2012 Cubs Bill James Projections, Part 2

In Projections by dmick8916 Comments

It’s Bill James week here at Obstructed View. We published the hitter’s projections a few days ago, our interview with Bill James and now the pitcher projections. I calculated the FIP.

Pitcher W L G GS IP H HR BB SO ERA FIP
Sean Marshall 5 4 78 0 75 71 6 21 65 3.24 3.43
Andrew Cashner 9 6 26 20 137 120 8 54 121 3.35 3.48
Carlos Marmol 5 4 74 0 76 52 5 52 97 3.43 3.87
Matt Garza 12 12 31 31 214 204 22 69 185 3.70 3.89
Kerry Wood 3 3 56 0 52 45 5 26 57 3.81 3.99
Ryan Dempster 11 12 32 32 203 195 21 80 185 3.95 4.01
Carlos Zambrano 10 10 30 30 181 167 16 78 149 3.83 4.13
Randy Wells 8 11 27 27 174 183 20 59 126 4.24 4.35
Casey Coleman 5 7 21 20 105 110 10 43 66 4.29 4.50
Jeff Samardzija 4 6 75 0 87 83 10 51 71 4.66 4.92
James Russell 2 4 60 2 54 63 11 13 39 5.17 5.24

The only thing that really jumps out here is Andrew Cashner. No idea how he’s projected to be the best starting pitcher on the staff by a wide margin. I included Kerry Wood because I figure there’s a decent chance he’ll be back.


Share this Post

Comments

  1. Mercurial Outfielder

    [quote name=Rice Cube]If Z is a 4ish FIP pitcher, he’s worth keeping…right?[/quote]No, because ninja pie lamp pickles.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  2. mb21

    [quote name=Rice Cube]If Z is a 4ish FIP pitcher, he’s worth keeping…right?[/quote]If you think you can get production from him while not pissing off every player on the team, including the manager.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  3. Rice Cube

    [quote name=Mercurial Outfielder]No, because ninja pie lamp pickles.[/quote]That sounds like something Ozzie would tweet.

    Yeah, I think the Theo meeting with Z that’s supposed to happen soon will determine whether they think he can be a good boy. $18MM is spent but it just seems like a lot of money to eat.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  4. mb21

    [quote name=Aisle424]We can keep this one on the front page though. It has more actual content that might be worth discussion.[/quote]I like your post better. I moved it to the top of the page. This post was basically just to create a new thread for some Cubs talk and then one on Unobstructed Views for the Sandusky crap.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  5. fang2415

    [quote name=Suburban kid 22]Whereabouts in England?[/quote]Souwf London. I can never believe how many foxes there are in urban areas here.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  6. fang2415

    [quote name=fang2415]Souwf London. I can never believe how many foxes there are in urban areas here.[/quote]Sorry if I should have posted that in the unobstructed view. I get a little confused when there’s no good instructions about posting.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  7. cdw

    Just read your review of BB season 4 MB. Nice work. I’m glad I waited to read it b/c I got away from the show for awhile and was re-immersed. I left several comments.

    Also, (dying laughing) at the Veron Wells/Dex S6 comp GBTS.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  8. Joshua Zambrano

    I’m not sure I understand the low win total expected from Z, as it throws the whole analysis into serious doubt. Big Z is only going to be 31, still in his prime, and usually averages far more starts. The last two seasons of 11 and 9 wins each were in large part due to the team under Jim Hendry moving him to the bullpen in 2010 because of a bad 3-week start to the season.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0
  9. Joshua Zambrano

    Another thing that jumps out to me is that which such sparkling sub-4.00 ERAs predicted for Cubs pitchers, the low Win totals are indicative of poor run support expected. If so, the Cubs solidifying their RBI production with big bats like Prince Fielder off free agency might improve those expected Wins, not just for pitchers but for the entire team.

      Quote  Reply

    0

    0

Leave a Comment