2012 Cubs Catching Defense

In Commentary And Analysis by dmick89130 Comments

One of the things I noticed this season with Welington Castillo was that about any time he had an opportunity to make an error, he did. I'm not being serious of course, but it was pretty bad. Only 6 catchers made more errors than Castillo and he only caught 413.2 innings. It also seemed he allowed a lot of passed balls and wild pitches though when I looked that up toward the end of the season it was an example of my eyes telling me something that wasn't there.

Each year Matt Klassen has been measuring catcher defense for at least the last few years. It seems like longer than that and may actually be, but I'm not sure. The 2012 numbers are out now and they do show that not only was Castillo a poor fielding catcher, but so was most of the other Cubs catchers.

Only Koyie Hill (+0.9 runs) and Anthony Recker (+0.7) were above average. Blake Lalli was at -0.6 so he was close enough. The other three, Geovany Soto, Steve Clevenger and Castillo were terrible.

Out of 116 catchers, Castillo ranked 104th at -3.1 runs. He was behind the plate for 1828 plate appearances. Soto ranked 106th at -3.4 (1911 PA) and Clevenger ranked 109th at -4.0 runs (1786 PA). Oddly enough, Soto was actually very good with the Rangers. Overall he'd have ranked around 90th.

Soto, Castillo and Clevenger each caught roughly the same amount of time and were by ard far the majority of the season behind the plate for the Cubs. Those three totaled -10.5 runs.

Klassen's numbers don't include pitch framing or game calling, which is very difficult to calculate. It's possible that Castillo and Clevenger excel in these areas, but we wouldn't really know. It's more likely they're average at best and overall below average defensive catchers. Clevenger is a very poor hitter and considering his defense has little ot no value.

This actually surprises me a bit. His numbers were slightly better than Castillo's in the minor leagues and he has the platoon advantage at the plate more frequenly than Castillo. This isn't to say Castillo is an impressive offensive catcher. He's league average at best.

The Cubs don't have to spend much money behind the plate with these two, but it's worth wondering how much they could improve if they did spend a little bit. The free agent catchers don't offer a whole lot, but one might be available in a trade.

Share this Post

Comments

  1. mb21

    @ josh:
    Just what I was thinking.

    As much as I’d enjoy the Nationals losing this series because of their stupidity of shutting Strasburg down, I’m sick of the Cardinals winning shit they don’t deserve to win.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. josh

    I don’t really give a shit about the Reds or the Giants, but I’m rooting for the Underdog as much as possible. Except for being 2 games down, I’m unclear which of these teams constitutes the “underdog.” Ergo, go Giants, I guess.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. mb21

    There could be some rule that if you replace a guy you cannot have him in the next round. I don’t know. It’s weird. My pick for the Reds winning it all doesn’t look too good right now.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. uncle dave

    mb21 wrote:

    There could be some rule that if you replace a guy you cannot have him in the next round. I don’t know. It’s weird. My pick for the Reds winning it all doesn’t look too good right now.

    That would make some sense — if you didn’t have that provision, you could just kick your starting pitchers off the roster in favor of another hitter or bullpen arm once you got to game 5 or 6. Not sure what the actual rule is at this point, though. It kind of seems like they didn’t completely think through the process of adding an extra wild card game or something (surprisingly).

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. uncle dave

    mb21 wrote:

    @ josh:
    I’m sick of the Cardinals winning shit they don’t deserve to win.

    So last night I’m walking across the bridge from the ballpark to BART after the A’s game and some guy is selling 2006 AL West champs gear, which I guess begs the question as to whether that was a new print run, or if the guy just had a box of six-year-old bootleg t-shirts he was hanging on to for a special occasion. Mostly, though, it just reminds me of how pissed off I am that the Cards got a World Series win in a year where they won all of 83 fucking games. Fuck.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. GBTS

    @ mb21:
    It still blows my mind there were actually people who advocated the Strasburg shutdown on the basis of “we need to preserve him for all our future playoff runs.”

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. GBTS

    I’m inclined to tell Nats fans to ask the 2003 Cubs how many playoff runs you are guaranteed to have by virtue of a dominant young pitching staff.

    But then I remember that team fell apart precisely because they couldn’t keep their dominant young pitchers on the field after an absurd workload the year before. So I just keep my mouth shut. And drink heavily. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. mb21

    Don’t you have to fire Rizzo and Johnson if the Nationals fail to win this series? I’d fire them both even if they won it all, but I don’t see how you keep either of them around if they don’t win this series.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. mikeakaleroy

    @ mb21:
    I don’t know…By shutting Strasburg down early to push for the future, you’d think you’d want some stability…On the other hand, it was dumb to shut him down.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  10. mb21

    @ uncle dave:
    Or like last year. 2006 bothered me less because I thought the Cardinals were the best team in baseball in both 2004 and 2005 and didn’t win a championship. Also, my grandpa was alive and he was a huge Cardinals fan so I was glad he got to see the win one final time. Now it’s just getting ridiculous.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  11. akabari

    At least what I’ve seen of this game so far, no amount of Strausburg would make up for the Nats complete lack of patience at the plate though.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  12. mb21

    @ mikeakaleroy:
    I’m even OK with an innings limit though I think it’s something you have to be willing to adjust to at any time. The problem with what the Nationals did was that they didn’t skip any starts, started him all season long and then shut him down before the playoffs. That’s horrible roster management. If there is an innings limit, you absolutely have to play with October in mind even if you’re as bad as the Cubs. You never know what can happen and early in the season there’s no reason not to skip a start here and there, pull him after 5 and so on and so forth. The fact they didn’t is unbelievable.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  13. mb21

