fluke. We might also see Keegan Thompson in this spot, but I think he worked better in the bullpen as a long reliever than as a starter. So if Wesneski gets this spot, that completes the rotation, but if he doesn’t, he’s in Iowa as he has options remaining (see AZ Phil’s chart for the others as I refer to them later on in this post).

I do like that with this rotation, they generally induce plenty of groundballs and keep the ball in the park, which plays to the defense that the Cubs have assembled, particularly with the shift restrictions. Having Gold Glove-caliber defenders up the middle should help the rotation keep the runs against numbers down, and since few of these guys have blow-you-away stuff, inducing grounders and converting them into outs should help them stick around into the sixth or seventh innings more often.

The Bullpen

We get eight spots in the bullpen assuming a five-man rotation, at least until September or in doubleheaders where they get an extra guy. No more LOOGYs because of the three-batter minimum, so these guys have to be able to sustain at least to the end of their inning. Here’s a list of the eight-ish guys, with no regard as to their actual role in the order they are presented.

  1. Adbert Alzolay
    • Adbert has no options remaining so this is his year to prove himself before he is arbitration eligible. Adbert has thrived in a relief role where before he was kind of a meh starter, so this makes sense for him.
  2. Brad Boxberger
    • He’s one of the free agent signings this offseason and they’re going to give him plenty of runway to show what he has left in the tank, which if he can pitch as well as he did last year, is quite a bit. Boxberger’s deal was relatively inexpensive so this is probably one of the spots that can go to an internal option if the Cubs are forced to cut bait, which is obviously not ideal so let’s not deal with that.
  3. Brandon Hughes
    • The Cubs have a paucity of capable left-handed relief options, so this is pretty much a lock for Hughes, who did very well as Grandpa Rossy’s primary (and often only) lefty guy. Which probably means the Cubs should sign another lefty, so keep reading.
  4. Michael Rucker
    • Depending on whether he eventually gets DFA for another signing (see below), Rucker does have options remaining so this spot is probably in flux.
  5. Keegan Thompson
    • Thompson was one of the more reliable long relief guys after he made the full transition to the bullpen, but he might be able to function in a piggyback capacity with another bullpen guy (probably Adbert) if necessary.
  6. Rowan Wick
    • If Wick regains a form that we saw just a couple seasons back, then he likely finishes the season in the bullpen. If not, he does have one option year remaining.
  7. Jeremiah Estrada or Adrian Sampson
    • Estrada pitched a few times at the tail end of the season and struck out a third of the batters he faced. Sampson made a number of starts that were, shall we say, shrouded in mystery because based on his repertoire he probably shouldn’t have gotten the results he did, but the results are the results. Both have options remaining so this spot is also fluid.
  8. Insert free agent LHP here
    • There are a few lefty relievers still waiting to find a new home, including former Cub Andrew Chafin, whom I think the Cubs should prioritize if they do want to try. The Cubs have already outrighted Anthony Kay so it would seem kind of goofy if they had to put him back on the roster, at which point they would no longer be able to outright him without permission. I think this is a free agent signing because aside from Hughes, there are no other left-handed obvious relief guys on the 40-man roster and that doesn’t include the lefty starters in Steele and Smyly.

The Taxi Squad

This represents everyone who is currently on the 40-man roster, who still have options remaining and/or the Cubs don’t care if they bail after a DFA, and who hopefully won’t suck (in this guy’s opinion anyway). Keep in mind that the maximum number of times a guy can be yo-yo’d back and forth between the minors and MLB is five, and that pitcher must stay in the minors for at least 15 days (except in case of injury replacement), so they’ll have to be creative with reliever usage and phantom IL stints. This won’t include the ones I’ve mentioned above already.

  • Javier Assad
    • A late-season starter, Assad had some success in his role although at times I thought he was inefficient, didn’t necessarily show off anything magical, and might have gotten away with some good luck. But he is still on the roster for a reason, as even a guy like this who can eat some innings without being shelled can be valuable.
  • Ben Brown
    • The return in the David Robertson trade, Ben Brown was protected from the Rule 5 draft and seems to be one of the potential call-ups should a spot start be needed.
  • Codi Heuer and Ethan Roberts
    • Still recovering from Tommy John surgery, Heuer figures to be a bullpen boost once he is healthy midseason. Similarly, Roberts was doing well until his own injury and hopefully regains that form when he fully recovers.
  • Ryan Jensen
    • Jensen was also protected from Rule 5 despite not having pitched above Double-A. I only list him because he’s on the roster and might be someone the Cubs want to look at come September.
  • Kyle Hendricks
    • I wouldn’t count on Hendricks doing much this year due to his recovery from a shoulder injury, but we’ll see what happens.
  • Caleb Kilian
    • I feel like Kilian stays in Iowa to figure out his command issues for a bit before they give him another shot, but I do expect to see him in Wrigley at some point assuming he does figure it out, because the stuff is filthy if he knows where it is supposed to go.
  • Julian Merryweather and Anthony Kay
    • Lumping these guys together because I think they try to outright Merryweather prior to DFAing Rucker or whoever else to accommodate whoever else they decide to sign, but Merryweather has a live arm and just needs to figure out how to make that fastball work for him and not get consistently destroyed. Kay just got outrighted so they could keep him in the organization, so I expect to see him get a shot later on in the year if he shows out.

That represents all the names on the 40-man, and we haven’t covered the guys who are lurking in Iowa. Most of the Iowa roster, as it stands, is filler and former top picks like Brendon Little, along with a bunch of reclamation projects, so there might be some diamonds down on that part of the farm without having to raid Tennessee just yet.

I would be interested to know your list of 13, but we’re still a few weeks from Spring Training, so maybe we will take a wait-and-see approach. Although this pitching staff is probably not as sexy as some others, I imagine they’ll at least be competent, so hooray for the plan!

Share this Post

Comments

  1. Author
    Rice Cube

    andcounting: I’m not going to judge anybody by their ability to ditch their habits, but the ability /demand to relay news as soon as it breaks is both the strength and pitfall of twitter.And the big difference between Musk and Ricketts as it relates to their respective ownership is that the Ricketts ultimately have a desired end in common with me (we both are interested to various degrees in seeing the Cubs win it all) whereas I don’t think Musk has a desired outcome for Twitter that intersects at all with what I’d want it to be. And, all morals/ethics aside, he owns it. Even if he desired it to be something distinct from what I wanted my preferred social medium to be but still benign or beneficial to the greater good, I’d have ample reason to leave it because I could reasonably predict it changing into something I didn’t enjoy using. As it is, it’s objectionable to me on every level.

    I’ve also seen the quality of my relationships on their deteriorate quite a bit much by my own doing, so it’s an easier break for me.

    No judgment on my part, the social media experience is different for everyone, for myself it’s because I still have enough self-control and overall control of whom I follow and want to see, but the moment that changes I think I’ll scale back similarly to how I’m just not on other networks quite as much. I think for many people they have had to deal with horrible experiences, which explains the exodus (Mastodon is ok but it’s super weird too so I haven’t been able to get into it even if I maintain an account) and the precipitous drop in ad revenue. I think I just stay there to see where all the cool people I follow end up going afterwards and then I’ll head there.

      Quote  Reply

    1

    0
  2. Author
    Rice Cube

    As if on cue:

    https://www.bleachernation.com/cubs/2023/01/26/the-chicago-cubs-arent-done-yet-making-moves/

    Looking at MLBTR list, the folks I might be interested in were I smarter and running the team:

    https://www.mlbtraderumors.com/2022/12/2022-23-mlb-free-agents.html

    Gary Sanchez (probably too expensive and not sure how good of a catcher he is anyway plus the Cubs already have too many random guys who can stand at 1B, but that bat seems like it could rebound)

    Donovan Solano (I feel like he would work in matchup situations but then again that’s why Patrick Wisdom exists)

    Jurickson Profar (but where would he even play since he’s primarily OF? I don’t think he’s been in the infield since two years ago)

    Zack Greinke (he probably goes back to the Royals but this would be so fun)

    Any of the LHPs I mentioned, particularly Chafin, Matt Moore, and possibly Will Smith as long as you keep his wife’s name out yo mouth

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. andcounting

    I think the Cubs have a better shot at treading water/winning lucky the first half of the season and making a big move at the deadline than finding a difference maker shopping for deck chairs at this point. I mean, they might make another move or two (I can see them getting Chafin) I’ve just stopped caring. Enough of front office games, let’s play ball.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. Author
    Rice Cube

    Interesting take from Cory Wade:

    Cory Wade
    10:31 Im not a big fan of the data obsession of the game. I think it has slowed the game down and doesnt always allow the players show off their underrated athleticism. I think the data has eliminated many aspects of the game like stealing bases and the hit/run out of fear of running into outs. Eliminating those things makes it easier to pitch to I dont have to worry about much bc no one is moving around behind me trying to take bases. I would love to see that stuff come back in the game but its beautiful to watch.

    I hope that the new rules at least try to rebalance the athleticism that we like to see in the game along with the analytics of “hit ball hard and far” and “miss bats”

    https://live.jotcast.com/chat/live-chat-with-former-mlb-pitcher-cory-wade-14866.html

      Quote  Reply

    1

    0
  5. andcounting

    He kinda introduces two different arguments: effective baseball isn’t always the most entertaining baseball, and does data steer us too far in the boring direction; and is a comfortable pitcher a better pitcher?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. Author
    Rice Cube

    Wondering about whether or not a WBC stint messes with Seiya Suzuki and the other Cubs who are also participating:

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. Author
    Rice Cube

    andcounting,

    I think the points are related, because boring baseball is when there’s not enough offense being generated, or the action is limited because you’re either hitting the ball over the wall or right at a guy who knows to stand there. That is also worsened by the pitchers throwing with more velocity and funk, especially if they have time to recover. I think the new rules try to combat that a bit by encouraging more basestealing, by reducing the amount of time between pitches that the pitcher can use to recover, and generally getting a few extra guys on base because their grounders actually got through. The reduction of recovery time means the pitcher probably has to take a bit off and can’t shake off as much, which might give the offensive players a bit more of a chance and directly generate more excitement via balls put into play. I like homers and strikeouts too, but gappers and athletic defensive plays are good too!

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. BVS

    andcounting,

    Rice Cube,

    This has been Theo’s point too right? Analytics have been effective, but funsucking.

    Not sure he said it like that though.

    Aside from the inability to simply swap the 2b and ss that I complained about a couple posts ago, I like the new rules.

      Quote  Reply

    2

    0
  9. Author
    Rice Cube

    BVS,

    Per Cub Reporter’s memo, yes –> https://www.thecubreporter.com/book/export/html/3538

    5. During Spring Training and during the MLB regular season up through August 31st, an injured or ill player can be placed on or transferred to the MLB 60-day Injured List only if his club’s reserve list is full, but if a player is placed on or transferred to the MLB 60-day Injured List after August 31st, the club’s reserve list must be full – AND – the player must be replaced on his club’s MLB Reserve List (40-man roster) by another player.

    8. A player cannot be placed on the MLB 60-day IL after the conclusion of the MLB regular season, and during the post-season and off-season, up until the start of Spring Training (beginning on the date that pitchers & catchers are scheduled to report). A minor league player can be placed on a minor league club’s 60-day Injured List only during his minor league club’s regular season.

    10. A player who is placed on the MLB 60-day Injured List during Spring Training must spend at least the first 60 days of the MLB regular season on the Injured List (the player cannot be reinstated any earlier than the 61st day of the MLB regular season).

    Keep in mind that this is from AZ Phil’s document from a decade ago but I don’t think the rules have changed much particularly if MLB.com’s glossary page doesn’t even touch on any of this, figure they would have mentioned something had anything changed.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. Author
    Rice Cube

    Rice Cube,

    Actually I guess he keeps the same document updated so if anything had changed we would have seen it updated in said document. I assumed you meant the 60-day IL since the Cubs need to clear out some spots in case of random additions, which may comport with what Bryan at BN was saying re: certain pitchers (i.e. a Chafin) waiting to sign until that spot could be cleared with the 60-day IL move.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. Perkins

    I wouldn’t even be that annoyed about analytics optimizing for 3TO if it meant we’d get more crazy high strikeout games, but we’ve only had two with 18 or higher (from a starter) since 2015 because managers have gotten a lot more cognizant of the third time through the order penalty.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. Author
    Rice Cube

    Perkins,

    We won’t know until this plays out, but I figure the pitch clock potentially reducing max-effort deliveries and more pitch-to-contact type pitching to keep guys fresher longer into the game might get more starters through to the later innings when they finally decide to empty the tank and maybe that also negates some of the 3TO penalties because suddenly it’s like “oh shit he’s bringing it now” if he makes it that far. The profiles of what the Cubs have right now is more inducing ground balls and managing contact than strike everyone out, anyway, so maybe that was part of the plan all along.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. BVS

    Rice Cube: I assumed you meant the 60-day IL since the Cubs need to clear out some spots in case of random additions,

    Yup.

    Heuer and Hendricks can go on right away. That makes 2 spots for relievers or one reliever and a legit bench bat.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. Perkins

    Rice Cube,

    I remember that being one of the hallmarks of early to mid-career Verlander. He’d get through the order a couple times before dialing it up to 98 later in the game. So much fun to watch.

      Quote  Reply

    1

    0
  15. Author
    Rice Cube

    BVS,

    I think it’ll be the two TJS guys in Heuer and Roberts, Hendricks they might backdate because they want to see his progress during the spring rehab first, but you’re right that there are at least two spots that should be available for use. If they think they can sneak Merryweather through waivers for the outright then they can even delay those decisions until later.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. Author
    Rice Cube

    Perkins,

    The way I think about it, if 100 normal, thoughtful pitches can get you through seven innings where 100 max-effort pitches only gets you through 5, I think you take the former just to save wear on the bullpen particularly with the roster and option restrictions now. Also makes sense to protect your pitchers.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. BVS

    Exerpt from mlbtr obit on Gary Peters ( not the Senator from Michigan):

    in 1963 … He tossed 243 innings … over 30 starts and 11 relief appearances, posting a tidy 2.33 ERA that led the American League. He was …the AL Rookie of the Year… The southpaw built on that campaign with another strong one in 1964. He made 36 starts and one relief appearance, logging 273 2/3 innings with a 2.50 ERA. His 20 wins were tops in the American League…. 79 complete games in his career.

    Don’t think the shift and pitch clock will bring back these types of numbers. Wow.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. Perkins

    BVS,

    I wasn’t around for the days of the four man rotation, but those type of numbers look like a product of it. That’d be cool to watch.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. Author
    Rice Cube

    Perkins,

    It seems back then most players would “tough out” any nagging pains or actual injuries, and also most of them didn’t throw 95+ so that probably helped some. I think today’s players are more cognizant of how important their health is and will report even minor aches and pains, and organizations want to maximize performance and protect their investments. Which makes you wonder just how valuable a guy who can give you 180 innings over about 30-35 starts in the season is, but apparently it’s very valuable and as always I prefer the player get paid than the team just hoarding money.

      Quote  Reply

    1

    0
  20. Author
    Rice Cube

    The name is familiar:

    Ah, this guy –> https://www.baseball-reference.com/players/d/duffety01.shtml
    Seems worthwhile, too bad he’s not left-handed though.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. Perkins

    Rice Cube,

    I often wonder (but haven’t analyzed too thoroughly) the impact of survivor bias on how we perceive older generations of players. Everyone remembers Bob Gibson and Tom Seaver, but I bet there are a couple dozen guys who flamed out after a couple years for every one who consistently hit 250 innings.

      Quote  Reply

    1

    0
  22. Author
    Rice Cube

    Perkins,

    I’m gonna guess that the “workhorses” we know about are impossible standards to live by because they got by on some mutant UCLs and pure luck that they didn’t get injured more than whatever they might have been able to hide. Which is similar to how lots of fans get pissed because an otherwise solid player isn’t hitting like Mike Schmidt all the time (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. Author
    Rice Cube

    Is there something significant about today that all these signings and extensions are being announced?

    Today, coincidentally, is International Holocaust Remembrance Day, and it most likely is unrelated (I hope)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. Author
    Rice Cube

    Rice Cube,

    Oh wait, they start arbitration hearings on Monday, so that’s probably it.

    My sympathies to those who may have lost family in the Holocaust and my admiration to the survivors who continue to tell the story to drown out the deniers.

      Quote  Reply

    1

    0
  25. BVS

    Rice Cube,

    DeJesus was my favorite player when I was a kid. Maybe because I my Granddad could only pronounce his name as in English, so it was funny, and because Grampa appreciated good D.

    Rick Reuschel was on the Cubs about that time too and Gramma was always disgusted when they put “Hamburger” in. Guess she thought he cut too much of a softball figure.

    Of course, it didn’t take us too long to get over losing DeJesus, but I did still check his name in the box scores in the paper.

      Quote  Reply

    2

    0
  26. andcounting

    BVS,

    My very first Cubs-induced emotional wound was inflicted by the news of that trade. “WHAT?!?! THEY TRADED DE JEEZUS?!?!” I exclaimed. His name had up to that point been my only source of entertainment from watching baseball (aside from the animated cub/bear that accompanied the “The Cubs are coming out of hiiiiiibernation” jingle).

      Quote  Reply

    1

    0
  27. Perkins

    Letting Maddux go was my first really sad Cubs moment, but I was fortunately too young to comprehend its enormity. The next one was 2003.

      Quote  Reply

    2

    0
  28. andcounting

    Perkins,

    That one was definitely rough. The first really deep wound for me was ‘84. Losing game 5 broke me (I was 9). I can’t talk about that experience out loud without at least starting to cry. Same with 2016 game 7 but for different reasons.

      Quote  Reply

    2

    0
  29. Perkins

    Rice Cube,

    I’ve watched NLDS game 5 from 2003 a few times over the years and that’s a happy memory. I just like to forget there was another series that followed it.

      Quote  Reply

    1

    0
  30. BVS

    andcounting,

    If you were an Indiana boy back then, it’s too bad you didn’t live next to my Grandparents so you could listen to Gramma cuss about Hamburger Rueschel is a proper Methodist way. That would’ve added to the DeeJeezis joy.

      Quote  Reply

    1

    0

Leave a Comment