    @ GBTS:
    I know. See Cubs, 1946-present. You don’t fuck around when you have a chance to win it all. You go for it. Have Strasburg start the season a month late. Have him actually pitch because, well, because there’s no evidence to suggest that too many innings at his age is going to have that much of an impact on his future. Furthermore, why do the Nationals give a fuck what Strasburg is like at the age of 30? Is he signed a 15 year contract or something?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  14. mikeakaleroy

    @ mb21:
    I agree with that…Skip a start here and there, or limit innings would be fine. I’ve also read some folk say they should have held him out the first month of the season, but at one point I ran the numbers and they won like 4 of the games he started to start the season, which that early on, would have dropped them into last instead of first to start the year.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  15. mb21

    @ akabari:
    They look terrible and it’s not as if having Stras instantly makes them win this series. It’s just that they’ve reduced their chances of winning every series they play when he doesn’t pitch.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  16. josh

    @ mb21:
    Word around Natdom when I checked the blogs a couple weeks ago was that people generally trusted Rizzo’s decision because “he got us this far.” No one seemed too up-in-arms about it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  17. akabari

    Oh@ mb21:
    Oh I know what you meant (dying laughing) I just meant that the Nats are definitely not helping themselves at ALL. Swinging at everything.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  18. mb21

    @ josh:
    I got a feeling that will change if they’re “this” close to winning this series. I’m pretty sure most Nats fans will feel that Strasburg = series victory against the Cardinals and they’re probably right.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  19. josh

    I’d say late in the season, when they realized they actually had a chance, was their time to limit Stras. Or better yet, why not shut him down a few weeks early as they did and let him pitch postseason? That’s shitty for him (being a big reason why they got there), shitty for fans, shitty for the team, shitty for casual fans, shitty for everyone.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  20. Rice Cube

    @ josh:
    I’m not sure they can just shut him down and then start him up again like that. They would have had to skip starts or just limit his innings or pitches per start and watch his side sessions carefully.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  21. EnricoPallazzo

    josh wrote:

    I’d say late in the season, when they realized they actually had a chance, was their time to limit Stras.

    why? to me that makes it sound like you are ok with them basically ceding the division in april. not sure if that’s the case with you but i know that there wasn’t much of an outcry at the start of the season when the nats announced this plan. well, people thoguht it was stupid, but i don’t really recall any nats fans saying, “hey, are you really giving up already? that’s fucking ridiculous.” i don’t care if you’re the fucking 2012 chicago cubs, you better at least pretend to think you have a shot in april/may. the idiocy of the plan itself is almost secondary; it’s the reason that mgmt decided to implement that plan in the first place that blows my mind.

    but i guess i wasn’t paying too much attention at that point so maybe i missed all of that.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  22. AB

    somebody made a post at BN about Ben Wells contract requiring he be on the 40-man roster for next season. any way to look that up somewhere to verify it??

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  23. mb21

    @ mb21:
    He signed for $550,000, which is late 2nd round money. He was taken in the 7th round. I have a hard time believing he’ll have to be added to the 40-man roster, but who knows?

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  24. Rizzo the Rat

    @ Rice Cube:
    Yeah, that wasn’t very wise (and neither was using him in such a low-leverage situation; Timmy is still valuable, imo, and much more so than their relievers. Then again, the Giants were fighting for their lives.)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  25. Mercurial Outfielder

    I’ve never Tweeted at Sullivan, but he has me blocked anyway. (dying laughing) (dying laughing) (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  26. mb21

    @ Mercurial Outfielder:
    At the time it was stupid that they left him unprotected. I’d still take him over Josh Vitters. The worst part was they had a spot on the roster. It’s no big deal that they lost him and never was, but it wasn’t well done by the Cubs at the time.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  27. EnricoPallazzo

    @ EnricoPallazzo:
    although… i was just offered tickets to the game at yankee stadium on friday and i had to turn them down for a really stupid reason. so now if the o’s lose tomorrow, i won’t have to feel bad about refusing the tickets.

    fuck yeah silver lining.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  28. Mercurial Outfielder

    @ mb21:
    That’s fine, but insinuating in any way–as Sullivan did–that the Cubs are hurting over losing a guy who K’d 43 times and walked 6 times in 167 PA this season is just asinine.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  29. WaLi

    GBTS wrote:

    If we get a Tigers-Yanks-Cards-Giants LCS combos, I’ll probably stop watching.
    Which is precisely the matchups MLB is begging for. (dying laughing)

    But but but…. The Tigers and the Cards are small market teams! MLB couldn’t be begging for small market teams!
    /competitive balance lottery

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  30. Suburban kid

    I like how this blog was too lazy to even post a final version of the Race to the Top. It’s dedicated to its discreditation.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  31. mb21

    @ Mercurial Outfielder:
    Agreed. I had no idea what he was insinuating. I was only responding to your comment that Sullivan said it was a bad idea. I agree and was outspoken about it when the Cubs left him unprotected. I just assumed Sullivan meant it for some stupid reason. (dying laughing)

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  32. mb21

    The teams I’m least interested in seeing advance are the Orioles, A’s, Cardinals, Giants. I’d probably have no interest in watching the LCS or WS if those teams advanced. It’s looking like we could easily get 3 of those teams to advance so my interest in the postseason will fade quickly. I’ll be watching the Yankees/A’s series if that’s what happens, but that’s about it.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment